Philosophical Enquiries into the Science of Sensibility

Abstract : This chapter places Burke's Philosophical Enquiry in its broader context of a culture of sensibility. The three sections of this introductory essay broadly correspond to the three sections of this book. The first part, 'Science and sensibility', provides a background to the writing of Burke's Philosophical Enquiry and how it fits into the medical and scientific study of sensibility. The writing of this text in its particular eighteenth-century culture reflects both a reaction to overly mechanistic world-views, on the one hand, and secondly, the necessity of verifying all theories in experience. Burke's contribution to the scientific core of the culture of sensibility consisted in an emphasis on nerves and feelings as well as physiological causes that could be recognised in the common person's experience. The second part, 'Sensibility, morals and manners', considers the moral implications of this physiological and psychological experience. On the one hand, by examining literary examples of Jane Austen and Samuel Richardson, it is shown that the experience of reading was considered an emotional and character-building enterprise. The result of reading novels could be called 'sentimental education'. Earlier eighteenth-century writers such as the Third Earl of Shaftesbury and Hutcheson attempted to bring together beauty and the good by defending a theory of 'moral sensibility', which would later be elaborated by Hume and Smith. Burke differs from this perspective by defending a distinction between virtue and beauty. On the other hand, Burke's physiological theory is closely tied to his view of morality. It is the sublime, through its tensions and labours, that more likely leads to virtue, in contrast to the indolence and relaxation of beauty. In the third part, 'Sensibility and aesthetics', it is further shown how the notion of taste and the arts developed in the eighteenth century. Behind this development were the ability to arouse emotions by means of words as well as rhetorical gestures and devices. Does everyone universally react in the same way to the same stimuli? The answer to this question is both scientific and aesthetic, requiring experimental methods to prove the probability of how art, music but also food, for instance, affect the human beings' sensible nature. The introductory essay ends with an analysis of the context in which the discussion about universality versus diversity arises vis à vis the 'standard of taste', in particular in the work of Burke and Hume.
Complete list of metadatas

https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00609384
Contributor : Koen Vermeir <>
Submitted on : Monday, July 18, 2011 - 10:07:13 PM
Last modification on : Thursday, February 21, 2019 - 12:22:02 PM
Long-term archiving on : Wednesday, October 19, 2011 - 2:31:06 AM

File

Vermeir-Deckard_-_Philosophica...
Files produced by the author(s)

Identifiers

  • HAL Id : halshs-00609384, version 1

Citation

Koen Vermeir, Michael Deckard. Philosophical Enquiries into the Science of Sensibility. Koen Vermeir and Michael Funk Deckard. The Science of Sensibility: Reading Burke's Philosophical Enquiry, Springer, pp.3-56, 2012. ⟨halshs-00609384⟩

Share

Metrics

Record views

368

Files downloads

2861