, Une telle perspective oblige à considérer différents niveaux d'investigation : la nature (plus fondamentale ou plus appliquée) des savoirs produits au sein d'un espace disciplinaire ; l'organisation sociocognitive de la recherche et plus spécifiquement les compétences (mono ou multidisciplinaires) qui y sont requises, tout comme le rôle des éditeurs dans le cadrage des pratiques ; mais également les liens tissés entre univers académique, industriel, et gouvernemental, et la place de cet espace dans cette triade. De ces divers niveaux dépendent les formes d'appropriation possibles, et donc la définition spécifique de l'auteur qui peut en découler. C'est au prix d'un tel travail nourri empiriquement qu

, Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct, American Psychologist, vol.47, pp.1597-1611, 1992.

, Publication Manual, American Psychological Association, 1994.

C. Bazerman, Shaping written knowledge: the genre and activity of the experimental article in science, 1988.

R. Bhopal, J. Rankin, E. Mccoll, L. H. Thomas, E. Kaner et al., The vexed question of authorship: views of researchers in British Medical faculty, British Medical Journal, vol.314, issue.7086, pp.1009-1012, 1997.

M. Biagioli, Aporias of scientific authorship. Credit and responsibility in contemporary biomedicine, The science studies reader. New York: Routledge, pp.12-30, 1999.

C. A. Bridgwater, P. H. Bornstein, and J. Et-walkenbach, Ethical issues in the assignment of publication credit, American Psychologist, vol.36, pp.524-525, 1981.

W. Broad and N. Wade, La Souris truquée, enquête sur la fraude scientifique, 1987.

R. Chartier, Figures de l'auteur, Culture écrite et société. L'ordre des livres, pp.45-80, 1996.

M. Couturier, La Figure de l'auteur, 1995.

E. Digiusto, Equity in authorship: a strategy for assigning credit when publishing, Social Science and Medicine, vol.38, issue.1, pp.55-58, 1994.

J. P. Drenth, Multiple authorship: the contribution of senior authors, Journal of the American Medical Association, vol.280, issue.3, pp.219-221, 1998.

S. Eastwood, P. Derish, E. Leash, and S. Ordway, Ethical issues in biomedical research: perceptions and practices of postdoctoral research fellows responding to a survey, Sci Eng Ethics, vol.2, pp.89-114, 1996.

E. L. Eisenstein, La Révolution de l'imprimé dans l'Europe des premiers temps modernes, 1991.

J. W. Endersby, Collaborative research in the social sciences: multiple authorship and publication credit, Social Science Quarterly, vol.77, issue.2, pp.375-392, 1996.

R. L. Engler, J. W. Covell, P. J. Friedman, P. S. Kitcher, and R. M. Peters, Misrepresentation and responsibility in medical research, New England Journal of Medicine, vol.317, pp.1383-1389, 1987.

R. J. Epstein, Six authors in search of a citation: villains or victims of the Vancouver convention?, British Medical Journal, vol.306, p.765, 1993.

M. A. Fine and L. A. Kurdek, Reflections on determining authorship credit and authorship order on faculty-student collaborations, American Psychologist, vol.48, issue.11, pp.1141-1147, 1993.

A. Flanagin, L. A. Carey, and P. B. Fontanarosa, Prevalence of articles with honorary authors and ghost authors in peer-reviewed medical journal, Journal of the American Medical Association, vol.280, issue.3, pp.222-224, 1998.

M. Foucault, Qu'est-ce qu'un auteur ?, Bulletin de la Société Française de Philosophie, vol.63, issue.3, pp.73-104, 1969.

B. Fraenkel, La Signature: genèse d'un signe, Gallimard, Bibliothèque des Histoires, 1992.

B. Fraenkel, Une enquête sur le service du courrier présidentiel, Par Ecrit. Ethnologie des écritures quotidiennes, pp.243-271, 1997.

P. Galison, The collective author" Papier présenté au meeting intitulé 'What is a scientific author?, 1997.

F. Godlee, Definition of "authorship" may be changed, British Medical Journal, vol.312, pp.1501-1502, 1996.

N. W. Goodman, Survey of fulfillment of criteria for authorship in published medical research, British Medical Journal, vol.309, p.1482, 1994.

W. O. Hagstrom, Gift giving as an organizing principle in science, Science in context, pp.21-34, 1982.

W. P. Hoen, H. C. Walvoort, and A. J. Et-overbeke, What are the factors determining authorship and the order of the authors'names: a study among authors of the Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Geneeskunde, Journal of the American Medical Association, vol.280, issue.3, pp.217-218, 1998.

R. Horton and R. Smith, Time to redefine authorship, British Medical Journal, vol.312, issue.7033, p.723, 1996.

E. J. Huth, Abuses and uses of authorship, Annals of Internal Medicine, vol.104, pp.266-267, 1986.

, Guidelines on authorship, International Committee of Medical Journal Editors, vol.291, p.722, 1985.

, Uniform requirements for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals, International Committee of Medical Journal Editors, vol.269, pp.2282-2286, 1993.

, Uniform requirements for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals, International Committee of Medical Journal Editors, vol.277, pp.927-934, 1997.

, Uniform requirements for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals, International Committee of Medical Journal Editors, 2000.

E. Leash, Is it time for a new approach to authorship?, Journal of Dental Research, vol.76, issue.3, pp.724-727, 1997.

C. Licoppe, La Formation de la pratique scientifique. Le discours de l'expérience en France et en Angleterre, pp.1630-1820, 1996.

T. Luukkonen, O. Persson, and G. Sivertsen, Understanding patterns of international scientific collaboration, Technology & Human Values, vol.17, issue.1, pp.101-126, 1992.

R. K. Merton, The Matthew effect in science, Science, vol.159, issue.3810, pp.56-63, 1968.

S. D. Moulopoulos, D. A. Sideras, and K. A. Georgilis, Individual contributions to multiauthor papers, British Medical Journal, vol.287, pp.1608-1618, 1983.

R. Over and S. Smallman, Maintenance of individual visibility in publication of collaborative research by psychologists, American Psychologist, vol.28, pp.161-166, 1973.

D. Pontille, La Signature scientifique: espaces d'inscription et mises en ordre, 2000.

D. ;. Rennie, J. Biagioli, P. Crane, M. Derish, D. Gruber et al., Solutions, 1999.

. Horton, CBE task force on authorship: draft white paper

D. Rennie and A. Et-flanagin, Authorship! Authorship! Ghosts, guests, and grafters, and the two-sided coin, Journal of the American Medical Association, vol.271, pp.469-471, 1994.

D. Rennie, V. Yank, and L. Emanuel, When authorship fails: a proposal to make contributors accountable, Journal of the American Medical Association, vol.278, pp.579-585, 1997.

M. Saffran, On multiple authorship: describe the contribution, The Scientist, vol.2, p.9, 1989.

S. Shapin, The invisible technician, American Scientist, vol.77, pp.554-563, 1989.

S. Shapin, A social history of truth: civility and science in seventeenth-century, 1994.

D. W. Shapiro, N. S. Wenger, and M. F. Shapiro, The contributions of authors to multiauthored biomedical research papers, Journal of the American Medical Association, vol.271, pp.483-442, 1994.

J. Smith, Gift authorship: a poisoned chalice, British Medical Journal, vol.309, pp.1456-57, 1994.

R. Smith, Authorship is dying: long live contributorship, British Medical Journal, vol.315, issue.7110, 1997.

R. Smith, Authorship: time for a paradigm shift, British Medical Journal, vol.314, 1997.

D. Spiegel and P. Keith-spiegel, Assignment of publication credits: ethics and practices of psychologists, American Psychologist, vol.25, pp.738-747, 1970.

P. E. Stephan and S. G. Levin, The critical importance of careers in collaborative scientific research, Revue d'Economie Industrielle, vol.79, issue.1, pp.45-61, 1997.

, The construction of authorship. Textual appropriation in law and literature, 1994.

V. Yank and D. Rennie, Disclosure of researcher contributions: a study of original research articles in The Lancet, Annals of Internal Medicine, vol.130, pp.661-670, 1999.

H. A. Zuckerman, Patterns of name ordering among authors of scientific papers: a study of social symbolism and its ambiguity, American Journal of Sociology, vol.74, issue.3, pp.276-291, 1968.

H. A. Zuckerman and R. K. Et-merton, Patterns of evaluation in science: institutionalization, structure and functions of the referee system, Minerva, vol.9, issue.1, pp.66-100, 1971.