R. Bellman, Dynamic Programming, 1957.

T. L. Cherry, S. Kroll, and J. F. Shogren, The impact of endowment heterogeneity and origin on public good contributions: evidence from the lab, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, vol.57, issue.3, p.357365, 2005.
DOI : 10.1016/j.jebo.2003.11.010

J. Clark, Fairness in Public Good Provision: An Investigation of Preferences for Equality and Proportionality, The Canadian Journal of Economics, vol.31, issue.3, p.708729, 1998.
DOI : 10.2307/136209

S. Georganas, D. Levin, and P. Mcgee, Do Irrelevant Payos Aect Behavior When Dominant Strategy is Available: Experimental Evidence from Second-Price Auctions, 2009.

B. Greiner, An Online Recruitment System for Economic Experiments., in Forschung und wissenschaftliches Rechnen, Kremer, and V. Macho, p.7993, 2003.

G. Harrison, House money eects in public good experiments: Comment, Experimental Economics, vol.10, issue.4, p.429437, 2007.

N. Jacquemet, R. Joule, S. Luchini, and J. Shogren, Do French Students Really Bid Sincerely, 2008.

J. Kagel, Auctions: A Survey of Experimental Research, in Handbook of Experimental Economics, p.501585, 1995.

E. E. Rutström and M. B. Williams, Entitlements and fairness:, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, vol.43, issue.1, p.7589, 2000.
DOI : 10.1016/S0167-2681(00)00109-8

R. H. Thaler and E. J. Johnson, Gambling with the House Money and Trying to Break Even: The Effects of Prior Outcomes on Risky Choice, Management Science, vol.36, issue.6, pp.36-643660, 1990.
DOI : 10.1287/mnsc.36.6.643

W. Vickrey, COUNTERSPECULATION, AUCTIONS, AND COMPETITIVE SEALED TENDERS, The Journal of Finance, vol.16, issue.1, p.837, 1961.
DOI : 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1961.tb02789.x

R. Zeiliger, A presentation of Regate, Internet based Software for Experimental Economics, 2000.