R. Altshuler and T. J. Goodspeed, Follow the leader? Evidence on European and U.S. tax competition, Departmental Working Papers, 2002.

R. Amir and A. Stepanova, Second-mover advantage and price leadership in Bertrand duopoly, Games and Economic Behavior, vol.55, issue.1, pp.1-20, 2006.
DOI : 10.1016/j.geb.2005.03.004

R. E. Baldwin and P. Krugman, Agglomeration, integration and tax harmonisation, European Economic Review, vol.48, issue.1, pp.1-23, 2004.
DOI : 10.1016/S0014-2921(02)00318-5

T. Bayindir-upmann and A. Ziad, Existence of equilibria in a basic tax-competition model, Regional Science and Urban Economics, vol.35, issue.1, pp.1-22, 2005.
DOI : 10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2003.01.001

URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00068854

S. Bucovetsky, Asymmetric tax competition, Journal of Urban Economics, vol.30, issue.2, pp.167-181, 1991.
DOI : 10.1016/0094-1190(91)90034-5

J. I. Bulow, J. D. Geanakoplos, and P. D. Klemperer, Multimarket Oligopoly: Strategic Substitutes and Complements, Journal of Political Economy, vol.93, issue.3, pp.93-488, 1985.
DOI : 10.1086/261312

URL : http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.541.2368

C. Aspremont, L. Gerard, and . Varet, Stackelberg-solvable games and pre-play communication, 201?217. 28 See footnote (3) on the issue of the existence of Nash equilibrium in tax competition models, 1980.

M. Devereux, M. Lockwood, and . Redoano, Do countries compete over corporate tax rates?, Journal of Public Economics, vol.92, issue.5-6, pp.5-6, 2008.
DOI : 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2007.09.005

URL : http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.11.5108

S. Dowrick, von Stackelberg and Cournot Duopoly: Choosing Roles, The RAND Journal of Economics, vol.17, issue.2, pp.251-260, 1986.
DOI : 10.2307/2555388

E. Gal-or, First Mover and Second Mover Advantages, International Economic Review, vol.26, issue.3, pp.649-653, 1985.
DOI : 10.2307/2526710

R. H. Gordon, Can Capital Income Taxes Survive in Open Economies?, The Journal of Finance, vol.80, issue.3, pp.1159-80, 1992.
DOI : 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1992.tb04009.x

L. Grazzini and T. Van-ypersele, Fiscal Coordination and Political Competition, Journal of Public Economic Theory, vol.5, issue.2, pp.305-325, 2003.
DOI : 10.1111/1467-9779.00134

J. H. Hamilton and S. M. Slutsky, Endogenous timing in duopoly games: Stackelberg or cournot equilibria, Games and Economic Behavior, vol.2, issue.1, pp.29-46, 1990.
DOI : 10.1016/0899-8256(90)90012-J

J. C. Harsanyi and R. Selten, A general theory of equilibrium selection in games, 1988.

J. Hindriks, S. Peralta, and S. Weber, Competing in taxes and investment under fiscal equalization, Journal of Public Economics, issue.12, pp.92-2392, 2008.

R. Kanbur and M. Keen, Jeux sans frontieres: tax competition and tax coordination when countries differ in size, American Economic Review, vol.83, issue.4, pp.877-92, 1993.

D. Laussel and M. L. Breton, Existence of Nash equilibria in fiscal competition models, Regional Science and Urban Economics, vol.28, issue.3, pp.283-296, 1998.
DOI : 10.1016/S0166-0462(97)00029-X

S. Peralta and T. Van-ypersele, Factor endowments and welfare levels in an asymmetric tax competition game, Journal of Urban Economics, vol.57, issue.2, pp.258-274, 2005.
DOI : 10.1016/j.jue.2004.10.007

J. D. Petchey and P. Shapiro, Equilibrium in fiscal competition games from the point of view of the dual, Regional Science and Urban Economics, vol.39, issue.1, pp.97-108, 2009.
DOI : 10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2008.05.015

P. Raimondos-møller and A. D. Woodland, Tariff strategies and small open economies, Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue Canadienne d`Economique, vol.33, issue.1, pp.25-40, 2000.
DOI : 10.1111/0008-4085.00002

M. Redoano, Fiscal interactions among European countries. Does the EU matter?, CESifo Working Paper Series CESifo Working Paper No., CESifo GmbH, 2007.

F. Revelli, On Spatial Public Finance Empirics, International Tax and Public Finance, vol.53, issue.4, pp.475-492, 2005.
DOI : 10.1007/s10797-005-4199-9

R. W. Rosenthal, A note on robustness of equilibria with respect to commitment opportunities, Games and Economic Behavior, vol.3, issue.2, pp.237-243, 1991.
DOI : 10.1016/0899-8256(91)90024-9

P. Rothstein, Discontinuous Payoffs, Shared Resources, and Games of Fiscal Competition: Existence of Pure Strategy Nash Equilibrium, Journal of Public Economic Theory, vol.11, issue.2, pp.335-368, 2007.
DOI : 10.1016/0094-1190(86)90048-3

T. Schelling, The strategy of conflict, 1960.

C. Syropoulos, Endogenous Timing in Games of Commercial Policy, The Canadian Journal of Economics, vol.27, issue.4, pp.847-64, 1994.
DOI : 10.2307/136187

E. Van-damme and S. Hurkens, Commitment robust equilibria and endogenous timing Endogenous Stackelberg leadership Endogenous price leadership, 290?311 105?129, p.47, 1996.

X. Vives, Olipoly pricing. Old ideas and new tools, 1999.

Y. Wang, Commodity Taxes Under Fiscal Competition: Stackelberg Equilibrium and Optimality, American Economic Review, vol.89, issue.4, pp.974-981, 1999.
DOI : 10.1257/aer.89.4.974

D. Wellisch, The theory of public finance in a federal state, 2000.
DOI : 10.1017/CBO9780511613319

D. E. Wildasin, Nash equilibria in models of fiscal competition Some rudimetary 'duopolity' theory, 229?240, pp.393-421, 1988.

J. D. Wilson, A theory of interregional tax competition Tax competition with interregional differences in factor endowments Theories of tax competition, 296?315 423?451, pp.269-304, 1986.

J. D. Wilson and D. E. Wildasin, Capital tax competition: bane or boon, Journal of Public Economics, vol.88, issue.6, pp.1065-1091, 2004.
DOI : 10.1016/S0047-2727(03)00057-4

G. R. Zodrow and P. Mieszkowski, Pigou, Tiebout, property taxation, and the underprovision of local public goods, Journal of Urban Economics, vol.19, issue.3, pp.356-370, 1986.
DOI : 10.1016/0094-1190(86)90048-3