K. Danziger, Constructing the subject: Historical origins of psychological research, 1990.
DOI : 10.1017/CBO9780511524059

P. Duhem, The Aim and Structure of Physical Theory, American Journal of Physics, vol.22, issue.7, 1991.
DOI : 10.1119/1.1933818

G. Granger, La science et les sciences [Science and sciences], 1995.

R. Harré, Staking our claim for qualitative psychology as science, Qualitative Research in Psychology, vol.1, pp.3-14, 2004.

C. Hempel, Philosophy of natural science, 1966.

H. M. Johnson, Some Neglected Principles in Aptitude-Testing, The American Journal of Psychology, vol.47, issue.1, pp.159-165, 1935.
DOI : 10.2307/1416719

H. M. Johnson, Index-Numerology and Measures of Impairment, The American Journal of Psychology, vol.56, issue.4, pp.551-558, 1943.
DOI : 10.2307/1417354

M. S. Krause, Trying to Discover Sufficient Condition Causes, Methodology, vol.6, issue.2, pp.59-70, 2010.
DOI : 10.1027/1614-2241/a000007

M. S. Krause, Statistical significance testing and clinical trials., Psychotherapy, vol.48, issue.3, pp.217-222, 2011.
DOI : 10.1037/a0022088

T. S. Kuhn, The structure of scientific revolutions, 1996.

E. Lacot, E. J. Barbeau, C. Thomas-antrion, S. Basaglia-pappas, J. Parriente et al., Le TOP 12 : comment s'en servir pour reprer une pathologie du vieillissement cognitif [The TOP 12: How to use it to identify pathological cognitive aging, Neurosciences Cognitives et Cliniques, vol.3, pp.273-283, 2011.

J. T. Lamiell, `Nomothetic' and `Idiographic': Contrasting Windelband's Understanding with Contemporary Usage, Theory & Psychology, vol.8, issue.1, pp.23-38, 1998.
DOI : 10.1177/0959354398081002

J. T. Lamiell, Beyond individual and group differences, Thousand Oaks: Sage, 2003.

J. T. Lamiell, Statisticism in personality psychologists??? use of trait constructs: What is it? How was it contracted? Is there a cure?, New Ideas in Psychology, vol.31, issue.1, pp.65-71, 2013.
DOI : 10.1016/j.newideapsych.2011.02.009

I. Levi, The enterprise of knowledge: An essay on knowledge, credal probability, and chance, 1980.

S. O. Lilienfeld, Can psychology become a science? Personality and Individual Differences, pp.281-288, 2010.

M. D. Maraun, Measurement as a Normative Practice: Implications of Wittgenstein's Philosophy for Measurement in Psychology, Theory & Psychology, vol.8, issue.4, pp.435-462, 1998.
DOI : 10.1177/0959354398084001

J. Michell, An introduction to the logic of psychological measurement, 1990.

J. Michell, Quantitative science and the definition of measurement in psychology, British Journal of Psychology, vol.88, issue.3, pp.355-383, 1997.
DOI : 10.1111/j.2044-8295.1997.tb02641.x

J. Michell, Normal Science, Pathological Science And Psychometrics, Theory & Psychology, vol.10, pp.639-667, 2000.
DOI : 10.1163/ej.9789004188877.i-913.94
URL : http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.202.2742

J. Michell, Constructs, inferences, and mental measurement, New Ideas in Psychology, vol.31, issue.1, pp.13-21, 2013.
DOI : 10.1016/j.newideapsych.2011.02.004

P. C. Molenaar, A Manifesto on Psychology as Idiographic Science: Bringing the Person Back Into Scientific Psychology, This Time Forever, Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research & Perspective, vol.23, issue.4, pp.201-218, 2004.
DOI : 10.1348/000711003770480002

K. R. Popper, The logic of scientific discovery, 1959.

G. Rasch, Probabilistic models for some intelligence tests and attainment tests, 1960.

J. R. Searle, Intentionality: An essay in the philosophy of mind, 1983.
DOI : 10.1017/CBO9781139173452

P. Valéry, Monsieur Teste, 1973.

S. Vautier, The operationalization of general hypotheses versus the discovery of empirical laws in Psychology, Philosophia Scientae, vol.15, issue.15-2, pp.105-122, 2011.
DOI : 10.4000/philosophiascientiae.656
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00640487

S. Vautier, How to state general qualitative facts in psychology?, Quality & Quantity, vol.103, issue.1, pp.49-56, 2013.
DOI : 10.1007/s11135-011-9502-5
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00800183

S. Vautier, R. Gillie, M. Veldhuis, and . Kupelian, About validity of conclusions based on multiple linear regression: A commentary on Kupelian et al. (2010), Preventive Medicine, vol.52, issue.6, p.465, 2010.
DOI : 10.1016/j.ypmed.2011.01.013

S. Vautier, M. Veldhuis, E. Lacot, and N. Matton, The ambiguous utility of psychometrics for the interpretative foundation of socially relevant avatars, Theory & Psychology, vol.22, issue.6, pp.810-822, 2012.
DOI : 10.1177/0959354312450093
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00667697