Spatial Econometrics, 1988. ,
DOI : 10.1002/9780470996249.ch15
Spatial Econometrics, Palgrave Handbook of Econometrics, pp.901-969, 2006. ,
DOI : 10.1002/9780470996249.ch15
Hierarchical Modeling and Analysis for Spatial Data, Monographs on Statistics and Applied Probability. Chapman and Hall/CRC, 2003. ,
DOI : 10.1201/9780203487808
On the theory and diplomacy of environmental treaty-making, Environmental and Resource Economics, vol.11, issue.3/4, pp.317-333, 1998. ,
DOI : 10.1023/A:1008243528330
Environment and Statecraft: The Strategy of Environmental Treaty- Making, 2003. ,
DOI : 10.1093/0199286094.001.0001
Rethinking climate change governance and its relationship to the world trading system. The World Economy, pp.1863-1882, 2011. ,
A Comparison of International and Domestic Sources of Global Governance Dynamics, British Journal of Political Science, vol.46, issue.03, pp.509-538, 2010. ,
DOI : 10.1177/0022002707313687
Why Cooperate? Public Goods, Economic Power, and the Montreal Protocol, Review of Economics and Statistics, vol.2, issue.2, pp.286-297, 2003. ,
DOI : 10.1016/0304-4076(95)01792-5
Event History Modeling: A Guide for Social Scientists Analytical Methods for Social Research, Climatic Change, vol.104, pp.3-4539, 2004. ,
DOI : 10.1017/CBO9780511790874
Parametric frailty and shared frailty survival models, Stata Journal, vol.2, issue.1, pp.22-44, 2002. ,
How international law works: A rational choice theory, 2008. ,
DOI : 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195305562.001.0001
The Econometric Analysis of Transition Data, 1992. ,
DOI : 10.1017/CCOL0521265967
Policy Monitor * Edited by Maureen Cropper * The Clean Development Mechanism: History, Status, and Prospects, Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, vol.1, issue.1, pp.134-151, 2007. ,
DOI : 10.1093/reep/rem004
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01072398
The importance of modeling spatial spillovers in??public??choice analysis, Public Choice, vol.129, issue.5, pp.3-4525, 2012. ,
DOI : 10.1007/s11127-010-9714-6
Did The Single Market Cause Competition in Excise Taxes? Evidence From EU Countries, The Economic Journal, vol.30, issue.4, pp.406-429, 2009. ,
DOI : 10.1111/j.1468-0297.2008.02235.x
INTERNATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL PROBLEMS, Oxford Review of Economic Policy, vol.6, issue.1, pp.80-108, 1990. ,
DOI : 10.1093/oxrep/6.1.80
: A Survey of Their Features, Formation, and Effects, Annual Review of Environment and Resources, vol.28, issue.1, pp.429-461, 2003. ,
DOI : 10.1146/annurev.energy.28.050302.105603
The voluntary provision of a pure public good: The case of reduced CFC emissions and the Montreal Protocol, Journal of Public Economics, vol.63, issue.3, pp.331-349, 1997. ,
DOI : 10.1016/S0047-2727(96)01598-8
Do Democracies Exhibit Stronger International Environmental Commitment? A Cross-country Analysis, Journal of Peace Research, vol.39, issue.2, pp.139-164, 2002. ,
DOI : 10.1177/0022343302039002001
Does trade openness promote multilateral environmental cooperation? The World Economy, pp.815-832, 2002. ,
Cheers, and concern, for new climate pact. The New York Time, 2004. ,
Noneconomic Engagement and International Exchange: The Case of Environmental Treaties, Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, vol.69, issue.2-3, pp.337-363, 2009. ,
DOI : 10.1111/j.1538-4616.2009.00208.x
Global and Regional Public Goods: A Prognosis for Collective Action, Fiscal Studies, vol.2, issue.3, pp.221-247, 1998. ,
DOI : 10.1016/0165-1765(83)90087-3
The Globalization of Liberalization: Policy Diffusion in the International Political Economy, American Political Science Review, vol.2, issue.01, pp.171-189, 2004. ,
DOI : 10.1086/226707
The International Law and Politics of Climate Change: Ratification of the United Nations Framework Convention and the Kyoto Protocol, Journal of Conflict Resolution, vol.52, issue.2, pp.243-268, 2008. ,
DOI : 10.1177/0022002707313692
Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data, 2001. ,
New-Zealand and the Kyoto protocol: Ideals, interests and politics, New Zealand International Review, issue.3, p.29, 2004. ,