H. Alpert, The social sciences and the National Science Foundation: 1945-1955, American Sociological Review, vol.20, issue.6, pp.653-60, 1955.

. American, American National Standard for the preparation of scientific papers for written or oral presentation, 1979.

, Style Guide, 1997.

M. Amiot, Contre l'Etat les sociologues, Ecole des hautes études en sciences sociales, 1986.

C. Bazerman, Shaping written knowledge: the genre and activity of the experimental article in science, 1988.

D. Beaver and R. Rosen, Studies in scientific collaboration: part I. The professional origins of scientific co-authorship, Scientometrics, vol.1, issue.1, pp.65-84, 1978.

D. Beaver and R. Rosen, Studies in scientific collaboration: part II. Scientific co-authorship, research productivity and visibility in the French scientific elite, Scientometrics, vol.1, issue.2, pp.133-182, 1979.

D. Beaver and R. Rosen, Studies in scientific collaboration: part III. Professionalization and the natural history of modern scientific co-authorship, Scientometrics, vol.1, issue.3, pp.231-276, 1979.

J. Ben-david, Scientific Growth: Essays on the Social Organization and Ethos of Science, 1991.

A. D. Biderman and E. T. Crawford, Paper-money: trends of research sponsorship in American sociology journals, Social Science Information/Information sur les sciences sociales, vol.9, pp.51-77, 1970.

M. Bulmer, Quantification and Chicago social science in the 1920s: a negleted tradition, Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, vol.17, pp.312-343, 1981.

C. Camic and Y. Xie, The statistical turn in American social science: Columbia university, 1890 to 1915, American Sociological Review, vol.59, issue.6, pp.773-805, 1994.

J. Chapoulie, La seconde fondation de la sociologie française, les Etats-Unis et la classe ouvrière, Revue Française de Sociologie, vol.32, issue.3, pp.321-61, 1991.

A. Chenu, La non-professionnalisation de la sociologie française. Les sociologues, l'université de masse et le marché de l'emploi, 1998.

D. E. Chubin, The journal as a primary data source in the sociology of science: with some observations from sociology, Social Science Information/Information sur les sciences sociales, vol.14, issue.1, pp.157-68, 1975.

T. N. Clark, Clientelism and universalism: Columbia sociology under Merton and Lazarsfeld, Paul Lazarsfeld 1901-1976. La sociologie de Vienne à, 1998.

P. Dear, The literary structure of scientific arguments, 1991.

A. Drouard, Réflexions sur une chronologie: le développement des sciences sociales en France de 1945 à la fin des années soixante, Revue Française de Sociologie, vol.23, issue.1, pp.55-85, 1982.

D. Edge, Quantitative measures of communication in science: a critical review, History of Science, vol.17, pp.102-136, 1979.

J. W. Endersby, Collaborative research in the social sciences: multiple authorship and publication credit, Social Science Quarterly, vol.77, issue.2, pp.375-92, 1996.

F. Farrugia, Généalogie d'une professionnalisation: la sociologie française de 1945 à 1960, L'Homme et la Société, vol.131, pp.23-42, 1999.

E. M. Gerson, Scientific work and social worlds. Knowledge: Creation, Diffusion, Utilization, vol.4, pp.357-377, 1983.

N. D. Glenn, American sociologists' evaluation of sixty-three journals, American Sociologist, vol.6, issue.4, pp.298-303, 1971.

L. Hargens, Impressions and misimpressions abouts sociology journals, Contemporary Sociology, vol.20, pp.343-352, 1991.

A. G. Heffner, Funded research, mutiple authorship, and subauthorship collaboration in four disciplines, Scientometrics, vol.3, issue.1, pp.5-12, 1981.

W. I. Jenkins and I. Velody, The social sciences and government: do the natural sciences show the prescribed path ?, Social Science Information/Information sur les sciences sociales, vol.9, pp.91-118, 1970.

J. Katz, B. R. Sylvan, and . Martin, What is research collaboration ?, Research Policy, vol.26, issue.1, pp.1-18, 1997.

W. Lepenies, Between literature and science: The rise of sociology, 1988.

J. L. Mccartney, On being scientific: changing styles of presentation of sociological research, American Sociologist, vol.5, issue.1, pp.30-35, 1970.

J. L. Mccartney, The financing of sociologcal research: trends and consequences, The Phenomenon of Sociology, pp.384-97, 1971.

H. Mendras, Comment devenir sociologue. Souvenirs d'un vieux mandarin, 1995.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01390123

L. Mucchielli, La Découverte du social: naissance de la sociologie en France (1870-1914), 1998.

M. Oromaner, The impact of sponsored and non-sponsored publication in sociology, American Sociologist, vol.9, issue.1, pp.36-45, 1974.

M. Oromaner, Collaboration and impact: the career of multi-authored publications, Social Science Information/Information sur les sciences sociales, vol.14, pp.147-55, 1975.

N. Patel, Quantitative and collaborative trends in American sociological research, American Sociologist, vol.7, issue.1, pp.5-6, 1972.

N. Patel, Collaboration in the professionnal growth of American sociology, Social Science Information/Information sur les sciences sociales, vol.12, issue.6, pp.77-92, 1973.

R. Perrucci, K. O. Flaherty, and H. Marshall, Market conditions, productivity and promotion among university faculty, Research in Higher Education, vol.19, pp.431-480, 1983.

O. Piriou, La sociologie: métier ou profession ? Quand les sociologues prennent position sur l'exercice de la sociologie, L'Homme et la Société, vol.131, pp.43-64, 1999.

M. Pollak, La planification des sciences sociales, Actes de la Recherche en Sciences Sociales, vol.2, issue.3, pp.105-126, 1976.

M. Pollak, Paul F. Lazarsfeld, fondateur d'une multinationale scientifique, Actes de la Recherche en Sciences Sociales, vol.25, pp.45-59, 1979.

D. Pontille, Figures de la signature scientifique, Cahiers Internationaux de Sociologie, vol.109, pp.283-316, 2000.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00261740

D. Pontille, La Signature scientifique: espaces d'inscription et mises en ordre. Thesis, département de sociologie, 2000.

D. J. Price, Little science, big science, 1963.

D. Ross, The origins of American social science, 1991.

R. Sainsaulieu, La profession de sociologue en France, Les champs de la sociologie française, pp.247-56, 1988.

E. Shanas, The American Journal of Sociology through fifty years, American Journal of Sociology, vol.50, pp.522-555, 1945.

R. L. Simpson, Expanding and declining fields in American sociology, American Sociological Review, vol.26, issue.3, pp.458-66, 1961.

A. Strauss, Social worlds and legitimation processes, Studies in Symbolic Interaction, pp.171-190, 1982.

S. P. Turner and J. H. Turner, The impossible science: an institutional analysis of American sociology, 1990.

J. J. Wanderer, Academic origins of contributors to the, American Sociological Review. American Sociologist, vol.1, issue.5, pp.241-244, 1966.

M. Wieviorka, Postface : La sociologie sous tension, Cahiers Internationaux de Sociologie, vol.101, pp.319-351, 1996.

N. Wiley, Recent journal sociology: the substitution of method for theory, Contemporary Sociology, vol.8, pp.793-802, 1979.

P. Wilner, The main drift of sociology between 1936 and 1982, History of Sociology, vol.5, issue.2, pp.1-20, 1985.

A. Wolfe, Books vs. articles: two ways of publishing sociology, Sociological Forum, vol.5, issue.3, pp.466-89, 1990.

W. C. Yoels, Destiny or dynasty: doctoral origins and appointment patterns of editors of the American Sociological Review, American Sociologist, vol.6, issue.2, pp.134-143, 1971.

W. C. Yoels, The structure of fields and the allocation of editorships on scientific journals: some observations on the politics of knowledge, Sociological Quarterly, vol.15, pp.264-76, 1974.

H. A. Zuckerman, Nobel laureates: sociological studies of scientific collaboration, 1965.