Skip to Main content Skip to Navigation
Journal articles

Person as moralist and scientist: Open Peer Commentary

Abstract : Scientific inquiry possibly shares with people's ordinary understanding the same evolutionary determinants, and affect-laden intuitions that shape moral judgments also play a decisive role in decision-making, planning, and scientific reasoning. Therefore, if ordinary understanding does differ from scientific inquiry, the reason does not reside in the fact that the former (but not the latter) is endowed with moral considerations.
Complete list of metadata

https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00775578
Contributor : Anouk Barberousse <>
Submitted on : Tuesday, January 22, 2013 - 4:16:25 PM
Last modification on : Thursday, July 1, 2021 - 5:54:03 PM

Links full text

Identifiers

Citation

Marcus Vinícius C. Baldo, Anouk Barberousse. Person as moralist and scientist: Open Peer Commentary. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, Cambridge University Press (CUP), 2010, 33 (4), pp.331-331. ⟨10.1017/S0140525X10001676⟩. ⟨halshs-00775578⟩

Share

Metrics

Record views

275