Are Niche Parties Fundamentally Different from Mainstream Parties? The Causes and the Electoral Consequences of Western European Parties' Policy Shifts, 1976-1998, American Journal of Political Science, vol.13, issue.2, pp.513-529, 2004. ,
DOI : 10.1111/j.0006-341X.2000.00645.x
Causes and Electoral Consequences of Party Policy Shifts in Multiparty Elections: Theoretical Results and Empirical Evidence, Annual Review of Political Science, vol.15, issue.1, pp.401-419, 2012. ,
DOI : 10.1146/annurev-polisci-031710-101450
The Spatial Structure of Party Competition: Party Dispersion within a Finite Policy Space, British Journal of Political Science, vol.39, issue.04, pp.805-824, 2009. ,
DOI : 10.1017/S0007123409990172
Centripetal and Centrifugal Incentives under Different Electoral Systems, American Journal of Political Science, vol.80, issue.2, pp.27-41, 2011. ,
DOI : 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2010.00482.x
Centripetal and Centrifugal Incentives in Electoral Systems, American Journal of Political Science, vol.34, issue.4, pp.903-935, 1990. ,
DOI : 10.2307/2111465
Parties' Policy Programms and the Dog that Didn't Bark: No Evidence that Proportional Systems Promote Extreme Party Positioning, British Journal of Political Science, vol.38, issue.3, pp.479-497, 2008. ,
Electoral Systems and Party Responsiveness, 2011. ,
DOI : 10.1007/978-3-642-19519-8_12
Political Economy of Institutions, Democracy and Voting, pp.303-325, 2011. ,
Mean voter representation and partisan constituency representation: Do parties respond to the mean voter position or to their supporters?, Party Politics, vol.56, issue.1, pp.275-301, 2011. ,
DOI : 10.1177/1354068810372100
A comparative spatial analysis of majoritarian and proportional elections, Electoral Studies, vol.20, issue.1, pp.109-125, 2001. ,
DOI : 10.1016/S0261-3794(99)00041-4
Party-System Extremism in Majoritarian and Proportional Electoral Systems, British Journal of Political Science, vol.12, issue.02, pp.341-361, 2011. ,
DOI : 10.2307/2131005
An Economic Theory of Democracy, 1957. ,
DOWNS AND TWO-PARTY CONVERGENCE, Annual Review of Political Science, vol.7, issue.1, pp.25-46, 2004. ,
DOI : 10.1146/annurev.polisci.7.012003.104711
The Logics of Electoral Politics, Comparative Political Studies, vol.79, issue.2, pp.155-199, 1994. ,
DOI : 10.1177/0010414094027002001
Effective Number of Parties: A Measure with Application to Western Europe, Comparative Political Studies, vol.12, issue.1, pp.3-27, 1979. ,
Electoral Rule Disproportionality and Platform Polarization, American Journal of Political Science, vol.14, issue.1, 2013. ,
DOI : 10.1007/s00355-015-0900-9
URL : https://kclpure.kcl.ac.uk/portal/en/publications/electoral-rule-disproportionality-and-platform-polarization(9aaa06e9-351f-453e-8981-dce1bc3e1658).html
Multi-party competition: A computational model with abstention and memory, Electoral Studies, vol.27, issue.3, pp.424-441, 2008. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.electstud.2008.02.010
Mad as Hell: How the Tea Party Movement Is Fundamentally Remaking Our Two-Party System, 2010. ,
Spatial Models of Party Competition, American Political Science Review, vol.52, issue.02, pp.368-377, 1963. ,
DOI : 10.2307/2224214
Party Polarization in the US Congress: Member Replacement and Member Adaptation, Party Politics, vol.12, issue.4, p.483, 2006. ,
DOI : 10.1177/1354068806064730
When do parties emphasise extreme positions? How strategic incentives for policy differentiation influence issue importance, European Journal of Political Research, vol.25, issue.3, pp.64-88, 2012. ,
DOI : 10.1111/j.1475-6765.2011.01989.x
On the salience of political issues: The problem with ???most important problem???, Electoral Studies, vol.24, issue.4, pp.555-79, 2005. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.electstud.2005.01.009