The Blind Shall See! The Question of Anonymity in Journal Peer Review.

Abstract : This article examines the issue of the respective knowledge of authors and reviewers: is it fairer to judge a manuscript in the full light of day, or hidden away from prying eyes? Should one know everything about the authors of a manuscript, or nothing at all? In short, does the anonymity of the reviewers and/or authors guarantee or prevent an objective assessment? It looks at how these became central issues for scientific journals between 1950 and 1970. It then examine how, from the 1980s onwards, a certain number of categories became stabilized, such as the "single blind" and "double blind" and "open review", which lay down the options available to journals and learned societies.
Complete list of metadatas

Cited literature [27 references]  Display  Hide  Download

https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00981277
Contributor : Didier Torny <>
Submitted on : Wednesday, April 23, 2014 - 3:12:11 PM
Last modification on : Monday, November 12, 2018 - 10:54:21 AM
Long-term archiving on : Monday, April 10, 2017 - 4:17:10 PM

File

The_Blind_Shall_See_Pontille_T...
Explicit agreement for this submission

Identifiers

Citation

David Pontille, Didier Torny. The Blind Shall See! The Question of Anonymity in Journal Peer Review.. Ada: A Journal of Gender, New Media, and Technology, University of Oregon Libraries, 2014, http://adanewmedia.org/2014/04/issue4-pontilletorny/. ⟨10.7264/N3542KVW⟩. ⟨halshs-00981277⟩

Share

Metrics

Record views

1903

Files downloads

376