M. Abdellaoui, Parameter-Free Elicitation of Utility and Probability Weighting Functions, Management Science, vol.46, issue.11, pp.1497-1512, 2000.
DOI : 10.1287/mnsc.46.11.1497.12080

M. -abdellaoui, H. Bleichrodt, and O. Haridon, A tractable method to measure utility and loss aversion under prospect theory, Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, vol.42, issue.3, pp.245-266, 2008.
DOI : 10.1007/s11166-008-9039-8

M. -abdellaoui, H. Bleichrodt, and C. Paraschiv, Loss Aversion Under Prospect Theory: A Parameter-Free Measurement, Management Science, vol.53, issue.10, pp.1659-1674, 2007.
DOI : 10.1287/mnsc.1070.0711

M. -abdellaoui, E. Diecidue, and A. Öncüler, Risk Preferences at Different Time Periods: An Experimental Investigation, Management Science, vol.57, issue.5, pp.975-987, 2011.
DOI : 10.1287/mnsc.1110.1324

M. -abdellaoui, O. Haridon, and C. Paraschiv, Experienced vs. Described Uncertainty: Do We Need Two Prospect Theory Specifications?, Management Science, vol.57, issue.10, pp.1879-1895, 2011.
DOI : 10.1287/mnsc.1110.1368

URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00959149

J. -abellán-perpinán, H. Bleichrodt, and J. Pinto-prades, The predictive validity of prospect theory versus expected utility in health utility measurement, Journal of Health Economics, vol.28, issue.6, pp.1039-1047, 2009.
DOI : 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2009.09.002

J. -abellán-perpinán and J. Pinto, Towards a better QALY model, Health Economics, vol.22, issue.7, pp.665-676, 2006.
DOI : 10.1002/hec.1095

J. M. -abellán-perpinán, F. I. Sánchez-martínez, J. E. Martínez-pérez, and I. Méndez-martínez, Debiasing EQ-5D tariffs. New estimations of the Spanish EQ-5D value set under nonexpected utility, Economic Working Papers at Centro de Estudios Andaluces E2009/06, 2009.

A. Attema, Developments in time preference and their implications for medical decision making, Journal of the Operational Research Society, vol.296, issue.2, pp.1388-1399, 2012.
DOI : 10.1057/jors.2011.137

A. Attema, H. Bleichrodt, and P. Wakker, A Direct Method for Measuring Discounting and QALYs More Easily and Reliably, Medical Decision Making, vol.32, issue.4, pp.583-593, 2012.
DOI : 10.1177/0272989X12451654

A. Attema and W. Brouwer, The correction of TTO-scores for utility curvature using a risk-free utility elicitation method, Journal of Health Economics, vol.28, issue.1, pp.234-243, 2009.
DOI : 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2008.10.004

A. Attema and W. Brouwer, The way that you do it? An elaborate test of procedural invariance of TTO, using a choice-based design, The European Journal of Health Economics, vol.9, issue.4, pp.491-500, 2012.
DOI : 10.1007/s10198-011-0318-y

H. Bleichrodt, J. Abellan-perpiñan, J. Pinto-prades, and I. Mendez-martinez, Resolving Inconsistencies in Utility Measurement Under Risk: Tests of Generalizations of Expected Utility, Management Science, vol.53, issue.3, pp.469-482, 2007.
DOI : 10.1287/mnsc.1060.0647

H. Bleichrodt and M. Johannesson, Time Preference for Health: A Test of Stationarity versus Decreasing Timing Aversion, Journal of Mathematical Psychology, vol.45, issue.2, pp.265-282, 2001.
DOI : 10.1006/jmps.2000.1312

H. Bleichrodt and J. Miyamoto, A Characterization of Quality-Adjusted Life-Years Under Cumulative Prospect Theory, Mathematics of Operations Research, vol.28, issue.1, pp.181-193, 2003.
DOI : 10.1287/moor.28.1.181.14261

H. Bleichrodt and J. Pinto, A Parameter-Free Elicitation of the Probability Weighting Function in Medical Decision Analysis, Management Science, vol.46, issue.11, pp.1485-1496, 2000.
DOI : 10.1287/mnsc.46.11.1485.12086

H. Bleichrodt and J. Pinto, Loss Aversion and Scale Compatibility in Two-Attribute Trade-Offs, Journal of Mathematical Psychology, vol.46, issue.3, pp.315-337, 2002.
DOI : 10.1006/jmps.2001.1390

H. Bleichrodt and J. Pinto, The Validity of Qalys Under Non-expected Utility*, The Economic Journal, vol.55, issue.503, pp.533-550, 2005.
DOI : 10.1023/A:1007799303256

H. Bleichrodt, J. Pinto, and J. Abellán-perpinán, A consistency test of the time trade-off, Journal of Health Economics, vol.22, issue.6, pp.1037-1052, 2003.
DOI : 10.1016/S0167-6296(03)00046-8

H. Bleichrodt, J. Pinto, and P. Wakker, Making Descriptive Use of Prospect Theory to Improve the Prescriptive Use of Expected Utility, Management Science, vol.47, issue.11, pp.1498-1514, 2001.
DOI : 10.1287/mnsc.47.11.1498.10248

H. Bleichrodt and J. Quiggin, Characterizing QALYs under a General Rank Dependent Utility Model, Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, vol.15, issue.2, pp.151-165, 1997.
DOI : 10.1023/A:1007734401982

A. Booij and G. Van-de-kuilen, A parameter-free analysis of the utility of money for the general population under prospect theory, Journal of Economic Psychology, vol.30, issue.4, pp.651-666, 2009.
DOI : 10.1016/j.joep.2009.05.004

A. Booij, B. Van-praag, and G. Van-de-kuilen, A parametric analysis of prospect theory???s functionals for the general population, Theory and Decision, vol.42, issue.4, pp.115-148, 2010.
DOI : 10.1007/s11238-009-9144-4

R. Bostic, R. Herrnstein, and R. Luce, The effect on the preference-reversal phenomenon of using choice indifferences, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, vol.13, issue.2, pp.193-212, 1990.
DOI : 10.1016/0167-2681(90)90086-S

A. -chateauneuf and M. Cohen, Risk seeking with diminishing marginal utility in a non-expected utility model, Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, vol.55, issue.229, pp.77-91, 1994.
DOI : 10.1007/BF01073404

H. -fehr-duda, M. De-gennaro, R. Schubert, and . Gender, Gender, Financial Risk, and Probability Weights, Theory and Decision, vol.52, issue.2-3, pp.283-313, 2006.
DOI : 10.1007/s11238-005-4590-0

C. Fox and R. Poldrack, Prospect theory and the brain, Handbook of Neuroeconomics, 2008.
DOI : 10.1016/b978-0-12-374176-9.00011-7

S. Frederick, G. Loewenstein, O. Donoghue, and T. , Time Discounting and Time Preference: A Critical Review, Journal of Economic Literature, vol.40, issue.2, pp.351-401, 2002.
DOI : 10.1257/jel.40.2.351

URL : http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.197.5565

A. Gafni and G. Torrance, Risk Attitude and Time Preference in Health, Management Science, vol.30, issue.4, pp.440-451, 1984.
DOI : 10.1287/mnsc.30.4.440

R. Gonzalez and G. Wu, On the Shape of the Probability Weighting Function, Cognitive Psychology, vol.38, issue.1, pp.129-166, 1999.
DOI : 10.1006/cogp.1998.0710

D. -kahneman and A. Tversky, Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk, Econometrica, vol.47, issue.2, pp.263-291, 1979.
DOI : 10.2307/1914185

-. Kvamme, M. Gyrd-hansen, D. Olsen, J. Kristiansen, and I. , Increasing marginal utility of small increases in life-expectancy?, Journal of Health Economics, vol.29, issue.4, pp.541-548, 2010.
DOI : 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2010.03.010

V. -köbberling and P. Wakker, An index of loss aversion, Journal of Economic Theory, vol.122, issue.1, pp.119-131, 2005.
DOI : 10.1016/j.jet.2004.03.009

D. -laughhunn, J. Payne, and R. Crum, Managerial Risk Preferences for Below-Target Returns, Management Science, vol.26, issue.12, pp.1238-1249, 1980.
DOI : 10.1287/mnsc.26.12.1238

R. Libby and P. Fishburn, Behavioral Models of Risk Taking in Business Decisions: A Survey and Evaluation, Journal of Accounting Research, vol.15, issue.2, pp.272-292, 1977.
DOI : 10.2307/2490353

-. , H. Sutherland, H. Tibshirani, R. Ciampi, A. Till et al., The measurement of patients' values in medicine, Medical Decision Making, vol.2, pp.449-462, 1982.

M. Marquis and M. Holmer, Alternative Models of Choice Under Uncertainty and Demand for Health Insurance, The Review of Economics and Statistics, vol.78, issue.3, pp.421-427, 1996.
DOI : 10.2307/2109789

J. Miyamoto and S. Eraker, Parametric models of the utility of survival duration: Tests of axioms in a generic utility framework, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, vol.44, issue.2, pp.166-202, 1989.
DOI : 10.1016/0749-5978(89)90024-1

M. -ogaki and Q. Zhang, Decreasing Relative Risk Aversion and Tests of Risk Sharing, Econometrica, vol.69, issue.2, pp.515-526, 2001.
DOI : 10.1111/1468-0262.00201

A. Oliver, The internal consistency of the standard gamble: tests after adjusting for prospect theory, Journal of Health Economics, vol.22, issue.4, pp.659-674, 2003.
DOI : 10.1016/S0167-6296(03)00023-7

-. , J. Loomes, G. Brey, and R. , Trying to estimate a monetary value for the QALY, Journal of Health Economics, vol.28, pp.553-562, 2009.

J. -pliskin, D. Shepard, and M. Weinstein, Utility Functions for Life Years and Health Status, Operations Research, vol.28, issue.1, pp.206-224, 1980.
DOI : 10.1287/opre.28.1.206

J. -quiggin, A theory of anticipated utility, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, vol.3, issue.4, pp.323-343, 1982.
DOI : 10.1016/0167-2681(82)90008-7

A. -robinson, G. Loomes, and M. Jones-lee, Visual Analog Scales, Standard Gambles, and Relative Risk Aversion, Medical Decision Making, vol.95, issue.1, pp.17-27, 2001.
DOI : 10.1177/0272989X0102100103

U. Schmidt and S. Traub, An Experimental Test of Loss Aversion, Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, vol.25, issue.3, pp.233-249, 2002.
DOI : 10.1023/A:1020923921649

U. Schmidt and H. Zank, A genuine foundation for prospect theory, Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, vol.44, issue.2, pp.97-113, 2012.
DOI : 10.1007/s11166-012-9150-8

C. Starmer, Developments in Non-Expected Utility Theory: The Hunt for a Descriptive Theory of Choice under Risk, Journal of Economic Literature, vol.38, issue.2, pp.332-382, 2000.
DOI : 10.1257/jel.38.2.332

A. Stiggelbout, G. Kiebert, J. Kievit, J. Leer, G. Stoter et al., Utility Assessment in Cancer Patients, Medical Decision Making, vol.43, issue.1, pp.82-90, 1994.
DOI : 10.1177/0272989X9401400110

H. Stott, Cumulative prospect theory's functional menagerie, Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, vol.55, issue.1, pp.101-130, 2006.
DOI : 10.1007/s11166-006-8289-6

J. Treadwell and L. Lenert, Health Values and Prospect Theory, Medical Decision Making, vol.19, issue.3, pp.344-352, 1999.
DOI : 10.1177/0272989X9901900313

A. -tversky and D. Kahneman, Rational Choice and the Framing of Decisions, The Journal of Business, vol.59, issue.S4, pp.251-278, 1986.
DOI : 10.1086/296365

A. -tversky and D. Kahneman, Loss Aversion in Riskless Choice: A Reference-Dependent Model, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol.106, issue.4, pp.1039-1061, 1991.
DOI : 10.2307/2937956

A. -tversky and D. Kahneman, Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty, Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, vol.55, issue.1, pp.297-323, 1992.
DOI : 10.1007/BF00122574

G. -van-de-kuilen and P. Wakker, The Midweight Method to Measure Attitudes Toward Risk and Ambiguity, Management Science, vol.57, issue.3, pp.582-598, 2011.
DOI : 10.1287/mnsc.1100.1282

F. -van-nooten and W. Brouwer, The influence of subjective expectations about length and quality of life on time trade-off answers, Health Economics, vol.13, issue.8, pp.819-823, 2004.
DOI : 10.1002/hec.873

-. Osch, S. Stiggelbout, and A. , The construction of standard gamble utilities, Health Economics, vol.15, issue.1, pp.31-40, 2008.
DOI : 10.1002/hec.1235

-. Osch, S. Van-den-hout, W. Stiggelbout, and A. , Exploring the Reference Point in Prospect Theory: Gambles for Length of Life, Medical Decision Making, vol.26, issue.4, pp.338-346, 2006.
DOI : 10.1177/0272989X06290484

-. Osch, S. Wakker, P. Van-den-hout, W. B. Stiggelbout, and A. , Correcting Biases in Standard Gamble and Time Tradeoff Utilities, Medical Decision Making, vol.22, issue.1, pp.511-517, 2004.
DOI : 10.1177/0272989X04268955

L. Verhoef, A. De-haan, and W. Van-daal, Risk Attitude in Gambles with Years of Life, Medical Decision Making, vol.299, issue.2, pp.194-200, 1994.
DOI : 10.2307/1914185

P. Wakker, Prospect theory: For risk and ambiguity, 2010.
DOI : 10.1017/CBO9780511779329

P. -wakker, Separating marginal utility and probabilistic risk aversion, Theory and Decision, vol.55, issue.1, pp.1-44, 1994.
DOI : 10.1007/BF01075296

P. -wakker and D. Deneffe, Eliciting von Neumann-Morgenstern Utilities When Probabilities Are Distorted or Unknown, Management Science, vol.42, issue.8, pp.1131-1150, 1996.
DOI : 10.1287/mnsc.42.8.1131

P. -wakker and A. Stiggelbout, Explaining Distortions in Utility Elicitation through the Rank-dependent Model for Risky Choices, Medical Decision Making, vol.86, issue.2, pp.180-186, 1995.
DOI : 10.2307/1914185