B. Annexe, Résultats des Probit Tableau n°1B : Résultats des probit estimation du score de propension Ensemble Sans Mobilité Avec mobilité Docteurs Expatriés Caractéristiques individuelles Genre ref. Homme Femme -0, p.17

. Activité-dominante-ref and E. Autres-recherche, Essais 0,77*** 0,84*** 0,66*** 0,61*** 0,74*** Participation à un projet de l'UE 0

. Autre-industrie-0, 66*** 0,42*** 0,59*** 0,34*** 0,43*** 0,51** 0,51*** 0

A. Aakvik, Bounding a Matching Estimator: The Case of a Norwegian Training Program, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, vol.63, issue.1, pp.63115-143, 2001.
DOI : 10.1111/1468-0084.00211

T. Amabile, Creativity in Context: Update to the Social Psychology of Creativity, 1996.

M. B. Andreosso-o-'callaghan, Taxation and Innovation in the European Union, Korean Journal of EU Studies, vol.5, pp.1121-145, 2000.

G. P. Backer, M. C. Jensen, and K. J. Murphy, Compensation and Incentives: Practice vs, 1988.

D. B. Balkin and L. R. Gomez-mejia, DETERMINANTS OF R AND D COMPENSATION STRATEGIES IN THE HIGH TECH INDUSTRY, Personnel Psychology, vol.7, issue.4, pp.635-650, 1984.
DOI : 10.1016/0305-0483(75)90068-7

S. O. Becker and M. Caliendo, Sensitivity analysis for average treatment effects, The Stata Journal, vol.7, pp.171-83, 2007.

R. Bénabou and J. Tirole, Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivation, Review of Economic Studies, vol.70, issue.3, pp.3489-520, 2003.
DOI : 10.1111/1467-937X.00253

C. Bonnard, J. Bourdon, and J. J. Paul, Travailler dans la recherche priv??e au sortir d???une ??cole d???ing??nieur??: est-ce la bonne strat??gie???, Revue d?????conomie industrielle, issue.133, 2011.
DOI : 10.4000/rei.4926
URL : http://rei.revues.org/pdf/4926

T. Brodaty, B. Crépon, and D. Fougère, Les méthodes micro-économétriques d'évaluation et leurs applications aux politiques actives de l'emploi, Economie et Prévision, vol.1, pp.17793-118, 2007.

C. Burhop and T. Lübbers, Incentives and innovation? R&D management in Germany???s chemical and electrical engineering industries around 1900, Explorations in Economic History, vol.47, issue.1, pp.100-111, 2010.
DOI : 10.1016/j.eeh.2009.06.001

M. Caliendo and S. Kopeinig, SOME PRACTICAL GUIDANCE FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF PROPENSITY SCORE MATCHING, Journal of Economic Surveys, vol.136, issue.3, pp.131-72, 2008.
DOI : 10.1162/003465304323023705

W. Cohen and H. Sauerman, What makes them tick? Employee Motives and Industrial Innovation, 2008.

B. Crépon, E. Duguet, and J. Mairesse, Research, innovation, and productivity: an econometric analysis at the firm level, Economics of Innovation and New Technology, vol.7, pp.2115-158, 1998.
DOI : 10.3386/w6696

M. Dahl, Embedded knowledge flows through labor mobility in regional clusters in Denmark, Presented at DRUID's New Economy Conference, 2002.

P. Dasgupta and P. David, Toward a New Economics of Science, Research Policy, vol.23, pp.487-521, 1994.

E. L. Deci, Intrinsic motivation, 1975.

A. Dupuy and W. Smits, How large is the compensating wage differential for R&D workers?, Economics of Innovation and New Technology, vol.43, issue.5, 2009.
DOI : 10.1287/mnsc.1040.0241

F. Ederer and G. Manso, Is pay-for performance detrimental to innovation?, 2009.

K. M. Eisenhardt, Agency theory: an assessment review, The Academy of Management Review, vol.14, pp.157-74, 1989.
DOI : 10.2307/258191

E. Fama, Agency Problems and the Theory of the Firm, Journal of Political Economy, vol.88, issue.2, pp.288-307, 1980.
DOI : 10.1086/260866

B. Francis, I. Hasan, and Z. Sharma, Do incentives create innovation? Evidence from CEO compensation contracts, Working Paper, 2009.
DOI : 10.2139/ssrn.1953947

B. S. Frey, Awards as compensation, European Management Review, vol.48, issue.1, pp.6-14, 2007.
DOI : 10.1057/palgrave.emr.1500068

B. S. Frey and R. Jegen, Motivation Crowding Theory, Journal of Economic Surveys, vol.15, issue.5, pp.5589-611, 2001.
DOI : 10.1111/1467-6419.00150
URL : http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.390.5326

B. S. Frey and M. Osterloh, Successful management by motivation. Balancing Intrinsic and Extrinsic Incentives, 2002.

M. Frölich, Propensity score matching without conditional independence assumption?with an application to the gender wage gap in the United Kingdom, The Econometrics Journal, vol.5, issue.2, pp.359-407, 2007.
DOI : 10.1111/1468-0262.00083

G. George, S. A. Zahra, and D. R. Wood, The effects of business???university alliances on innovative output and financial performance: a study of publicly traded biotechnology companies, Journal of Business Venturing, vol.17, issue.6, pp.577-609, 2002.
DOI : 10.1016/S0883-9026(01)00069-6

H. Gersbach and A. Schmultzler, Endogenous technical spillovers: causes and consequences, Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, vol.12, pp.2179-205, 2003.
DOI : 10.1162/105864003766754198
URL : http://www.zora.uzh.ch/1162/1/Gersbach_2003V.pdf

M. Gibbs and A. Levenson, The Economic Approach to Personnel Research, SSRN Electronic Journal, vol.dans S, 2002.
DOI : 10.2139/ssrn.243634

. Giuri, Inventors and invention processes in Europe: Results from the PatVal-EU survey, Research Policy, vol.36, issue.8, pp.1107-1127, 2007.
DOI : 10.1016/j.respol.2007.07.008

B. J. Hall and K. J. Murphy, The Trouble with Stock Options, The Journal of Economic Perspectives, vol.17, pp.349-70, 2003.

D. Harhoff and K. Hoisl, Institutionalized incentives for ingenuity???Patent value and the German Employees??? Inventions Act, Research Policy, vol.36, issue.8, pp.81143-1162, 2007.
DOI : 10.1016/j.respol.2007.07.010

J. Heckman, H. Ichimura, and P. Todd, Matching As An Econometric Evaluation Estimator, Review of Economic Studies, vol.65, issue.2, pp.605-654, 1997.
DOI : 10.1111/1467-937X.00044
URL : http://restud.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/65/2/261

J. Heckman, H. Ichimura, and P. Todd, Matching As An Econometric Evaluation Estimator, Review of Economic Studies, vol.65, issue.2, pp.261-294, 1998.
DOI : 10.1111/1467-937X.00044
URL : http://restud.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/65/2/261

K. Hoisl, A closer look at inventive output, the role of age and career paths, 2007.

K. Hoisl, Tracing mobile inventors???The causality between inventor mobility and inventor productivity, Research Policy, vol.36, issue.5, pp.619-636, 2007.
DOI : 10.1016/j.respol.2007.01.009

T. P. Holmstrom, Moral Hazard and Observability, The Bell Journal of Economics, vol.10, issue.1, pp.74-91, 1979.
DOI : 10.2307/3003320
URL : http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.295.3319

S. Honig-haftel and L. Martin, The effectiveness of reward systems on innovative output: An empirical analysis, Small Business Economics, vol.75, issue.5, pp.4261-269, 1993.
DOI : 10.1007/BF01516247

C. I. Jones, Growth and Ideas, Handbook of Economic Growth, 2005.

B. Kim and H. Oh, An effective R&D performance measurement system: survey of Korean R&D researchers, Omega, vol.30, issue.1, pp.19-31, 2002.
DOI : 10.1016/S0305-0483(01)00049-4

D. M. Kreps, Intrinsic Motivation and Extrinsic Incentives, The American Economic Review, vol.87, pp.2359-364, 1997.

J. Kochanski and G. Ledford, How to keep me: Retaining technical professionals, Research-Technology Management, pp.31-38, 2001.

N. Lacetera and L. Zirulia, Knowledge spillovers, Competition, and Taste for Science in a Model of R&D Incentive Provision, 2008.

S. Lach and M. Schankerman, Incentives and invention in universities, The Rand Journal of Economics, vol.39, pp.2403-433, 2008.

E. E. Lawler, Reward Systems in Knowledge-based Organizations, 2003.

M. A. Hitt and . Denisi, Managing knowledge for sustained competitive advantage: Designing strategies for effective human resource management, pp.274-302

E. Leuven and B. Sianesi, PSMATCH2: Stata module to perform full Mahalanobis and propensity score matching, common support graphing, and covariate imbalance testing, 2003.

J. Lerner and J. Wulf, Innovation and Incentives: Evidence from Corporate R&D, Review of Economics and Statistics, vol.13, issue.4, pp.634-644, 2007.
DOI : 10.2307/2330757

S. G. Levin and P. E. Stephan, Research productivity over the cycle life: evidence for academic scientists, The American Economic Review, vol.81, pp.1-114, 1991.

J. P. Liebeskind, Knowledge, strategy, and the theory of the firm, Strategic Management Journal, vol.22, issue.5, pp.93-107, 1996.
DOI : 10.1002/smj.4250171109

M. Mariani and M. Romanelli, ???Stacking??? and ???picking??? inventions: The patenting behavior of European inventors, Research Policy, vol.36, issue.8, pp.1128-1142, 2007.
DOI : 10.1016/j.respol.2007.07.009

J. Mairesse and P. Mohnen, The Importance of R&D for Innovation: A Reassessment Using French Survey Data, The Journal of Technology Transfer, vol.13, issue.2, pp.183-197, 2005.
DOI : 10.1007/s10961-004-4365-8

G. S. Mcmillan, Gender differences in patenting activity: An examination of the US biotechnology industry, Scientometrics, vol.12, issue.3, pp.3683-691, 2009.
DOI : 10.1007/s11192-008-2101-0

H. Mehran and D. Yermack, Compensation and Top Management Turnover, 1999.

A. Mendez, Vers une globalisation de la gestion des ressources humaines?, Cahiers Français, vol.333, pp.38-43, 2006.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00102106

R. Merton, The Sociology of Science, 1973.

J. Moen, Is mobility of technical personnel a source of R&D spillovers?, Journal of Labor Economics, vol.23, pp.181-114, 2005.

M. Osterloh, Human Resources Management and Knowledge Creation, dans Nonaka I, 2005.

I. Kazuo, Handbook of Knowledge Creation

P. Oyer and S. Schaefer, Why do some firms give stock options to all employees?: An empirical examination of alternative theories, Journal of Financial Economics, vol.76, pp.199-133, 2005.

A. Pakes and S. Nitzan, Optimum Contracts for Research Personnel, Research Employment, and the Establishment of "Rival" Enterprises, Journal of Labor Economics, vol.1, issue.4, pp.345-365, 1983.
DOI : 10.1086/298017

C. Prendergast, The Provision of Incentives in Firms, Journal of Economic Literature, vol.37, issue.1, pp.17-63, 1999.
DOI : 10.1257/jel.37.1.7

S. Radhakrishnan and J. Ronen, Job challenge as a motivator in a principal???agent setting, European Journal of Operational Research, vol.115, issue.1, pp.138-157, 1999.
DOI : 10.1016/S0377-2217(98)00198-2

M. Roach and H. Sauerman, A taste for science? PhD scientists??? academic orientation and self-selection into research careers in industry, Research Policy, vol.39, issue.3, pp.3422-434, 2010.
DOI : 10.1016/j.respol.2010.01.004

P. Rosenbaum and D. Rubin, The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects, Biometrika, vol.70, issue.1, pp.41-55, 1983.
DOI : 10.1093/biomet/70.1.41

P. Rosenbaum, Observational studies, 2002.

J. Rossman, The Motives of Inventors, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol.45, issue.3, pp.3-522, 1931.
DOI : 10.2307/1883903

F. T. Rothaermel and A. M. Hess, Building Dynamic Capabilities: Innovation Driven by Individual-, Firm-, and Network-Level Effects, Organization Science, vol.18, issue.6, pp.6898-921, 2007.
DOI : 10.1287/orsc.1070.0291

S. C. Salop, A Model of the Natural Rate of Unemployment, American Economic Review, vol.69, pp.117-125, 1979.
DOI : 10.1017/CBO9780511559594.007

C. Shapiro and J. E. Stiglitz, Equilibrium Unemployment as a Worker Discipline Device, The American Economic Review, vol.74, pp.3433-444, 1984.
DOI : 10.1017/CBO9780511559594.004

J. Smith and P. Todd, Does Matching Overcome Lalonde's Critique of Nonexperimental Estimators?, SSRN Electronic Journal, vol.125, pp.1-2, 2005.
DOI : 10.2139/ssrn.286297

S. Stern, Do scientists pay to be scientists?, Management Science, vol.50, pp.6-835, 2004.
DOI : 10.3386/w7410
URL : http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.159.6981

H. L. Tosi and L. R. Gomez-mejia, The Decoupling of CEO Pay and Performance: An Agency Theory Perspective, Administrative Science Quarterly, vol.34, issue.2, pp.169-189, 1989.
DOI : 10.2307/2989894

M. A. Titus, Detecting selection bias, using propensity score matching, and estimating treatment effects: an application to the private returns to a master???s degree, Research in Higher Education, pp.7487-521, 2007.
DOI : 10.1007/s11162-006-9034-3

M. Traijtenberg, Recombinant ideas: the mobility of inventors and the productivity of research, CEPR-Conference, 2005.

K. Whittington and L. Smith-doerr, Gender and Commercial Science: Women???s Patenting in the Life Sciences, The Journal of Technology Transfer, vol.88, issue.1, pp.355-370, 2005.
DOI : 10.1007/s10961-005-2581-5

T. R. Zenger, Explaining Organizational Diseconomies of Scale in R&D: Agency Problems and the Allocation of Engineering Talent, Ideas, and Effort by Firm Size, Management Science, vol.40, issue.6, pp.6708-729, 1994.
DOI : 10.1287/mnsc.40.6.708

T. R. Zenger and S. G. Lazzarini, Compensating for innovation: Do small firms offer high-powered incentives that lure talent and motivate effort?, Managerial and Decision Economics, vol.25, issue.67, pp.329-345, 2004.
DOI : 10.1002/mde.1194