D. P. Acemoglu, L. Aghion, D. Bursztyn, and . Hemous, The Environment and Directed Technical Change'', forthcoming in American Economic Review, 2011.

R. U. Ayres, Resources, scarcity, technology and growth, Chapter, pp.142-154, 2005.

R. Boucekkine, N. Hritonenko, and Y. Yatsenko, Scarcity, regulation and endogenous technical progress, Journal of Mathematical Economics, vol.47, issue.2, pp.186-199, 2011.
DOI : 10.1016/j.jmateco.2011.02.002
URL : http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.607.3837

R. Boucekkine, J. Krawczyk, and T. Vallée, Towards an understanding of tradeoffs between regional wealth, tightness of a common environmental constraint and the sharing rules, Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, vol.34, issue.9, pp.1813-1835, 2010.
DOI : 10.1016/j.jedc.2010.02.004
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00422486

R. Boucekkine, M. Germain, O. Licandro, and A. Magnus, Creative destruction, investment volatility and the average age of capital, Journal of Economic Growth, vol.3, issue.4, pp.361-384, 1998.
DOI : 10.1023/A:1009716023203

R. Boucekkine, M. Germain, and O. Licandro, Replacement Echoes in the Vintage Capital Growth Model, Journal of Economic Theory, vol.74, issue.2, pp.333-348, 1997.
DOI : 10.1006/jeth.1996.2265

L. Bovenberg and S. Smulders, Transitional Impacts of Environmental Policy in an Endogenous Growth Model, International Economic Review, vol.37, issue.4, pp.861-93, 1996.
DOI : 10.2307/2527315

L. Bovenberg and S. Smulders, Environmental quality and pollution-augmenting technological change in a two-sector endogenous growth model, Journal of Public Economics, vol.57, issue.3, pp.369-391, 1995.
DOI : 10.1016/0047-2727(95)80002-Q

C. Corduneanu, Integral Equations and Applications, 1991.
DOI : 10.1017/CBO9780511569395

J. H. Dales, Pollution, property, prices, 1968.

G. Feichtinger, R. F. Hartl, P. M. Kort, and V. Veliov, Capital accumulation under technological progress and learning: A vintage capital approach, European Journal of Operational Research, vol.172, issue.1, pp.293-310, 2006.
DOI : 10.1016/j.ejor.2004.07.070

G. Feichtinger, R. Hartl, P. Kort, and V. Veliov, Environmental policy, the porter hypothesis and the composition of capital: Effects of learning and technological progress, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, vol.50, issue.2, pp.434-446, 2005.
DOI : 10.1016/j.jeem.2004.12.001

O. Godal and G. Klassen, Carbon trading across sources and periods constrained by the Marrakesh Accords, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, vol.51, issue.3, pp.308-322, 2006.
DOI : 10.1016/j.jeem.2005.07.003

A. Grimaud, Pollution Permits and Sustainable Growth in a Schumpeterian Model, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, vol.38, issue.3, pp.246-266, 1999.
DOI : 10.1006/jeem.1999.1088

R. Hart, Growth, environment and innovation???a model with production vintages and environmentally oriented research, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, vol.48, issue.3, pp.1078-109, 2004.
DOI : 10.1016/j.jeem.2004.02.001

N. Hritonenko and Y. Yatsenko, Integral-functional equations for optimal renovation problems, Optimization, vol.28, issue.3, pp.249-261, 1996.
DOI : 10.1080/02331939408844014

N. Hritonenko and Y. Yatsenko, Turnpike and Optimal Trajectories in Integral Dynamic Models with Endogenous Delay, Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, vol.74, issue.1, pp.109-127, 2005.
DOI : 10.1007/s10957-005-6395-2

N. Hritonenko and Y. Yatsenko, Anticipation echoes in vintage capital models, Mathematical and Computer Modelling, vol.48, issue.5-6, pp.734-748, 2008.
DOI : 10.1016/j.mcm.2007.10.014

N. Hritonenko and Y. Yatsenko, Technological innovations, economic renovation, and anticipation effects, Journal of Mathematical Economics, vol.46, issue.6, pp.1064-1078, 2010.
DOI : 10.1016/j.jmateco.2010.08.002

P. A. Jouvet, . Ph, G. Michel, and . Rottillon, Optimal growth with pollution: how to use pollution permits?, Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, vol.29, issue.9, pp.1597-1609, 2005.
DOI : 10.1016/j.jedc.2004.09.004

F. Krysiak, Environmental regulation, technological diversity, and the dynamics of technological change, Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, vol.35, issue.4, pp.528-544, 2011.
DOI : 10.1016/j.jedc.2010.12.004

D. Montgomery, Markets in licenses and efficient pollution control programs, Journal of Economic Theory, vol.5, issue.3, pp.398-418, 1972.
DOI : 10.1016/0022-0531(72)90049-X

R. Newell, A. Jaffee, and R. Stavins, The Induced Innovation Hypothesis and Energy-Saving Technological Change, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol.114, issue.3, pp.941-975, 1999.
DOI : 10.1162/003355399556188

P. Segerstrom, The long-run growth effects of R&D subsidies, Journal of Economic Growth, vol.5, issue.3, pp.277-305, 2000.
DOI : 10.1023/A:1009881717993

T. M. Selden and S. Daqing, Neoclassical Growth, the J Curve for Abatement, and the Inverted U Curve for Pollution, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, vol.29, issue.2, pp.162-168, 1995.
DOI : 10.1006/jeem.1995.1038

R. Solow, J. Tobin, C. V. Weizsacker, and M. Yaari, Neoclassical Growth with Fixed Factor Proportions, The Review of Economic Studies, vol.33, issue.2, pp.79-115, 1966.
DOI : 10.2307/2974435

R. Van-der-ploeg and C. Withagen, Pollution control and the Ramsey problem, Environmental and Resource Economics, vol.38, issue.2, pp.215-236, 1991.
DOI : 10.1007/BF00310019

D. Wilson, Is Embodied Technology the Result of Upstream R&D? Industry-Level Evidence, Review of Economic Dynamics, vol.5, issue.2, pp.285-317, 2002.
DOI : 10.1006/redy.2002.0163

C. Withagen, Pollution, abatement and balanced growth, Environmental & Resource Economics, vol.94, issue.5, pp.1-8, 1995.
DOI : 10.1007/BF00691906
URL : http://repository.tue.nl/682759

Y. Yatsenko, R. Boucekkine, and N. Hritonenko, On explosive dynamics in R&D-based models of endogenous growth, Nonlinear Analysis: Theory, Methods & Applications, vol.71, issue.12, pp.693-700, 2009.
DOI : 10.1016/j.na.2008.11.068