R. Agarwala, China: Reforming Intergovernmental Fiscal Relations, 1992.

J. Akin, P. Hutchinson, and K. Strumpf, Decentralisation and government provision of public goods: The public health sector in Uganda, Journal of Development Studies, vol.16, issue.8, pp.41-1417, 2005.
DOI : 10.1596/978-0-1952-1114-6

L. Anselin, A. K. Bera, R. Florax, and M. J. Yoon, Simple diagnostic tests for spatial dependence, Regional Science and Urban Economics, vol.26, issue.1, pp.77-104, 1996.
DOI : 10.1016/0166-0462(95)02111-6

L. Anselin, J. L. Gallo, and H. Jayet, Spatial econometrics and panel data models Handbook of panel data econometrics, 2006.

M. Arellano and S. Bond, Some Tests of Specification for Panel Data: Monte Carlo Evidence and an Application to Employment Equations, The Review of Economic Studies, vol.58, issue.2, pp.277-97, 1991.
DOI : 10.2307/2297968

M. Arellano and O. Bover, Another look at the instrumental variable estimation of error-components models, Journal of Econometrics, vol.68, issue.1, pp.29-51, 1995.
DOI : 10.1016/0304-4076(94)01642-D

G. G. Arikan, Fiscal Decentralization: A Remedy for Corruption?, International Tax and Public Finance, vol.11, issue.2, pp.175-195, 2004.
DOI : 10.1023/B:ITAX.0000011399.00053.a1

J. Arze, J. Martinez-vasquez, and R. Puwanti, Local Government Fiscal Competition in Developing Countries: The Case of Indonesia, Urban Public Economics Review, pp.13-45, 2008.

J. Ashworth and B. Heyndels, Politicians' preferences on local tax rates: An empirical analysis, European Journal of Political Economy, vol.13, issue.3, pp.479-502, 1997.
DOI : 10.1016/S0176-2680(97)00015-3

R. Bahl, iscal Policy in China, Taxation and Intergovernmental Fiscal Relations, p.236, 1990.

P. Bardhan, Decentralization of Governance and Development, Journal of Economic Perspectives, vol.16, issue.4, pp.185-205, 2002.
DOI : 10.1257/089533002320951037

M. Barenstein and L. De-mello, Fiscal Decentralization and Governance: A Cross-Country Analysis, IMF Working Papers 01, 2001.

P. Belleflamme and J. Hindriks, Yardstick competition and political agency problems, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE), 2002.
DOI : 10.2139/ssrn.287885

URL : http://www.econ.qmul.ac.uk/papers/doc/wp441.pdf

T. Besley and A. Case, Does Electoral Accountability Affect Economic Policy Choices? Evidence from Gubernatorial Term Limits, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol.110, issue.3, pp.769-98, 1995.
DOI : 10.2307/2946699

T. J. Besley and M. Smart, Does Tax Competition Raise Voter Welfare?, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers, 2002.

O. Blanchard and A. Shleifer, Federalism With And Without Political Centralization. China Versus Russia, SSRN Electronic Journal, vol.7616, 2000.
DOI : 10.2139/ssrn.236127

URL : http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.25.3781

R. Blundell and S. Bond, Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models, Journal of Econometrics, vol.87, issue.1, pp.115-143, 1998.
DOI : 10.1016/S0304-4076(98)00009-8

R. Blundell, S. Bond, and F. Windmeijer, Estimation in dynamic panel data models: Improving on the performance of the standard GMM estimator, IFS Working Papers W00, 2000.
DOI : 10.1016/S0731-9053(00)15003-0

M. Bordignon, F. Cerniglia, and F. Revelli, In search of yardstick competition: a spatial analysis of Italian municipality property tax setting, Journal of Urban Economics, vol.54, issue.2, pp.199-217, 2003.
DOI : 10.1016/S0094-1190(03)00062-7

L. Brandt and M. Turner, The Usefulness of Corruptible Elections Working Papers tecipa-233, 2006.

C. Brett and J. Pinkse, The determinants of municipal tax rates in British Columbia, UBC Departmental Archives 98-03, 1998.
DOI : 10.1111/0008-4085.00037

M. Brülhart and M. Jametti, Does Tax Competition Tame the Leviathan?, CEPR Discussion Papers C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers, vol.6512, 2007.

J. K. Brueckner, Testing for Strategic Interaction Among Local Governments: The Case of Growth Controls, Journal of Urban Economics, vol.44, issue.3, pp.438-467, 1998.
DOI : 10.1006/juec.1997.2078

J. K. Brueckner and L. A. Saavedra, Do Local Governments Engage in Strategic Property-Tax Competition?, National Tax Journal, vol.54, issue.2, 2000.
DOI : 10.17310/ntj.2001.2.02

T. Buettner, Local business taxation and competition for capital: the choice of the tax rate, Regional Science and Urban Economics, vol.31, issue.2-3, pp.215-245, 2001.
DOI : 10.1016/S0166-0462(00)00041-7

J. I. Bulow, J. D. Geanakoplos, and P. D. Klemperer, Multimarket Oligopoly: Strategic Substitutes and Complements, Journal of Political Economy, vol.93, issue.3, pp.488-511, 1985.
DOI : 10.1086/261312

URL : http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.541.2368

H. H. Kelejian and I. R. Prucha, A Generalized Spatial Two-Stage Least Squares Procedure for Estimating a Spatial Autoregressive Model with Autoregressive Disturbances, The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, vol.17, issue.1, pp.99-121, 1998.
DOI : 10.1023/A:1007707430416

E. P. Lazear and S. Rosen, Rank-Order Tournaments as Optimum Labor Contracts, Journal of Political Economy, vol.89, issue.5, pp.841-64, 1981.
DOI : 10.1086/261010

H. Li and L. Zhou, Political turnover and economic performance: the incentive role of personnel control in China, Journal of Public Economics, vol.89, issue.9-10, pp.9-10, 2005.
DOI : 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2004.06.009

B. Lockwood and G. Migali, Did The Single Market Cause Competition in Excise Taxes? Evidence From EU Countries, The Economic Journal, vol.30, issue.4, pp.406-429, 2009.
DOI : 10.1111/j.1468-0297.2008.02235.x

C. F. Manski, Identification of Endogenous Social Effects: The Reflection Problem, The Review of Economic Studies, vol.60, issue.3, pp.531-573, 1993.
DOI : 10.2307/2298123

E. Maskin, Y. Qian, and C. Xu, Incentives, Scale Economies, and Organizational Form -(Now published in Economics of Transition (2201)), " STICERD -Theoretical Economics Paper Series 331, 1997.

S. J. Nickell, Biases in Dynamic Models with Fixed Effects, Econometrica, vol.49, issue.6, pp.1417-1443, 1981.
DOI : 10.2307/1911408

Y. Qian, How Reform Worked in China, Search of Prosperity: Analytical Narratives on Economic Growth, pp.297-333, 2003.
DOI : 10.2139/ssrn.317460

Y. Qian and B. R. Weingast, Federalism as a Commitment to Preserving Market Incentives, Journal of Economic Perspectives, vol.11, issue.4, pp.83-92, 1997.
DOI : 10.1257/jep.11.4.83

M. Redoano, Fiscal Interactions Among European Countries. Does the EU Matter?, CESifo Working Paper Series CESifo Working Paper No., CESifo GmbH, 2007.

F. Revelli, Performance rating and yardstick competition in social service provision, Journal of Public Economics, vol.90, issue.3, pp.459-475, 2006.
DOI : 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2005.07.006

J. Rincke, Yardstick Competition and Policy Innovation, SSRN Electronic Journal, 2005.
DOI : 10.2139/ssrn.711045

URL : http://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/24104/1/dp0511.pdf

A. Rodríguez-pose and A. Krøijer, Fiscal decentralization and economic growth in Central and Eastern Europe Working Papers, 2008.

D. Rodrik, Why do More Open Economies Have Bigger Governments?, Journal of Political Economy, vol.106, issue.5, pp.997-1032, 1998.
DOI : 10.1086/250038

D. Roodman, A Note on the Theme of Too Many Instruments, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, vol.16, issue.1, pp.135-158, 2009.
DOI : 10.1111/j.1468-0084.2008.00542.x

L. A. Saavedra, A Model of Welfare Competition with Evidence from AFDC, Journal of Urban Economics, vol.47, issue.2, pp.248-279, 2000.
DOI : 10.1006/juec.1999.2141

P. Salmon, DECENTRALISATION AS AN INCENTIVE SCHEME, Oxford Review of Economic Policy, vol.3, issue.2, pp.24-43, 1987.
DOI : 10.1093/oxrep/3.2.24

C. A. Schaltegger and D. Kuttel, Exit, Voice, and Mimicking Behavior: Evidence from Swiss Cantons, Public Choice, vol.113, issue.1/2, pp.1-23, 2002.
DOI : 10.1023/A:1020377207035

A. Shleifer, A Theory of Yardstick Competition, The RAND Journal of Economics, vol.16, issue.3, pp.319-327, 1985.
DOI : 10.2307/2555560

D. Treisman, The causes of corruption: a cross-national study, Journal of Public Economics, vol.76, issue.3, pp.399-457, 2000.
DOI : 10.1016/S0047-2727(99)00092-4

K. Tsui, Local tax system, intergovernmental transfers and China's local fiscal disparities, Journal of Comparative Economics, vol.33, issue.1, pp.173-196, 2005.
DOI : 10.1016/j.jce.2004.11.003

L. Veiga and F. Veiga, Political business cycles at the municipal level, Public Choice, vol.118, issue.3???4, pp.45-64, 2007.
DOI : 10.1007/s11127-006-9104-2

L. Zhang, Chinese Central-provincial Fiscal Relationships, Budgetary Decline and the Impact of the 1994 Fiscal Reform: An Evaluation, The China Quarterly, vol.157, issue.2, pp.115-141, 1999.
DOI : 10.1017/S0305741000040224

X. Zhang, Fiscal decentralization and political centralization in China: Implications for growth and inequality, Journal of Comparative Economics, vol.34, issue.4, pp.713-726, 2006.
DOI : 10.1016/j.jce.2006.08.006

E. V. Zhuravskaya, Incentives to provide local public goods: fiscal federalism, Russian style, Journal of Public Economics, vol.76, issue.3, pp.337-368, 2000.
DOI : 10.1016/S0047-2727(99)00090-0

G. St and . Tio-n, We a d o p t th e a ssu m p tio n o f w e a k e x o g e n e ity o f G D P g row th ra te , tra d e o p e n n e ss, fo re ig n d ire c t inve stm e nt in ?ow a n d c e ntra l g ove rn m e nt tra n sfe rs a n d th e a ssu m p tio n o f stric t e x o g e n e ity o f p o p u la tio n d e n sity, tre n d a n d u rb a n iz a tio n ra te . T h e w e ig hte d ave ra g e ve c to r o f p e r c a p ita p u b lic sp e n d in g in o th e r p rov in c e s is a lso in stru m e nte d by th e w e ig hte d ave ra g e o f n e ig hb o rs' c o ntro l va ria b le s. We c o lla p se in stru m e nts a n d lim it its nu m b e r

G. St and . Tio-n, We a d o p t th e a ssu m p tio n o f w e a k e x o g e n e ity o f G D P g row th ra te , tra d e o p e n n e ss, fo re ig n d ire c t inve stm e nt in ?ow a n d c e ntra l g ove rn m e nt tra n sfe rs a n d th e a ssu m p tio n o f stric t e x o g e n e ity o f p o p u la tio n d e n sity, tre n d a n d u rb a n iz a tio n ra te . T h e w e ig hte d ave ra g e ve c to r o f p e r c a p ita p u b lic sp e n d in g in o th e r p rov in c e s is a lso in stru m e nte d by th e w e ig hte d ave ra g e o f n e ig hb o rs' c o ntro l va ria b le s. We c o lla p se in stru m e nts a n d lim it its nu m b e r