Assessing impact and quality from local dynamics of citation networks

Abstract : We show that essentially local dynamics of citation networks bring special information about the relevance/quality of a paper. Up to some rescaling, they exhibit universal behavior in citation dynamics: temporal patterns are remarkably consistent across disciplines, and uncover a prediction method for citations based on the structure of references only, at publication time. Above-average cited papers universally focus extensively on their own recent subfield - as such, citation counts essentially select what may plausibly be considered as the most disciplinary and normal science; whereas papers which have a peculiar dynamics, such as re-birthing scientific works - 'rediscovered classics' or 'early birds' - are comparatively poorly cited, despite their plausible relevance for the underlying communities. The "rebirth index" that we propose to quantify this phenomenon may be used as a complementary quality-defining criterion, in addition to final citation counts.
Liste complète des métadonnées

Littérature citée [23 références]  Voir  Masquer  Télécharger
Contributeur : Camille Roth <>
Soumis le : dimanche 20 janvier 2013 - 20:23:42
Dernière modification le : jeudi 7 février 2019 - 15:46:13
Document(s) archivé(s) le : dimanche 21 avril 2013 - 03:52:55


Fichiers produits par l'(les) auteur(s)



Camille Roth, Jiang Wu, Sergi Lozano. Assessing impact and quality from local dynamics of citation networks. Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, 2012, 6 (1), pp.111-120. 〈10.1016/j.joi.2011.08.005〉. 〈halshs-00778517〉



Consultations de la notice


Téléchargements de fichiers