D. Aadland, A. Caplan, and O. Phillips, A Bayesian examination of information and uncertainty in contingent valuation, Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, vol.78, issue.2, pp.149-178, 2007.
DOI : 10.1007/s11166-007-9022-9

D. Aadland and A. J. Caplan, Willingness to Pay for Curbside Recycling with Detection and Mitigation of HypotheticalBias, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, vol.85, issue.2, pp.492-502, 2003.
DOI : 10.1111/1467-8276.00136

D. Aadland and A. J. Caplan, Cheap talk reconsidered: New evidence from CVM, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, vol.60, issue.4, pp.562-578, 2006.
DOI : 10.1016/j.jebo.2004.09.006

I. Ajzen, T. C. Brown, and F. Carvajal, Explaining the Discrepancy between Intentions and Actions: The Case of Hypothetical Bias in Contingent Valuation, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, vol.30, issue.9, pp.1108-1120, 2004.
DOI : 10.1177/0146167204264079

D. Albarracìn, J. C. Gillette, A. N. Earl, L. R. Glasman, M. R. Durantini et al., A Test of Major Assumptions About Behavior Change: A Comprehensive Look at the Effects of Passive and Active HIV-Prevention Interventions Since the Beginning of the Epidemic., Psychological Bulletin, vol.131, issue.6, pp.856-897, 2005.
DOI : 10.1037/0033-2909.131.6.856

G. Allport, Coping with Preference Anomalies in CostóBenefit Analysis: A Market-Simulation Approach, 1968.

F. Alpizar, F. Carlsson, and O. Johansson-stenman, Anonymity, reciprocity, and conformity: Evidence from voluntary contributions to a national park in Costa Rica, Journal of Public Economics, vol.92, issue.5-6, pp.5-6, 2008.
DOI : 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2007.11.004

D. Ami, F. Aprahamian, O. Chanel, and S. Luchini, A Test of Cheap Talk in Different Hypothetical Contexts: The Case of Air Pollution, Environmental and Resource Economics, vol.29, issue.2/3, p.9, 2009.
DOI : 10.1007/s10640-011-9464-z
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00382511

K. Arrow, Rationality of Self and Others in an Economic System, The Journal of Business, vol.59, issue.S4, 1987.
DOI : 10.1086/296376

K. Arrow, R. Solow, P. R. Portney, E. E. Leamer, R. Radner et al., Report of the noaa panel on contingent valuation, Federal Register, vol.58, issue.10, pp.4601-4614, 1993.

D. Batson, Altruism and Prosocial Behavior, Handbook of Social Psychology, vol.36, issue.1, pp.282-316, 1998.
DOI : 10.1002/0471264385.wei0519

D. Bjornstad, R. Cummings, and L. Osborne, A learning design for reducing hypothetical bias in the contingent valuation method, Environmental and Resource Economics, vol.10, issue.3, pp.207-221, 1997.
DOI : 10.1023/A:1026423201797

R. K. Blamey, J. W. Bennett, and M. D. Morrison, Yea-Saying in Contingent Valuation Surveys, Land Economics, vol.75, issue.1, pp.126-141, 1999.
DOI : 10.2307/3146997

K. Blumenschein, G. C. Blomquist, M. Johannesson, N. Horn, and P. Freeman, Eliciting Willingness to Pay Without Bias: Evidence from a Field Experiment*, The Economic Journal, vol.49, issue.1, pp.114-137, 2008.
DOI : 10.1111/j.1468-0297.2007.02106.x

P. Bohm, Estimating demand for public goods: An experiment, European Economic Review, vol.3, issue.2, pp.111-130, 1972.
DOI : 10.1016/0014-2921(72)90001-3

S. Bowles, Endogenous preferences: The cultural consequences of markets and other economic institutions, Journal of Economic Literature, vol.36, issue.1, pp.75-111, 1998.

S. Bowles, Individual interactions, group conflicts, and the evolution of preferences, Social Dynamics, pp.155-190, 2002.

T. C. Brown, I. Ajzen, and D. Hrubes, Further tests of entreaties to avoid hypothetical bias in referendum contingent valuation, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, vol.46, issue.2, pp.353-361, 2003.
DOI : 10.1016/S0095-0696(02)00041-4

J. M. Burger, The Foot-in-the-Door Compliance Procedure: A Multiple-Process Analysis and Review, Personality and Social Psychology Review, vol.9, issue.4, pp.303-325, 1999.
DOI : 10.1207/s15327957pspr0304_2

F. Carlsson and P. Martinsson, Do experience and cheap talk influence willingness to pay in an openended contingent valuation survey?, 0190.

R. Carson, T. Groves, J. List, and M. Machina, Probabilistic influence and supplemental benefits: A field test of the two key assumptions underlying stated preferences. Working Paper, 2002.

R. Carson, T. Groves, and M. Machina, Incentive and informational properties of preference questions, Environmental and Resource Economics, vol.51, issue.1, 2000.
DOI : 10.1007/s10640-007-9124-5

P. A. Champ, R. C. Bishop, T. C. Brown, and D. W. Mccollum, Using Donation Mechanisms to Value Nonuse Benefits from Public Goods, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, vol.33, issue.2, pp.151-162, 1997.
DOI : 10.1006/jeem.1997.0988

G. Charness and M. Dufwenberg, Promises and Partnership, Econometrica, vol.74, issue.6, pp.1579-1601, 2006.
DOI : 10.1111/j.1468-0262.2006.00719.x
URL : http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.178.9784

T. Cherry and J. Shogren, Self-interest, sympathy and the origin of endowments, Economics Letters, vol.101, issue.1, pp.69-72, 2008.
DOI : 10.1016/j.econlet.2008.04.007

W. Congdon, J. Kling, and S. Mullainathan, Behavioral economics and tax policy, national Bureau of Economic Research, 2009.

R. G. Cummings, G. W. Harrison, and L. L. Osborne, Can the bias of contingent valuation be reduced? evidence from the laboratory, Economics Working Paper, 1995.

R. G. Cummings and L. O. Taylor, Does Realism Matter in Contingent Valuation Surveys?, Land Economics, vol.74, issue.2, pp.203-215, 1998.
DOI : 10.2307/3147051

R. G. Cummings and L. O. Taylor, Unbiased Value Estimates for Environmental Goods: A Cheap Talk Design for the Contingent Valuation Method, American Economic Review, vol.89, issue.3, pp.649-665, 1999.
DOI : 10.1257/aer.89.3.649

R. Dawes and T. Smith, Attitude and opinion measurement Handbook of social psychology Random House, pp.509-566, 1985.

P. A. Diamond and J. A. Hausman, Contingent Valuation: Is Some Number Better than No Number?, Journal of Economic Perspectives, vol.8, issue.4, pp.45-64, 1994.
DOI : 10.1257/jep.8.4.45

M. R. Durantini, D. Albarracìn, A. L. Mitchell, A. N. Earl, and J. C. Gillette, Conceptualizing the influence of social agents of behavior change: A meta-analysis of the effectiveness of HIV-prevention interventionists for different groups., Psychological Bulletin, vol.132, issue.2, pp.212-248, 2006.
DOI : 10.1037/0033-2909.132.2.212

T. Ellingsen and M. Johannesson, Promises, Threats and Fairness*, The Economic Journal, vol.94, issue.2, pp.397-420, 2004.
DOI : 10.1006/jeth.2001.2803
URL : http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.198.80

N. Epley, D. Mak, and L. Idson, Bonus of rebate?: the impact of income framing on spending and saving, Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, vol.101, issue.1, pp.213-227, 2006.
DOI : 10.1002/bdm.519

R. Farr and S. Moscovici, Social Representations, 1984.

E. Flachaire and G. Hollard, Individual sensitivity to framing effects, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, vol.67, issue.1, pp.296-307, 2008.
DOI : 10.1016/j.jebo.2006.10.006
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00598266

E. Flachaire, G. Hollard, and S. Luchini, Heterogeneous anchoring in dichotomous choice valuation frameweork, Louvain Economic Review, vol.73, issue.4, pp.369-384, 2007.

J. A. Fox, J. F. Shogren, D. J. Hayes, and J. B. Kliebenstein, CVM-X: Calibrating Contingent Values with Experimental Auction Markets, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, vol.80, issue.3, pp.455-465, 1998.
DOI : 10.2307/1244548
URL : http://ajae.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/80/3/455

A. M. Freeman, The Measurements of Environmental and Resource Values: Theory and Methods. Resources for the Future Press, 2003.

B. S. Frey and F. Oberholzer-gee, The cost of price incentives: An empirical analysis of motivation crowding-out, American Economic Review, vol.87, issue.4, pp.746-755, 1997.

B. G. Greenberg, A. A. Abul-ela, W. R. Simmons, and D. G. Horvitz, The Unrelated Question Randomized Response Model: Theoretical Framework, Journal of the American Statistical Association, vol.64, issue.326, pp.520-539, 1969.
DOI : 10.1080/01621459.1965.10480775

B. Greiner, An online recruitment system for economic experiments, Forschung und wissenschaftliches Rechnen 2003. GWDG Bericht 63. Ges. für Wiss. Datenverarbeitung, pp.79-93, 2004.

D. Grether, Bayes Rule as a Descriptive Model: The Representativeness Heuristic, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol.95, issue.3, pp.537-57, 1980.
DOI : 10.2307/1885092

G. W. Harrison, R. M. Harstad, and E. E. Rutström, Experimental Methods and Elicitation of Values, Experimental Economics, vol.7, issue.2, pp.123-140, 2004.
DOI : 10.1023/B:EXEC.0000026975.48587.f0

A. Hatcher, S. Jaffry, O. Thébaud, and E. Bennett, Normative and Social Influences Affecting Compliance with Fishery Regulations, Land Economics, vol.76, issue.3, pp.448-461, 2000.
DOI : 10.2307/3147040

J. Herriges and J. Shogren, Starting Point Bias in Dichotomous Choice Valuation with Follow-Up Questioning, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, vol.30, issue.1, pp.112-131, 1996.
DOI : 10.1006/jeem.1996.0008

G. Hollard and S. Luchini, Théorie du choix social et représentation: analyse d'une enquête sur le tourisme vert en camargue, GREQAM WP, issue.06, p.99, 1999.

N. Jacquemet, R. Joule, S. Luchini, and J. Shogren, Earned wealth, engaged bidders? Evidence from a second-price auction, Economics Letters, vol.105, issue.1, pp.36-38, 2009.
DOI : 10.1016/j.econlet.2009.05.010
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00429894

N. Jacquemet, R. Joule, S. Luchini, and J. Shogren, Eliciting preferences under oath, CES Working paper, issue.43, p.9, 2009.

N. Jacquemet, R. Joule, S. Luchini, and J. Shogren, Do People Always Pay Less Than They Say? Testbed Laboratory Experiments with IV and HG Values, Journal of Public Economic Theory, vol.35, issue.2, 2010.
DOI : 10.1111/j.1467-9779.2011.01522.x
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00443668

R. Joule and J. Beauvois, La soumission librement consentie, 1998.
DOI : 10.3917/puf.beauv.2010.01

R. Joule and J. Beauvois, Petit traité de manipulation à l'usage des honnêtes gens, 2002.

R. Joule, F. Bernard, and S. Halimi-falkowicz, Promoting ecocitizenship : in favor of binding communication, International Scientific Journal for Alternative Energy and Ecology, vol.6, issue.62, pp.214-218, 2008.

R. Joule, F. Girandola, and F. Bernard, How Can People Be Induced to Willingly Change Their Behavior? The Path from Persuasive Communication to Binding Communication, Social and Personality Psychology Compass, vol.1, issue.1, pp.493-505, 2007.
DOI : 10.1111/j.1559-1816.1990.tb00411.x
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00585299

J. Kagel, Auctions: A survey of experimental research Handbook of Experimental Economics, pp.501-585, 1995.

R. Katzev and T. Wang, Can commitment change behavior ? a case study of environmental actions, Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, vol.9, pp.13-26, 1994.

C. Kiesler and J. Sakumura, A test of a model for commitment., Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, vol.3, issue.3, pp.349-353, 1966.
DOI : 10.1037/h0022943

P. Kollock, Social Dilemmas: The Anatomy of Cooperation, Annual Review of Sociology, vol.24, issue.1, pp.183-214, 1998.
DOI : 10.1146/annurev.soc.24.1.183

M. J. Kotchen and S. D. Reiling, Do Reminders of Substitutes and Budget Constraints Influence Contingent Valuation Estimates? Another Comment, Land Economics, vol.75, issue.3, pp.478-482, 1999.
DOI : 10.2307/3147192

J. Kulik and P. Carlino, The effect of verbal commitment and treatment choice on medication compliance in a pediatric setting, Journal of Behavioral Medicine, vol.3, issue.4, pp.367-376, 1987.
DOI : 10.1007/BF00846476

J. A. List, Do Explicit Warnings Eliminate the Hypothetical Bias in Elicitation Procedures? Evidence from Field Auctions for Sportscards, American Economic Review, vol.91, issue.5, pp.1498-1507, 2001.
DOI : 10.1257/aer.91.5.1498

J. A. List, The Nature and Extent of Discrimination in the Marketplace: Evidence from the Field, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol.119, issue.1, pp.49-89, 2004.
DOI : 10.1162/003355304772839524

J. Loomis, A. Gonzalez-caban, and R. Gregory, Do Reminders of Substitutes and Budget Constraints Influence Contingent Valuation Estimates?, Land Economics, vol.70, issue.4, pp.499-506, 1994.
DOI : 10.2307/3146643

S. Luchini, Preferences Elicitation in Non-Market Environments: Application to Environmental Assets, 2000.

J. Lusk and J. Shogren, Experimental Auctions: Methods and Applications in Economic and Marketing Research, 2007.
DOI : 10.1017/CBO9780511611261

J. L. Lusk, Effects of Cheap Talk on Consumer Willingness-to-Pay for Golden Rice, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, vol.85, issue.4, pp.840-856, 2003.
DOI : 10.1111/1467-8276.00492

M. Morrison and T. Brown, Testing the Effectiveness of Certainty Scales, Cheap Talk, and Dissonance-Minimization in Reducing Hypothetical Bias in Contingent Valuation Studies, Environmental and Resource Economics, vol.32, issue.2, pp.307-326, 2009.
DOI : 10.1007/s10640-009-9287-3

S. Moscovici, La psychoanalyse, son image et son public, 1961.
DOI : 10.3917/puf.mosco.2004.01

P. Mozumder and R. P. Berrens, Investigating hypothetical bias: induced-value tests of the referendum voting mechanism with uncertainty, Applied Economics Letters, vol.3, issue.10, pp.705-709, 2007.
DOI : 10.1016/S0165-1765(00)00410-9

J. J. Murphy, T. Stevens, and D. Weatherhead, Is Cheap Talk Effective at Eliminating Hypothetical Bias in a Provision Point Mechanism?, Environmental & Resource Economics, vol.27, issue.2, pp.327-343, 2005.
DOI : 10.1007/s10640-004-4224-y

H. R. Neill, R. G. Cummings, P. T. Ganderton, G. W. Harrison, and T. Mcguckin, Hypothetical Surveys and Real Economic Commitments, Land Economics, vol.70, issue.2, pp.145-154, 1994.
DOI : 10.2307/3146318

M. Pallack, D. Cook, and J. Sullivan, Commitment and energy conservation Applied Social Psychology Annual, pp.235-253, 1980.

A. Peterson, K. Kealey, S. Mann, P. Marek, and I. Sarason, Hutchinson Smoking Prevention Project: Long-Term Randomized Trial in School-Based Tobacco Use Prevention--Results on Smoking, Journal of the National Cancer Institute, vol.92, issue.24, pp.1979-199, 2000.
DOI : 10.1093/jnci/92.24.1979

G. L. Poe, J. E. Clark, D. Rondeau, and W. D. Schulze, Provision point mechanisms and field validity tests of contingent valuation, Environmental and Resource Economics, vol.23, issue.1, pp.105-131, 2002.
DOI : 10.1023/A:1020242907259

E. E. Rutström, Home-grown values and incentive compatible auction design, International Journal of Game Theory, vol.27, issue.3, pp.427-441, 1998.
DOI : 10.1007/s001820050082

T. Schelling, The strategy of conflict, 1960.

V. Smith, Constructivist and Ecological Rationality in Economics, American Economic Review, vol.93, issue.3, pp.465-508, 2003.
DOI : 10.1257/000282803322156954

A. R. Soetevent, Anonymity in giving in a natural context???a field experiment in 30 churches, Journal of Public Economics, vol.89, issue.11-12, pp.11-12, 2005.
DOI : 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2004.11.002

C. L. Spash and A. Biel, Social psychology and economics in environmental research, Journal of Economic Psychology, vol.23, issue.5, pp.551-555, 2002.
DOI : 10.1016/S0167-4870(02)00116-2

R. Sudgen, Coping with preference anomalies in costóbenefit analysis: A market-simulation approach, Environmental and Resource Economics, vol.32, issue.1, pp.129-150, 2005.

J. Thøgersen, Social norms and cooperation in real-life social dilemmas, Journal of Economic Psychology, vol.29, issue.4, pp.458-472, 2008.
DOI : 10.1016/j.joep.2007.12.004

A. Vatn, Cooperative behavior and institutions, The Journal of Socio-Economics, vol.38, issue.1, pp.188-196, 2009.
DOI : 10.1016/j.socec.2008.07.011
URL : http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.535.3427

W. Vickrey, COUNTERSPECULATION, AUCTIONS, AND COMPETITIVE SEALED TENDERS, The Journal of Finance, vol.16, issue.1, pp.8-37, 1961.
DOI : 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1961.tb02789.x

C. A. Vossler and M. F. Evans, Bridging the gap between the field and the lab: Environmental goods, policy maker input, and consequentiality, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, vol.58, issue.3, pp.338-345, 2009.
DOI : 10.1016/j.jeem.2009.04.007

M. V. Vugt, Averting the Tragedy of the Commons, Current Directions in Psychological Science, vol.8, issue.3, pp.169-173, 2009.
DOI : 10.1037/0022-3514.73.4.733

T. Wang and R. Katsev, Group Commitment and Resource Conservation: Two Field Experiments on Promoting Recycling1, Journal of Applied Social Psychology, vol.13, issue.4, pp.265-275, 1990.
DOI : 10.1037/h0036195

J. C. Whitehead and G. C. Blomquist, Do Reminders of Substitutes and Budget Constraints Influence Contingent Valuation Estimates? Comment, Land Economics, vol.71, issue.4, pp.541-543, 1995.
DOI : 10.2307/3146719

J. C. Whitehead and G. C. Blomquist, Do Reminders of Substitutes and Budget Constraints Influence Contingent Valuation Estimates? Reply to Another Comment, Land Economics, vol.75, issue.3, pp.483-484, 1999.
DOI : 10.2307/3147193

E. Yoeli, Does social approval stimulate prosocial behavior? evidence from a field experiment in the residential electricity market, 2008.

R. Zeiliger, A presentation of regate, internet based software for experimental economics, 2000.