L'argument du sens commun et la « persécution des scientifiques ». Collingwood contre Moore

Abstract : Drawing mainly on the Essay on Philosophical Method (1933) and on The New Leviathan (1942), this paper sets out R. G. Collingwood's main arguments against G. E. Moore's appeal to common sense. According to The New Leviathan, the recourse to common sense as a safeguard against scepticism or idealism leads to “scientific persecution” and “obscurantism”. That view might be considered as excessive. However, after a close examination of the structure of the commonsensist argument, Collingwood's critique appears to be relevant. This does not prevent him from using the notion of common sense, understood as a set of basic beliefs. There is no contradiction here, provided that we distinguish the notion of common sense from the argument from common sense.
Document type :
Journal articles
Complete list of metadatas

Cited literature [3 references]  Display  Hide  Download

https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00162875
Contributor : Laurent Jaffro <>
Submitted on : Monday, July 16, 2007 - 12:48:46 PM
Last modification on : Saturday, May 11, 2019 - 8:28:06 AM
Long-term archiving on : Thursday, April 8, 2010 - 8:21:37 PM

File

Jaffro_Collingwood_Moore_sens_...
Files produced by the author(s)

Identifiers

  • HAL Id : halshs-00162875, version 1

Citation

Laurent Jaffro. L'argument du sens commun et la « persécution des scientifiques ». Collingwood contre Moore. Philosophiques, Editions Bellarmin, 2009, 36 (1), pp.131-147. ⟨halshs-00162875⟩

Share

Metrics

Record views

359

Files downloads

726