Autonomous typological prosodic evolution versus the Germanic superstrate in diachronic French phonology

Abstract : The traditional idea that in Early French, the Frankish superstrate had a major influence on the phonology is mistaken. Facts from Old Frankish itself show that this cannot have been the case. In addition, the phonetic concept on which the idea is based, i.e. the distinction between 'expiratory' and 'melodic' languages, is outdated and invalid. The facts for which the Frankish influence was invoked find a much more satisfactory explanation if one considers the evolution of the entire prosodic system of the language. The distinction between syllable and word languages, as proposed by Auer and Uhmann, provides a fruitful framework for this.
Document type :
Book sections
Complete list of metadatas

https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00658141
Contributor : Roland Noske <>
Submitted on : Monday, January 9, 2012 - 11:04:33 PM
Last modification on : Tuesday, July 3, 2018 - 11:29:49 AM

Identifiers

  • HAL Id : halshs-00658141, version 1

Collections

Citation

Roland Noske. Autonomous typological prosodic evolution versus the Germanic superstrate in diachronic French phonology. Aboh, Enoch, Elisabeth van der Linden, Josep Quer & Petra Sleeman. Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 2007, John Benjamins Publishing Company. Amsterdam/Philadelphia, pp.223-242., 2009, RLLT. ⟨halshs-00658141⟩

Share

Metrics

Record views

170