Skip to Main content Skip to Navigation
Journal articles

Assessing impact and quality from local dynamics of citation networks

Abstract : We show that essentially local dynamics of citation networks bring special information about the relevance/quality of a paper. Up to some rescaling, they exhibit universal behavior in citation dynamics: temporal patterns are remarkably consistent across disciplines, and uncover a prediction method for citations based on the structure of references only, at publication time. Above-average cited papers universally focus extensively on their own recent subfield - as such, citation counts essentially select what may plausibly be considered as the most disciplinary and normal science; whereas papers which have a peculiar dynamics, such as re-birthing scientific works - 'rediscovered classics' or 'early birds' - are comparatively poorly cited, despite their plausible relevance for the underlying communities. The "rebirth index" that we propose to quantify this phenomenon may be used as a complementary quality-defining criterion, in addition to final citation counts.
Complete list of metadata

Cited literature [23 references]  Display  Hide  Download
Contributor : Camille Roth Connect in order to contact the contributor
Submitted on : Sunday, January 20, 2013 - 8:23:42 PM
Last modification on : Thursday, October 21, 2021 - 5:12:51 AM
Long-term archiving on: : Sunday, April 21, 2013 - 3:52:55 AM


Files produced by the author(s)




Camille Roth, Jiang Wu, Sergi Lozano. Assessing impact and quality from local dynamics of citation networks. Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, 2012, 6 (1), pp.111-120. ⟨10.1016/j.joi.2011.08.005⟩. ⟨halshs-00778517⟩



Record views


Files downloads