HAL will be down for maintenance from Friday, June 10 at 4pm through Monday, June 13 at 9am. More information
Skip to Main content Skip to Navigation
Journal articles

How fair is pricing perceived to be? An empirical study

Abstract : The perceived fairness of different rules for allocating scarce resources is analysed in two cases: seats on a high speed train and parking spaces in a company car park. Attitudes toward allocation rules depend on context. They vary according to: the educational level of respondents; the type of "good"; and the exceptional or recurring nature of scarcity. Peak pricing, administrative and lottery rules are seen as the most unfair, together with queuing in some cases. The moral rule is considered to be the fairest one, except by more educated people who prefer the compensation rule.
Document type :
Journal articles
Complete list of metadata

Cited literature [37 references]  Display  Hide  Download

https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00372115
Contributor : Martine Sefsaf Connect in order to contact the contributor
Submitted on : Tuesday, November 4, 2014 - 4:02:45 PM
Last modification on : Tuesday, March 29, 2022 - 7:36:02 PM
Long-term archiving on: : Thursday, February 5, 2015 - 11:21:08 AM

File

Raux_Souche_Croissant_How_fair...
Publisher files allowed on an open archive

Identifiers

Citation

Charles Raux, Stéphanie Souche, Yves Croissant. How fair is pricing perceived to be? An empirical study. Public Choice, Springer Verlag, 2009, 139 (1-2), pp.227-240. ⟨10.1007/s11127-008-9390-y⟩. ⟨halshs-00372115⟩

Share

Metrics

Record views

166

Files downloads

259