A. Research-council-?abelson and P. , The Ranking of Economics Journals by the Economic Society of Australia, Economic Papers: A journal of applied economics and policy, vol.1, issue.6, pp.176-180, 2009.
DOI : 10.1111/j.1759-3441.2009.00020.x

?. Tiers, Tiers for the Australian Ranking of Journals, 2008.

C. ?donovan-donovan, A Review of Current Australian and International Practice in Measuring the Quality and Impact of Publicly Funded Research in the Humanities, REPP discussion paper 05, p.37, 2005.

J. Shanks, G. Lamp, and J. , ERA replaces RQF, Australasian Journal of Information systems, vol.25, issue.2, pp.5-6, 2008.

?. Sumguide, Summary guidelines, 2007.

?. Revsumguide, Revisted ERIH summary guidelines, 2007.

?. Reply, A reply to the Criticismresearch-areas/humanities/erih-european-reference-index-for-thehumanities/joint-response-to-criticism .html), 2008.

?. Histphiloscilist, Argument accompanying the History and Philosophy of science journals list (http://www.aeresevaluation.fr/content/download, 2009.

?. Psylist, Argument accompanying the Psychology-Ethology-Ergonomics journals list (http://www.aeresevaluation .fr/content/download, 2009.

?. Sociodemolist, Argument accompanying the Sociology-Demography journals list (http://www.aeresevaluation .fr/content/download, 2009.

H. ?annales, Editorial: Classer, évaluer, pp.1-4, 2008.

O. Auranen and M. Nieminen, University research funding and publication performance???An international comparison, Research Policy, vol.39, issue.6, pp.822-834, 2010.
DOI : 10.1016/j.respol.2010.03.003

C. Bazerman, Shaping written knowledge: the genre and activity of the experimental article in science, 1988.

M. J. Berry, A. Hagberg, and R. Chute, Une technologie invisible ? L'impact des instruments de gestion sur l'évolution des systèmes humains. Paris, http://crg.polytechnique.fr/fichiers A principal component analysis of 39 scientific impact measures, PloS one, vol.4, issue.6, p.6022, 1983.

G. C. Bowker and S. L. Star, Sorting things out. Classification and its consequences, 1999.

T. Brinn, M. J. Jones, and M. Pendlebury, Measuring research quality: peer review 1, citation indices 0, Omega, vol.28, issue.2, pp.237-239, 2000.
DOI : 10.1016/S0305-0483(99)00048-1

L. Butler, What happens when funding is linked to publication counts? In Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research, pp.389-405, 2004.

L. Butler, Using a balanced approach to bibliometrics: quantitative performance measures in the Australian Research Quality Framework, Ethics in Science and Environmental Politics, vol.8, pp.83-92, 2008.
DOI : 10.3354/esep00077

L. Butler and I. Mcallister, Metrics or Peer Review? Evaluating the 2001 UK Research Assessment Exercise in Political Science, Political Studies Review, vol.56, issue.6, pp.3-17, 2009.
DOI : 10.1111/j.1478-9299.2008.00167.x

J. M. Campanario, Peer Review for Journals as it Stands Today--Part 1, Science Communication, vol.19, issue.3, pp.181-211, 1998.
DOI : 10.1177/1075547098019003002

I. Castles, Australian standard research classification. A set of classifications for R1D projects, Australian Bureau of Statistics, 1993.

B. G. Charlton and P. Andras, Evaluating universities using simple scientometric research-output metrics: total citation counts per university for a retrospective seven-year rolling sample, Science and Public Policy, vol.34, issue.8, pp.34-555, 2007.
DOI : 10.3152/030234207X254413

S. Cole, The Hierarchy of the Sciences?, American Journal of Sociology, vol.89, issue.1, pp.111-139, 1983.
DOI : 10.1086/227835

C. Donovan, The Governance of Social Science and Everyday Epistemology, Public Administration, vol.7, issue.3, pp.597-615, 2005.
DOI : 10.1016/S0048-7333(98)00049-3

W. N. Espeland and M. Sauder, Rankings and Reactivity: How Public Measures Recreate Social Worlds, American Journal of Sociology, vol.113, issue.1, pp.1-40, 2007.
DOI : 10.1086/517897

E. Garfield, What is a Significant Journal? Current Contents, pp.106-107, 1970.

E. Giménez-toledo, A. Román-román, and M. D. Alcain-partearroyo, From experimentation to coordination in the evaluation of Spanish scientific journals in the humanities and social sciences, Research Evaluation, vol.16, issue.2, pp.137-148, 2007.
DOI : 10.3152/095820207X220409

E. Giménez-toledo and A. Román-román, Assessment of humanities and social sciences monographs through their publishers: a review and a study towards a model of evaluation, Research Evaluation, vol.18, issue.3, pp.201-213, 2009.
DOI : 10.3152/095820209X471986

J. Gläser, Why are the Most Influential Books in Australian Sociology not Necessarily the Most Highly Cited Ones?, Journal of Sociology, vol.73, issue.3, pp.261-282, 2004.
DOI : 10.1177/1440783304046370

J. Gläser and G. Laudel, Advantages and dangers of ???remote??? peer evaluation, Research Evaluation, vol.14, issue.3, pp.141-54, 2005.
DOI : 10.3152/147154405781776085

H. Grupp and M. E. Mogee, Indicators for national science and technology policy. T heir Development, Use, and Possible Misuse, Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research, pp.75-94, 2004.
DOI : 10.1007/1-4020-2755-9_4

S. Hix, A Global Ranking of Political Science Departments, Political Studies Review, vol.16, issue.3, pp.293-313, 2004.
DOI : 10.1111/j.1478-9299.2004.00011.x

R. Hogler and M. A. Gross, Journal Rankings and Academic Research: Two Discourses About the Quality of Faculty Work, Management Communication Quarterly, vol.23, issue.1, pp.107-126, 2009.
DOI : 10.1177/0893318909335419

P. Kalaitzidakis, T. P. Mamuneas, and T. Stengos, European economics: An analysis based on publications in the core journals, European Economic Review, vol.43, issue.4-6, pp.1150-1168, 1999.
DOI : 10.1016/S0014-2921(99)00019-7

D. N. Laband, A Ranking of the Top Canadian Economics Departments by Research Productivity of Graduates, The Canadian Journal of Economics, vol.18, issue.4, pp.904-907, 1985.
DOI : 10.2307/135100

M. Lamont, How professors think : inside the curious world of academic judgment, 2009.
DOI : 10.4159/9780674054158

F. S. Lee, The Ranking Game, Class, and Scholarship in American Mainstream Economics, Journal of Economics, vol.3, pp.1-41, 2006.

F. S. Lee, A Case for Ranking Heterodox Journals and Departments. On the Horizon, pp.241-251, 2008.

L. Leydesdorff, How are new citation-based journal indicators adding to the bibliometric toolbox?, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, vol.59, issue.1, pp.1327-1336, 2009.
DOI : 10.1002/asi.21024

S. Macdonald and J. Kam, Aardvark et al.: quality journals and gamesmanship in management studies, Journal of Information Science, vol.33, issue.6, pp.702-717, 2007.
DOI : 10.1177/0165551507077419

G. Maier, Impact factors and peer judgment: The case of regional science journals, Scientometrics, vol.69, issue.3, pp.651-667, 2006.
DOI : 10.1007/s11192-006-0175-0

M. Magri and A. Solari, The SCI Journal Citation Reports: A potential tool for studying journals?, Scientometrics, vol.33, issue.No. 22, pp.93-117, 1996.
DOI : 10.1007/BF02018235

B. R. Martin and J. Irvine, Assessing basic research, Research Policy, vol.12, issue.2, pp.61-90, 1983.
DOI : 10.1016/0048-7333(83)90005-7

H. F. Moed, The future of research evaluation rests with an intelligent combination of advanced metrics and transparent peer review, Science and Public Policy, vol.34, issue.8, pp.575-583, 2007.
DOI : 10.3152/030234207X255179

H. F. Moed, M. Luwel, and A. J. Nederhof, Towards Research Performance in the Humanities, Library Trends, vol.50, issue.3, pp.498-520, 2002.

H. F. Moed and T. N. Van-leeuwen, Impact factors can mislead, Nature, vol.381, issue.6579, p.381186, 1996.
DOI : 10.1038/381186a0

S. Moussa and M. Touzani, Ranking marketing journals using the Google Scholar-based hg-index, Journal of Informetrics, vol.4, issue.1, pp.107-117, 2010.
DOI : 10.1016/j.joi.2009.10.001

A. J. Nederhof, Bibliometric monitoring of research performance in the Social Sciences and the Humanities: A Review, Scientometrics, vol.66, issue.1, pp.81-100, 2006.
DOI : 10.1007/s11192-006-0007-2

T. Nisonger, The Relationship Between International Editorial Board Composition and Citation Measures in Political Science, Business, and Genetics Journals, Scientometrics, vol.54, issue.2, pp.257-268, 2002.
DOI : 10.1023/A:1016065929026

M. Norris and C. Oppenheim, Comparing alternatives to the Web of Science for coverage of the social sciences??? literature, Journal of Informetrics, vol.1, issue.2, pp.161-169, 2007.
DOI : 10.1016/j.joi.2006.12.001

J. Pons-novell and D. Tirado-fabregat, Is there life beyond the ISI Journal lists? The international impact of Spanish, Italian, French and German economics journals, Applied Economics, vol.12, issue.6, pp.42-689, 2010.
DOI : 10.1016/j.euroecorev.2004.09.011
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00582057

D. Pontille and D. M. Torny, Revues qui comptent, revues qu'on compte : produire des classements en économie et gestion, 1997.

P. O. Seglen, Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research, BMJ, vol.314, issue.7079, pp.314-498, 1997.
DOI : 10.1136/bmj.314.7079.497

G. Singh, K. M. Haddad, and C. W. Chow, Are Articles in "Top" Management Journals Necessarily of Higher Quality?, Journal of Management Inquiry, vol.16, issue.4, pp.319-331, 2007.
DOI : 10.1177/1056492607305894

A. Solari and M. Magri, A new approach to the SCI journal citation reports, a system for evaluating scientific journals, Scientometrics, issue.3, pp.47-605, 2000.

W. H. Starbuck, How Much Better Are the Most-Prestigious Journals? The Statistics of Academic Publication, Organization Science, vol.16, issue.2, pp.180-200, 2005.
DOI : 10.1287/orsc.1040.0107

D. J. Svantesson, International ranking of law journals - can it be done and at what cost?, Legal Studies, vol.29, issue.4, pp.678-691, 2009.
DOI : 10.1111/j.1748-121X.2009.00127.x

G. Svensson, The paradoxnoia of top journal(s) in marketing, European Journal of Marketing, vol.40, issue.11/12, pp.1153-1168, 2006.
DOI : 10.1108/03090560610702740

P. Thomas and D. Watkins, Institutional research rankings via bibliometric analysis and direct peer review: A comparative case study with policy implications, Scientometrics, vol.2, issue.1, pp.41-335, 1998.
DOI : 10.1007/BF02459050

R. Van-noorden, Metrics: A profusion of measures, Nature, vol.435, issue.7300, pp.864-866, 2010.
DOI : 10.1371/journal.pone.0006022

H. D. White, S. K. Boell, H. Yu, M. Davis, C. Wilson et al., Libcitations: A measure for comparative assessment of book publications in the humanities and social sciences, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, vol.38, issue.2, pp.60-1083, 2009.
DOI : 10.1002/asi.21045

A. B. Wagner, Percentile-Based Journal Impact Factors: A Neglected Collection Development Metric. Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship The Citation Culture, 1999.

H. A. Zuckerman and R. K. Merton, Patterns of evaluation in science: Institutionalisation, structure and functions of the referee system, Minerva, vol.9, issue.1, pp.66-100, 1971.
DOI : 10.1007/BF01553188