An empire divided: french natural philosophy (1670-1690)

Sophie Roux (1)

1 La République des savoirs : Lettres, Sciences, Philosophie

During the seventeenth century there were different ways of opposing the new mechanical philosophy and the old Aristotelian philosophy. Remarkably enough, one of this way succeeded in becoming stable beyond the moment of its formulation, one according to which Descartes would be the benchmark by which the works of other natural philosophers of the seventeenth century fall either on the side of the old or the new. I consequently examine the French debate where this representation emerges, a debate that took place along with the development of a Cartesian propaganda in the 1660s and the ensuing official condemnations of the philosophy of Descartes, which was said to constitute a danger for the mystery of Eucharist. But these condemnations pronounced in the name of theology, as numerous and radical as they were, were not considered to be sufficient. They were assisted by numerous polemical works, the audience of which were learned companies of courteous honnêtes gens, and the object of which was to defend a certain way of proceeding in natural philosophy. I consequently concentrate on two correlated questions, the question of what kind of ontological entities are necessary for the establishment of a good physics, and the correlated question of what norms should be adopted in natural philosophy. I show quite systematically that the criticisms of Cartesian philosophers by the Oratorian Jean-Baptiste de La Grange, the bishop Pierre-Daniel Huet, and various Jesuits, Ignace Pardies, Antoine Rochon, Louis Le Valois, Gabriel Daniel, René Rapin, and Honoré Fabri respond to the mockeries of Gérauld de Cordemoy, Jacques Rohault, Louis de La Forge, Bernard Lamy, Nicolas Malebranche or Antoine Arnauld concerning the scholastic entities. Not only do I contrast their philosophical arguments concerning ontological entities and the norms to be respected in physics, but also their ways of defining the philosophical enterprise and its public.

Mots clés: cartesianism; natural philosophy; jesuits; sunbstantial forms; controversy; transsubstantiation; physical explanation

Domaines: Histoire, Philosophie et Sociologie des sciences; Sciences de l'Homme et Société

Sophie Roux. An empire divided: french natural philosophy (1670-1690). Garber, Dan; Roux, Sophie. The Mechanization of Natural Philosophy, Springer, pp.55-98, 2012, 9789400743441, 978-9400743441. ⟨10.1007/978-94-007-4345-8_3⟩. ⟨halshs-00807062⟩