Skip to Main content Skip to Navigation
Journal articles

Are Lives a Substitute for Livelihoods? Terrorism, Security, and US Bilateral Imports

Abstract : In this article, we assess the impact of counterterrorism measures on trade. Our work brings three value addition to the literature: (1) it develops a simple theory to emphasize the endogeneity between terrorism acts, counterterrorism measures, and trade; (2) it delivers an original strategy to identify empirically the effect of counterterrorism security measures on trade flows (using third country incidents); and (3) it uses a new data set on business visas issued by the United States to test further the hypothesis that terrorism is affecting trade through the security channel. Our results suggest that counterterrorism security measures matter for US imports. The level of the impact is up to three times higher when the acts result in a relatively high number of victims, when the products are sensitive to shipping time, or when they ask for networks and business people mobility in order to be sold.
Keywords : terrorism trade security
Document type :
Journal articles
Complete list of metadata

https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-01109519
Contributor : Caroline Bauer Connect in order to contact the contributor
Submitted on : Monday, January 26, 2015 - 2:57:35 PM
Last modification on : Friday, April 29, 2022 - 10:13:02 AM

Links full text

Identifiers

Citation

Daniel Mirza, Thierry Verdier. Are Lives a Substitute for Livelihoods? Terrorism, Security, and US Bilateral Imports. Journal of Conflict Resolution, SAGE Publications, 2014, 58 (6), pp.943-975. ⟨10.1177/0022002713487312⟩. ⟨halshs-01109519⟩

Share

Metrics

Record views

154