. En-ce-qui-concerne-les-niveaux, En effet, les résultats plutôt mitigés en général, la plupart des études ne font pas ressortir de rejet ni d'adhésion inconditionnelle nette. De plus, la manière d'exposer l'information contribue à orienter les réponses des enquêtés (par exemple dans le cas d'un énoncé trop alarmiste) Or les éléments d'information fournis varient fortement d'une étude à l'autre, que ce soit sur la présentation des risques potentiels

S. Pour-conclure and . Dans, soulignent qu'il s'agit là de situations préconstruites qui n'ont pas de valeurs prédictives sur les réactions du public. «Il est important de ne pas oublier», écrivent-ils, que «les réactions futures du public seront issues d'un processus d'apprentissage différent, étendu sur une plus longue période de temps, et qu'elles seront probablement influencées par les discours des opposants et des défenseurs, du public au sens large sur la technologie de capture et de séquestration du CO 2 , Palmgren. et al, 2004.

T. Curry, Public Awareness of Carbon Capture and Storage: a Survey of Attitudes toward Climate Change Mitigation, 2004.

T. Curry, S. Ansolabehere, and H. Herzog, A Survey of Public Attitudes towards Climate Change and Climate Change Mitigation Technologies in the United States, Publication No. LFEE 2007-001 WP, 2007.

T. Curry, D. Reiner, S. Ansolabehere, and H. Herzog, How aware is the public of carbon capture and storage?, th International Conference on Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies (GHGT-7), pp.5-9, 2004.
DOI : 10.1016/B978-008044704-9/50101-4

T. Curry, D. Reiner, M. De-figueiredo, and H. Herzog, A survey of public attitudes towards the Energy & Environment in Great Britain, Publication No. LFEE 2005-001 WP, 2005.

M. De-best-waldhober, D. Daamen, and A. Faaij, Informed Public Opinions on CO2-Capture and Storage Technologies, th International Conference on Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies (GHGT-8), 2006.

D. Figueiredo, M. Reiner, D. Herzog, and H. , Ocean Carbon Sequestration: a case study in Public and Institutional Perceptions, th International Conference on Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies, 2002.

C. Gough, I. Taylor, and S. Shackley, Burying carbon under the sea: an initial exploration of public opinions, Working Paper 10, 2001.

N. Huijs, Public perceptions of carbon dioxide storage, the role of trust and affect in attitude formation, 2003.

N. Huijs, Social acceptance of carbon dioxide storage, Energy Policy, vol.35, issue.5, pp.2780-2789, 2007.
DOI : 10.1016/j.enpol.2006.12.007

C. Palmgren, traduction de l'auteur. « ? it is important to remember that future public reactions will result from a very different learning process, spread out over a much longer periode of time, and probably dominated by messages from advocates and opponents. Thus, the public's decision context will be rather different from the ones we have created in our studies, 2004.

K. Itaoka, A. Saito, and M. Akai, Public acceptance of CO2 capture and storage technology: a survey of public opinion to explore influential factors, th International Conference on Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies (GHGT-7), pp.5-9, 2004.

K. Itaoka, A. Saito, and M. Akai, A path analysis for public survey data on social acceptance of CO2 capture and storage technology, th International Conference on Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies (GHGT-8), 2006.

E. Miller, L. Bell, and L. Buys, Public Understanding of Carbon Sequestration in Australia: Socio-Demographic Predictors of Knowledge, Engagement and Trust, Australian Journal of Emerging Technologies and Society, vol.5, issue.1, pp.15-33, 2007.

C. Palmgren, G. Morgan, W. De-bruin, and D. Keith, Initial Public Perceptions of Deep Geological and Oceanic Disposal of Carbon Dioxide, Environmental Science & Technology, vol.38, issue.24, pp.6441-6450, 2004.
DOI : 10.1021/es040400c

. Reiner-ea, N. Trondheim, S. Shackley, C. Mclachlan, and C. Gough, An international comparison of public attitudes towards carbon capture and storage technologies The Public Perceptions of Carbon Capture and Storage, Working Paper 44, th International Conference on Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies, 2004.

J. Sharp, M. Jaccard, and D. Keith, Public attitudes toward geological disposal of carbon dioxide in Canada, th International Conference on Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies (GHGT- 8), 2006.

J. Sharp, Public attitudes toward geological disposal of carbon dioxide in Canada, 2005.

K. Tokushige, K. Akimoto, and T. Tomoda, Public acceptance and risk-benefit perception of CO2 geological storage for global warming mitigation in Japan, Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change 12, pp.1237-1251, 2006.

K. Tokushige, K. Akimoto, and T. Tomoda, Public Perceptions on the acceptance of CO2 geological storage and the valuable information for the acceptance, th International Conference on Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies (GHGT-8), jun, 2006.

M. Uno, Y. Mori, K. Tokushige, and A. Furukawa, Exploration of public acceptance regarding CO2 underground sequestration technologies Social Acceptance of Carbon Dioxide Sequestration in The Netherlands Social acceptance of renewable energy innovation: an introduction to the concept, Proceedings of the 7 th International Conference on Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies (GHGT-7) th International Conference on Greenhouse gas control technologies (GHGT-8), pp.5-9, 2004.