I. Ajzen, T. C. Brown, and F. Carvajal, Explaining the Discrepancy between Intentions and Actions: The Case of Hypothetical Bias in Contingent Valuation, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, vol.30, issue.9, pp.1108-1120, 2004.
DOI : 10.1177/0146167204264079

J. Brehm, A theory of psychological reactance, 1966.

A. Burton, K. Carson, S. Chilton, and W. Hutchinson, Resolving questions about bias in real and hypothetical referenda, Environmental and Resource Economics, vol.45, issue.4, pp.513-525, 2007.
DOI : 10.1007/s10640-007-9095-6

T. Cherry, P. Frykblom, J. Shogren, J. List, and M. Sullivan, Laboratory Testbeds and Non-Market Valuation: The Case of Bidding Behavior in a Second-Price Auction with an Outside Option, Environmental and Resource Economics, vol.84, issue.3, pp.29-285, 2004.
DOI : 10.1007/s10640-004-5264-z

T. L. Cherry, P. Frykblom, and J. F. Shogren, Hardnose the Dictator, American Economic Review, vol.92, issue.4, pp.1218-1221, 2002.
DOI : 10.1257/00028280260344740

J. P. Collins and C. A. Vossler, Incentive compatibility tests of choice experiment value elicitation questions, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, vol.58, issue.2, 2009.
DOI : 10.1016/j.jeem.2009.04.004

R. Cummings, D. Brookshire, and W. Schulze, Valuing Environmental Goods: An Assessment of the Contingent Valuation Method, 1986.

R. G. Cummings, S. Elliott, G. W. Harrison, and J. Murphy, Are Hypothetical Referenda Incentive Compatible?, Journal of Political Economy, vol.105, issue.3, pp.609-621, 1997.
DOI : 10.1086/262084

R. G. Cummings and L. O. Taylor, Unbiased Value Estimates for Environmental Goods: A Cheap Talk Design for the Contingent Valuation Method, American Economic Review, vol.89, issue.3, pp.649-665, 1999.
DOI : 10.1257/aer.89.3.649

R. Davidson and J. G. Mackinnon, Bootstrap methods in econometrics, Palgrave Handbooks of Econometrics, pp.812-838, 2006.

M. Ehmke, J. L. Lusk, and J. List, Is Hypothetical Bias a Universal Phenomenon? A Multinational Investigation, Land Economics, vol.84, issue.3, pp.489-500, 2008.
DOI : 10.3368/le.84.3.489

B. Greiner, An Online Recruitment System for Economic Experiments., " in Forschung und wissenschaftliches Rechnen, GWDG Bericht, vol.63, pp.79-93, 2003.

R. Guzman and C. Kolstad, Researching Preferences, Valuation and Hypothetical Bias, Environmental and Resource Economics, vol.73, issue.5, pp.465-487, 2007.
DOI : 10.1007/s10640-006-9034-y

G. Harrison, Experimental Evidence on Alternative Environmental Valuation Methods, Environmental and Resource Economics, vol.50, issue.5, pp.125-162, 2006.
DOI : 10.1007/s10640-005-3792-9

G. W. Harrison, R. M. Harstad, and E. E. Rutström, Experimental Methods and Elicitation of Values, Experimental Economics, vol.7, issue.2, pp.123-140, 2004.
DOI : 10.1023/B:EXEC.0000026975.48587.f0

G. W. Harrison and E. E. Rutström, Chapter 81 Experimental Evidence on the Existence of Hypothetical Bias in Value Elicitation Methods, Handbook of Experimental Economics Results, pp.81-752, 2008.
DOI : 10.1016/S1574-0722(07)00081-9

N. Jacquemet, R. Joule, S. Luchini, and J. Shogren, Earned wealth, engaged bidders? Evidence from a second-price auction, Economics Letters, vol.105, issue.1, pp.36-38, 2009.
DOI : 10.1016/j.econlet.2009.05.010
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00429894

J. Kagel, 9. Auctions A Survey of Experimental Research, Handbook of Experimental Economics, pp.501-585, 1995.
DOI : 10.1515/9781400883172-010

J. Laffont and D. Martimort, The Theory of Incentives: The Principal-Agent Model, 2002.

C. E. Landry and J. A. List, Using Ex Ante Approaches to Obtain Credible Signals for Value in Contingent Markets: Evidence from the Field, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, vol.89, issue.2, pp.420-429, 2007.
DOI : 10.1111/j.1467-8276.2007.01017.x

J. A. List and C. A. Gallet, What Experimental Protocol Influence Disparities Between Actual and Hypothetical Stated Values?, Environmental and Resource Economics, vol.20, issue.3, pp.241-254, 2001.
DOI : 10.1023/A:1012791822804

J. A. List and J. F. Shogren, Calibration of the difference between actual and hypothetical valuations in a field experiment, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, vol.37, issue.2, pp.193-205, 1998.
DOI : 10.1016/S0167-2681(98)00084-5

Y. Mitani and N. E. Flores, Demand Revelation, Hypothetical Bias, and Threshold Public Goods Provision Hypothetical Bias Reconsidered: Payment and Provision Uncertainties in a Threshold Provision Mechanism, Environmental and Resource Economics, Forthcoming, 2009.

J. J. Murphy, T. Stevens, and D. Weatherhead, Is Cheap Talk Effective at Eliminating Hypothetical Bias in a Provision Point Mechanism?, Environmental & Resource Economics, vol.27, issue.2, pp.327-343, 2005.
DOI : 10.1007/s10640-004-4224-y

J. J. Murphy and T. H. Stevens, Contingent Valuation, Hypothetical Bias, and Experimental Economics, Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, vol.21, issue.02, pp.182-192, 2004.
DOI : 10.1017/S1068280500005761

E. E. Rutström, Home-grown values and incentive compatible auction design, International Journal of Game Theory, vol.27, issue.3, pp.427-441, 1998.
DOI : 10.1007/s001820050082

F. Schläpfer, Contingent valuation: A new perspective, Ecological Economics, vol.64, issue.4, pp.729-740, 2008.
DOI : 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.10.010

J. F. Shogren, Experimental Methods and Valuation, " in Valuing Environmental Changes, pp.969-1027, 2005.

L. O. Taylor, M. Mckee, S. K. Laury, and R. G. Cummings, Induced-value tests of the referendum voting mechanism, Economics Letters, vol.71, issue.1, pp.61-65, 2001.
DOI : 10.1016/S0165-1765(00)00410-9

W. Vickrey, COUNTERSPECULATION, AUCTIONS, AND COMPETITIVE SEALED TENDERS, The Journal of Finance, vol.16, issue.1, pp.8-37, 1961.
DOI : 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1961.tb02789.x

C. A. Vossler and M. Mckee, Induced-Value Tests of Contingent Valuation Elicitation Mechanisms, Environmental and Resource Economics, vol.22, issue.3, pp.137-168, 2006.
DOI : 10.1007/s10640-006-9011-5

R. Zeiliger, A presentation of Regate, Internet based Software for Experimental Economics, 2000.