C. Bazerman, Shaping written knowledge: the genre and activity of the experimental article in science, 1988.

R. Bhopal, J. Rankin, E. Mccoll, L. H. Thomas, E. Kaner et al., The vexed question of authorship: views of researchers in a British medical faculty, BMJ, vol.314, issue.7086, pp.1009-1012, 1997.
DOI : 10.1136/bmj.314.7086.1009

M. Biagioli, Aporias of scientific authorship. Credit and responsibility in contemporary biomedicine The science studies reader, pp.12-30, 1999.

C. A. Bridgwater, P. H. Bornstein, and J. Et-walkenbach, Ethical issues and the assignment of publication credit., American Psychologist, vol.36, issue.5, pp.524-525, 1981.
DOI : 10.1037/0003-066X.36.5.524

W. Broad and N. Et-wade, La Souris truquée, enquête sur la fraude scientifique, 1987.

R. Chartier, Figures de l'auteur " In Culture écrite et société. L'ordre des livres (XIVe -XVIIIe siècle), pp.45-80, 1996.

M. Couturier, La Figure de l'auteur, 1995.

E. Digiusto, Equity in authorship: A strategy for assigning credit when publishing, Social Science & Medicine, vol.38, issue.1, pp.55-58, 1994.
DOI : 10.1016/0277-9536(94)90299-2

J. P. Drenth, Multiple Authorship, JAMA, vol.280, issue.3, pp.219-221, 1998.
DOI : 10.1001/jama.280.3.219

S. Eastwood, P. Derish, E. Leash, and S. Et-ordway, Ethical issues in biomedical research: Perceptions and practices of postdoctoral research fellows responding to a survey, Science and Engineering Ethics, vol.58, issue.supplement, pp.89-114, 1996.
DOI : 10.1007/BF02639320

E. L. Eisenstein, La Révolution de l'imprimé dans l'Europe des premiers temps modernes, 1991.

J. W. Endersby, Collaborative research in the social sciences: multiple authorship and publication credit, Social Science Quarterly, vol.77, issue.2, pp.375-392, 1996.

R. L. Engler, J. W. Covell, P. J. Friedman, P. S. Kitcher, and R. M. Et-peters, Misrepresentation and Responsibility in Medical Research, New England Journal of Medicine, vol.317, issue.22, pp.1383-1389, 1987.
DOI : 10.1056/NEJM198711263172205

R. J. Epstein, Six authors in search of a citation: villains or victims of the Vancouver convention?, BMJ, vol.306, issue.6880, p.765, 1993.
DOI : 10.1136/bmj.306.6880.765

M. A. Fine and L. A. Et-kurdek, Reflections on determining authorship credit and authorship order on faculty^student collaborations., American Psychologist, vol.48, issue.11, pp.1141-1147, 1993.
DOI : 10.1037/0003-066X.48.11.1141

A. Flanagin, L. A. Carey, and P. B. Et-fontanarosa, Prevalence of Articles With Honorary Authors and Ghost Authors in Peer-Reviewed Medical Journals, JAMA, vol.280, issue.3, pp.222-224, 1998.
DOI : 10.1001/jama.280.3.222

M. Foucault, Qu'est-ce qu'un auteur ?, Bulletin de la Société Française de Philosophie, vol.63, issue.3, pp.73-104, 1969.

B. Fraenkel, La Signature: genèse d'un signe, 1992.

B. Fraenkel, Répondre à tous Une enquête sur le service du courrier présidentiel, pp.243-271, 1997.

P. Galison, The collective author " Papier présenté au meeting intitulé 'What is a scientific author, pp.7-9, 1997.

F. Godlee, Definition of "authorship" may be changed, BMJ, vol.312, issue.7045, pp.1501-1502, 1996.
DOI : 10.1136/bmj.312.7045.1501a

N. W. Goodman, Survey of fulfilment of criteria for authorship in published medical research, BMJ, vol.309, issue.6967, p.1482, 1994.
DOI : 10.1136/bmj.309.6967.1482

W. O. Hagstrom, Gift giving as an organizing principle in science, Science in context, pp.21-34, 1982.

W. P. Hoen, H. C. Walvoort, and A. J. Et-overbeke, What are the factors determining authorship and the order of the authors'names: a study among authors of the, Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Geneeskunde (Dutch Journal of Medicine) Journal of the American Medical Association, vol.280, issue.3, pp.217-218, 1998.

R. Horton, . Smith, and E. J. Huth, Time to redefine authorship Abuses and uses of authorship, British Medical Journal Annals of Internal Medicine, vol.312, issue.104, pp.723-266, 1986.

E. Leash, Is It Time for a New Approach to Authorship?, Journal of Dental Research, vol.76, issue.3, pp.724-727, 1997.
DOI : 10.1177/00220345970760030101

C. Licoppe, La Formation de la pratique scientifique. Le discours de l'expérience en France et en Angleterre (1630-1820), 1996.

T. Luukkonen, O. Persson, and G. Et-sivertsen, Understanding Patterns of International Scientific Collaboration, Science, Technology & Human Values, vol.17, issue.1, pp.101-126, 1992.
DOI : 10.1177/016224399201700106

R. K. Merton, The Matthew Effect in Science: The reward and communication systems of science are considered, Science, vol.159, issue.3810, pp.56-63, 1968.
DOI : 10.1126/science.159.3810.56

S. D. Moulopoulos, D. A. Sideras, and K. A. Et-georgilis, For debate . . . Individual contributions to multiauthor papers., BMJ, vol.287, issue.6405, pp.1608-1618, 1983.
DOI : 10.1136/bmj.287.6405.1608

R. Over and S. Et-smallman, Maintenance of individual visibility in publication of collaborative research by psychologists., American Psychologist, vol.28, issue.2, pp.161-166, 1973.
DOI : 10.1037/h0034242

D. Pontille, La Signature scientifique: espaces d'inscription et mises en ordre, Thèse nouveau régime, 2000.

D. Rennie and A. Et-flanagin, Authorship! Authorship!, JAMA, vol.271, issue.6, pp.469-471, 1994.
DOI : 10.1001/jama.1994.03510300075043

D. Rennie, V. Yank, and L. Emanuel, When Authorship Fails, JAMA, vol.278, issue.7, pp.579-585, 1997.
DOI : 10.1001/jama.1997.03550070071041

M. Saffran, On multiple authorship: describe the contribution, The Scientist, vol.2, p.9, 1989.

S. Shapin, The invisible technician, American Scientist, vol.77, pp.554-563, 1989.

S. Shapin, A social history of truth: civility and science in seventeenth-century, 1994.

D. W. Shapiro, N. S. Wenger, and M. F. Shapiro, The contributions of authors to multiauthored biomedical research papers, Journal of the American Medical Association, vol.271, pp.483-442, 1994.

J. Smith, Gift authorship: a poisoned chalice?, BMJ, vol.309, issue.6967, pp.1456-57, 1994.
DOI : 10.1136/bmj.309.6967.1456

R. Smith, Authorship is dying: long live contributorship, BMJ, vol.315, issue.7110, 1997.
DOI : 10.1136/bmj.315.7110.696

R. Smith, Authorship: time for a paradigm shift?, BMJ, vol.314, issue.7086, p.992, 1997.
DOI : 10.1136/bmj.314.7086.992

D. Spiegel and P. Keith-spiegel, Assignment of publication credits: Ethics and practices of psychologists., American Psychologist, vol.25, issue.8, pp.738-747, 1970.
DOI : 10.1037/h0029769

P. E. Stephan and S. G. Et-levin, The Critical Importance of Careers in Collaborative Scientific Research, Revue d'??conomie industrielle, vol.79, issue.1, pp.45-61, 1997.
DOI : 10.3406/rei.1997.1652

M. Woodmansee and P. Et-jaszi, The construction of authorship. Textual appropriation in law and literature, 1994.

V. Yank and D. Et-rennie, Disclosure of Researcher Contributions: A Study of Original Research Articles in The Lancet, Annals of Internal Medicine, vol.130, issue.8, pp.661-670, 1999.
DOI : 10.7326/0003-4819-130-8-199904200-00013

H. A. Zuckerman, Patterns of Name Ordering Among Authors of Scientific Papers: A Study of Social Symbolism and Its Ambiguity, American Journal of Sociology, vol.74, issue.3, pp.276-291, 1968.
DOI : 10.1086/224641

H. A. Zuckerman and R. K. Et-merton, Patterns of evaluation in science: Institutionalisation, structure and functions of the referee system, Minerva, vol.9, issue.1, pp.66-100, 1971.
DOI : 10.1007/BF01553188