Distance to Frontier, Selection, and Economic Growth, Journal of the European Economic Association, vol.4, issue.1, pp.37-74, 2006. ,
DOI : 10.1162/jeea.2006.4.1.37
URL : http://dspace.mit.edu/bitstream/1721.1/63472/1/distancetofronti00acem.pdf
Education, market rigidities and growth, Economics Letters, vol.102, issue.1, pp.62-65, 2009. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.econlet.2008.11.025
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00640855
Competition and Innovation: An Inverted U Relationship, Quarterly Journal of Economics, pp.701-728, 2005. ,
DOI : 10.1093/qje/120.2.701
URL : http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.153.2077
The Effects of Entry on Incumbent Innovation and Productivity, 2006. ,
Entry and Productivity Growth: Evidence from Microlevel Panel Data, Journal of the European Economic Association, vol.2, issue.2-3, pp.265-276, 2004. ,
DOI : 10.1162/154247604323067970
URL : http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:4481510
The Unequal Effects of Liberalization: Evidence from Dismantling the License Raj in India, 2006. ,
Competition and Growth, 2005. ,
Competition and growth with step-by-step innovation: An example, Papers and Proceedings, pp.771-782, 1997. ,
DOI : 10.1016/S0014-2921(97)00036-6
Competition, Imitation and Growth with Step-by-Step Innovation, Review of Economic Studies, vol.68, issue.3, pp.467-492, 2001. ,
DOI : 10.1111/1467-937X.00177
A Model of Growth Through Creative Destruction, Econometrica, vol.60, issue.2, pp.323-351, 1992. ,
DOI : 10.2307/2951599
Endogeneous Growth Theory, 1998. ,
Appropriate Growth Policy: A Unifying Framework, Journal of the European Economic Association, vol.4, issue.2-3, pp.269-314, 2006. ,
DOI : 10.1162/jeea.2006.4.2-3.269
On the Welfare Effects and Political Economy of Competition-Enhancing Policies, Economic Journal, vol.114, pp.804-834, 2004. ,
Regulation and Investment, Journal of the European Economic Association, vol.3, issue.4, pp.791-825, 2005. ,
DOI : 10.1162/1542476054430834
Antitrust Policy and National Growth: Some Evidence from Italy, Giornale degli Economisti e Annali di Economia, vol.63, issue.1, pp.69-86, 2004. ,
Does services liberalization benefit manufacturing firms?, Journal of International Economics, vol.85, issue.1, 2006. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.jinteco.2011.05.002
URL : http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.604.9832
Competition, R&D, and the Cost of Innovation, SSRN Electronic Journal, 2008. ,
DOI : 10.2139/ssrn.1680311
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00586690
Service Regulation and Growth: Evidence from OECD Countries, SSRN Electronic Journal, vol.675, 2008. ,
DOI : 10.2139/ssrn.1160183
Plans and Productivity in International Trade, American Economic Review, issue.04, pp.93-1268, 2003. ,
Market Share, Market Value and Innovation in a Panel of British Manufacturing Firms, Review of Economic Studies, vol.66, issue.3, pp.529-554, 1999. ,
DOI : 10.1111/1467-937X.00097
Financial Factors and Investment in Belgium, France, Germany, and the United Kingdom: A Comparison Using Company Panel Data, Review of Economics and Statistics, vol.63, issue.1, pp.153-165, 2003. ,
DOI : 10.2307/2328946
Competition, SSRN Electronic Journal, 2000. ,
DOI : 10.2139/ssrn.249144
Competitive Pressure: The Effects on Investments in Product and Process Innovation, The RAND Journal of Economics, vol.31, issue.3, pp.549-569, 2000. ,
DOI : 10.2307/2601000
A comparison of structural productivity in the major industrialized countries, OECD Economics Studies, N° 41, pp.75-107, 2005. ,
Trends in ???structural??? productivity levels in the major industrialized countries, Economics Letters, vol.95, issue.1, pp.151-156, 2007. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.econlet.2006.09.027
Competition Policy and Productivity Growth: An Empirical Assessment, 2009. ,
DOI : 10.1162/rest_a_00304
URL : http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.641.7792
Product Market Regulation in the Non-Manufacturing Sectors of OECD Countries: Measurement and Highlights, 2006. ,
DOI : 10.1787/362886816127
Regulation and Productivity Performance, Oxford Review of Economic Policy, vol.22, issue.2, pp.186-202, 2006. ,
DOI : 10.1093/oxrep/grj012
URL : http://oxrep.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/22/2/186
Measuring competition in the Netherlands, A comparison of indicators over the period, p.163, 1993. ,
Regulation of financial systems and economic growth in OECD countries, OECD Economic Studies, vol.2006, issue.2, pp.77-113, 2006. ,
DOI : 10.1787/eco_studies-v2006-art10-en
Restructuring and productivity growth in uk manufacturing*, The Economic Journal, vol.2, issue.6, 2000. ,
DOI : 10.1006/jeth.1997.2358
Contrasting Europe's Decline: Do Product Market Reforms Help?, Structural Reforms Without Prejudices, 2006. ,
Competition in the Service Sector and the Performances of Manufacturing Firms: Does Liberalization Matter?, CESifo Working Paper series, p.2942, 2010. ,
What do we know about entry?, International Journal of Industrial Organization, vol.13, issue.4, pp.421-440, 1995. ,
DOI : 10.1016/0167-7187(95)00498-X
Market Structure, Corporate Performance and Innovative Activity, 1995. ,
The value of innovation: The interaction of competition, R&D and IP, Research Policy, vol.35, issue.4, pp.562-580, 2006. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.respol.2006.02.002
The Link Between Product Market Reform and Macro- Economic Performance, Economic Paper No, vol.209, 2004. ,
Product Market Reform and Innovation in the EU*, Scandinavian Journal of Economics, vol.65, issue.2, 2006. ,
DOI : 10.1111/j.1467-9442.2010.01602.x
Mapping the Two Faces of R&D: Productivity Growth in a Panel of OECD Industries, Review of Economics and Statistics, vol.56, issue.6, pp.883-895, 2004. ,
DOI : 10.1086/261725
Productivity Convergence and Foreign Ownership at the Establishment level, 2002. ,
Quality Ladders in the Theory of Growth, Review of Economic Studies, vol.58, issue.1, pp.43-61, 1991. ,
DOI : 10.3386/w3099
Does Inward Foreign Direct Investment Boost the Productivity of Domestic Firms?, Review of Economics and Statistics, vol.47, issue.4, pp.482-496, 2007. ,
DOI : 10.2307/2171753
Typologies of linear dynamic systems and models, Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, vol.49, issue.2, pp.177-201, 1996. ,
DOI : 10.1016/0378-3758(95)00036-4
Market services productivity across Europe and the US, Economic Policy, vol.23, issue.53, pp.139-194, 2008. ,
DOI : 10.1111/j.1468-0327.2007.00194.x
The Impact of Trade on Intra-Industry Reallocations and Aggregate Industry Productivity, Econometrica, vol.71, issue.6, pp.1695-1725, 2003. ,
DOI : 10.1111/1468-0262.00467
Competition and Corporate Performance, Journal of Political Economy, vol.104, issue.4, pp.724-746, 1996. ,
DOI : 10.1086/262040
What makes firms perform well?, European Economic Review, vol.41, issue.3-5, p.41, 1997. ,
DOI : 10.1016/S0014-2921(97)00037-8
URL : http://cver.lse.ac.uk/textonly/cver/pubs/cverdp003.pdf
Subjective and objective measures of governmental regulations in OECD nations, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, vol.59, issue.3, pp.433-449, 2006. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.jebo.2004.05.003
Regulation and Economic Performance: Product Market Reforms and Productivity in the OECD, Institutions, Development, and Economic Growth, 2006. ,
DOI : 10.1787/726517007575
Barriers to Technology Adoption and Development, Journal of Political Economy, vol.102, issue.2, pp.298-321, 1994. ,
DOI : 10.1086/261933
Monopoly Rights: A Barrier to Riches, American Economic Review, vol.89, issue.5, pp.1216-1233, 1999. ,
DOI : 10.1257/aer.89.5.1216
Policy Distortions and Aggregate Productivity with Heterogeneous Plants, National Bureau of Economic Research, p.13018, 2007. ,
DOI : 10.3386/w13018
Endogenous Technological Change, Journal of Political Economy, vol.98, issue.5, Part 2, pp.71-73, 1990. ,
DOI : 10.1086/261725
Product Market Regulation and Macroeconomic Performance: A Review of Cross Country Evidence, IZA Discussion Papers, p.1791, 2005. ,
DOI : 10.1596/1813-9450-3770
Cross-country Conversion Factors for Sectoral Productivity Comparisons, 2004. ,
DOI : 10.3386/w10279
Effect of gap on the regulation impact] Fixed effects : Time * Country Yes Yes Industry Yes Yes Tests of joint significance, ] Gap in M FP levels t-1 0.037*** 0.041*** 0.065*** 0.032***, pp.1-1 ,
FP above which REG -1 has a positive impact Ratio 2.123*** 1.425*** 4.115* Proportion of the sample above this threshold 13, p.4629 ,