Assessing impact and quality from local dynamics of citation networks

Abstract : We show that essentially local dynamics of citation networks bring special information about the relevance/quality of a paper. Up to some rescaling, they exhibit universal behavior in citation dynamics: temporal patterns are remarkably consistent across disciplines, and uncover a prediction method for citations based on the structure of references only, at publication time. Above-average cited papers universally focus extensively on their own recent subfield - as such, citation counts essentially select what may plausibly be considered as the most disciplinary and normal science; whereas papers which have a peculiar dynamics, such as re-birthing scientific works - 'rediscovered classics' or 'early birds' - are comparatively poorly cited, despite their plausible relevance for the underlying communities. The "rebirth index" that we propose to quantify this phenomenon may be used as a complementary quality-defining criterion, in addition to final citation counts.
Complete list of metadatas

Cited literature [23 references]  Display  Hide  Download

https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00778517
Contributor : Camille Roth <>
Submitted on : Sunday, January 20, 2013 - 8:23:42 PM
Last modification on : Tuesday, May 14, 2019 - 10:16:19 AM
Long-term archiving on : Sunday, April 21, 2013 - 3:52:55 AM

File

temporalcitation-joi_last.pdf
Files produced by the author(s)

Identifiers

Citation

Camille Roth, Jiang Wu, Sergi Lozano. Assessing impact and quality from local dynamics of citation networks. Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, 2012, 6 (1), pp.111-120. ⟨10.1016/j.joi.2011.08.005⟩. ⟨halshs-00778517⟩

Share

Metrics

Record views

1086

Files downloads

417