K. Braunsberger, H. Wybenga, and R. Gates, A comparison of reliability between telephone and web-based surveys, Journal of Business Research, vol.60, issue.7, pp.758-64, 2007.
DOI : 10.1016/j.jbusres.2007.02.015

B. J. Calder, L. W. Phillips, and A. M. Tybout, Designing Research for Application, Journal of Consumer Research, vol.8, issue.2, pp.197-207, 1981.
DOI : 10.1086/208856

C. Cobanoglu, B. Warde, and P. Moreo, A comparison of mail, fax, and Web-based survey methods, International Journal of Market Research, vol.43, issue.4, pp.405-410, 2001.

M. P. Couper, Web Surveys, Public Opinion Quarterly, vol.64, issue.4, pp.464-494, 2000.
DOI : 10.1086/318641

D. Crowne and D. Marlowe, A new scale of social desirability independent of psychopathology., Journal of Consulting Psychology, vol.24, issue.4, pp.349-354, 1960.
DOI : 10.1037/h0047358

D. D. Dillman, G. Phelps, R. Tortora, K. Swift, J. Kohrell et al., Response rate and measurement differences in mixed-mode surveys using mail, telephone, interactive voice response (IVR) and the Internet, Social Science Research, vol.38, issue.1, 2001.
DOI : 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2008.03.007

S. Fricker, M. Galesic, R. Tourangeau, and T. Yan, An Experimental Comparison of Web and Telephone Surveys, Public Opinion Quarterly, vol.69, issue.3, pp.370-392, 2005.
DOI : 10.1093/poq/nfi027

J. Greenberg, The college sophomore as guinea pig: Setting the record straight, Academy of Management Review, vol.12, issue.1, pp.157-159, 1987.

K. Hassanein and M. Head, The Impact of Infusing Social Presence in the Web Interface: An Investigation Across Product Types, International Journal of Electronic Commerce, vol.10, issue.2, pp.31-55, 2005.
DOI : 10.2753/JEC1086-4415100202

D. Heerwegh and G. Loosveldt, Face-to-face versus Web surveying in a high-Internetcoverage population: differences in Response Quality, The Public Opinion Quarterly, issue.5, pp.72-836, 2008.

M. Herbert, Comportement de réponse de l'individu en situation de questionnement : le biais du répondant en comportement du consommateur, Thèse de doctorat en sciences de gestion, 2005.

A. L. Holbrook, M. C. Green, and J. A. Krosnick, Telephone versus Face-to-Face Interviewing of National Probability Samples with Long Questionnaires, Public Opinion Quarterly, vol.67, issue.1, pp.79-125, 2003.
DOI : 10.1086/346010

L. R. Kahle and P. M. Homer, Physical Attractiveness of the Celebrity Endorser: A Social Adaptation Perspective, Journal of Consumer Research, vol.11, issue.4, pp.954-961, 1985.
DOI : 10.1086/209029

F. Kreuter, S. Presser, and R. Tourangeau, Social Desirability Bias in CATI, IVR, and Web Surveys: The Effects of Mode and Question Sensitivity, Public Opinion Quarterly, vol.72, issue.5, pp.72-847, 2008.
DOI : 10.1093/poq/nfn063

J. A. Krosnick, Response strategies for coping with the cognitive demands of attitude measures in surveys, Applied Cognitive Psychology, vol.14, issue.3, pp.213-236, 1991.
DOI : 10.1002/acp.2350050305

C. Martin and D. Nagao, Some effects of computerized interviewing on job applicant responses., Journal of Applied Psychology, vol.74, issue.1, pp.72-80, 1989.
DOI : 10.1037/0021-9010.74.1.72

H. Mcdonald and S. Adam, A comparison of online and postal data collection methods in marketing research, Marketing Intelligence & Planning, vol.21, issue.2, pp.85-95, 2003.
DOI : 10.1108/02634500310465399

W. J. Mcguire, Attitude and Attitude Change, 1985.

C. Nass, Y. Moon, and P. Carney, Are People Polite to Computers? Responses to Computer-Based Interviewing Systems1, Journal of Applied Social Psychology, vol.52, issue.5, pp.1093-1110, 1999.
DOI : 10.2307/255867

G. Lautenschlager and V. Flaherty, Computer administration of questions: More desirable or more social desirability?, Journal of Applied Psychology, vol.75, issue.3, pp.310-314, 1990.
DOI : 10.1037/0021-9010.75.3.310

M. T. Orne, On the social psychology of the psychological experiment: With particular reference to demand characteristics and their implications., American Psychologist, vol.17, issue.11, pp.776-783, 1962.
DOI : 10.1037/h0043424

R. A. Peterson, On the Use of College Students in Social Science Research: Insights from a Second-Order Meta-analysis, Journal of Consumer Research, vol.28, issue.3, pp.450-461, 2001.
DOI : 10.1086/323732

W. Richman, S. Kiesler, S. Weisband, and F. Dragow, A meta-analytic study of social desirability distortion in computer-administered questionnaires, traditional questionnaires, and interviews., Journal of Applied Psychology, vol.84, issue.5, pp.754-775, 1999.
DOI : 10.1037/0021-9010.84.5.754

N. Schwartz and S. Sudman, Answering questions: methodology of determining cognition and communication processes in survey research, 1996.

D. O. Sears, College sophomores in the laboratory: Influences of a narrow data base on social psychology's view of human nature., Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, vol.51, issue.3, pp.515-530, 1986.
DOI : 10.1037/0022-3514.51.3.515

R. Tourangeau and T. Yan, Sensitive questions in surveys., Psychological Bulletin, vol.133, issue.5, pp.859-883, 2007.
DOI : 10.1037/0033-2909.133.5.859