Skip to Main content Skip to Navigation
Journal articles

The Blind Shall See! The Question of Anonymity in Journal Peer Review.

Abstract : This article examines the issue of the respective knowledge of authors and reviewers: is it fairer to judge a manuscript in the full light of day, or hidden away from prying eyes? Should one know everything about the authors of a manuscript, or nothing at all? In short, does the anonymity of the reviewers and/or authors guarantee or prevent an objective assessment? It looks at how these became central issues for scientific journals between 1950 and 1970. It then examine how, from the 1980s onwards, a certain number of categories became stabilized, such as the "single blind" and "double blind" and "open review", which lay down the options available to journals and learned societies.
Complete list of metadata

Cited literature [27 references]  Display  Hide  Download
Contributor : Didier Torny Connect in order to contact the contributor
Submitted on : Wednesday, April 23, 2014 - 3:12:11 PM
Last modification on : Wednesday, April 27, 2022 - 9:14:06 AM
Long-term archiving on: : Monday, April 10, 2017 - 4:17:10 PM


Explicit agreement for this submission



David Pontille, Didier Torny. The Blind Shall See! The Question of Anonymity in Journal Peer Review.. Ada: A Journal of Gender, New Media, and Technology, University of Oregon Libraries, 2014, ⟨10.7264/N3542KVW⟩. ⟨halshs-00981277⟩



Record views


Files downloads