A contrastive analysis of five automated QA tools (QA Distiller 6.5.8, Xbench 2.8, ErrorSpy 5.0, SDLTrados 2007 QA Checker 2.0 and SDLX 2007 SP2 QA Check)

Abstract : This chapter offers a comparison of five formal quality evaluation tools and shows in what ways such tools can be integrated into the translation workflow. The functional features of the tools are compared, their user-friendliness, their efficiency and their cost. Examples are given that illustrate in what ways the choice of QA tool for a specific translation project is determined by the project settings.
Document type :
Book sections
Complete list of metadatas

https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00720773
Contributor : Ilse Depraetere <>
Submitted on : Wednesday, July 25, 2012 - 4:51:49 PM
Last modification on : Tuesday, July 3, 2018 - 11:45:50 AM

Identifiers

  • HAL Id : halshs-00720773, version 1

Collections

Citation

Antonia Debove,, Sabrina Furlan,, Ilse Depraetere. A contrastive analysis of five automated QA tools (QA Distiller 6.5.8, Xbench 2.8, ErrorSpy 5.0, SDLTrados 2007 QA Checker 2.0 and SDLX 2007 SP2 QA Check). Mouton de Gruyter. Perspectives on translation quality, Mouton de Gruyter, pp.161-192., 2012. ⟨halshs-00720773⟩

Share

Metrics

Record views

327