Neanderthal acculturation in Western Europe? A critical review of the evidence and its interpretation
Francesco d'Errico
(1)
,
João Zilhão
(2)
,
Michèle Julien
(3)
,
Dominique Baffier
(4)
,
Jacques Pelegrin
(4)
Francesco d'Errico
- Fonction : Auteur
- PersonId : 738812
- IdHAL : francesco-derrico
- ORCID : 0000-0002-2422-3079
- IdRef : 033791899
Jacques Pelegrin
- Fonction : Auteur
- PersonId : 180835
- IdHAL : jacques-pelegrin
- ORCID : 0000-0002-0671-128X
- IdRef : 034765360
Résumé
The presence of bone tools, personal ornaments, and apparently "modern" stone tools in European late Middle Paleolithic or pre- Aurignacian Paleolithic contexts is generally interpreted as the result of the acculturation of final Neanderthal populations by anatomically modern humans. Analysis of the stratigraphic, chronological, and archaeological data from the key site of Grotte du Renne (Arcy-sur-Cure, France) shows that the notion of acculturation, as commonly understood, is inconsistent with the evidence. It is argued here that this site is not an exceptional case and is best explained by models of independent development that are supported by a reevaluation of Châtelperronian technology and by the patterns of chronological and geographical distribution of Aurignacian, Châtelperronian, Uluzzian, and late Mousterian settlements.
Domaines
Archéologie et PréhistoireFormat du dépôt | Notice |
---|---|
Type de dépôt | Article dans une revue |
Titre |
en
Neanderthal acculturation in Western Europe? A critical review of the evidence and its interpretation
|
Résumé |
en
The presence of bone tools, personal ornaments, and apparently "modern" stone tools in European late Middle Paleolithic or pre- Aurignacian Paleolithic contexts is generally interpreted as the result of the acculturation of final Neanderthal populations by anatomically modern humans. Analysis of the stratigraphic, chronological, and archaeological data from the key site of Grotte du Renne (Arcy-sur-Cure, France) shows that the notion of acculturation, as commonly understood, is inconsistent with the evidence. It is argued here that this site is not an exceptional case and is best explained by models of independent development that are supported by a reevaluation of Châtelperronian technology and by the patterns of chronological and geographical distribution of Aurignacian, Châtelperronian, Uluzzian, and late Mousterian settlements.
|
Auteur(s) |
Francesco d'Errico
1
, João Zilhão
2
, Michèle Julien
3
, Dominique Baffier
4
, Jacques Pelegrin
4
1
PACEA -
De la Préhistoire à l'Actuel : Culture, Environnement et Anthropologie
( 205557 )
- Université de Bordeaux - Bâtiment B8 - CS50023 - Allée Geoffroy-Saint-Hilaire - 33615 Pessac Cedex
- France
2
Department of Archaeology and Anthropology
( 102754 )
- University of Bristol, 43 Woodland Road, Bristol BS8 1UU, United Kingdom
- France
3
ArScAn -
Archéologies et Sciences de l'Antiquité
( 1003 )
- MSH Mondes (bâtiment René-Ginouvès). 21, allée de l’Université 92023 NANTERRE Cedex
- France
4
PréTech -
Préhistoire et Technologie
( 1014 )
- Maison René Ginouvès
21 allée de l'université
93023 NANTERRE cedex
- France
|
Comité de lecture |
Oui
|
Vulgarisation |
Non
|
Langue du document |
Anglais
|
Nom de la revue |
|
Audience |
Internationale
|
Date de publication |
1998
|
Volume |
39
|
Page/Identifiant |
1-44
|
Domaine(s) |
|
Mots-clés |
en
Middle-to-Upper-Paleolithic transition, Neanderthal, anatomically modern humans, cultural interactions, Europe
|
DOI | 10.1086/204689 |
Loading...