R. Natalia-andronova, M. E. Schlesinger, S. Dessai, M. Hulme, and B. Li, The concept of climate sensitivity: history and development. In Human-Induced Climate Change. An inter-disciplinary assessment , chapter 1, 2007.

A. Ayoun and P. Smets, Data association in multi-target detection using the transferable belief model, International Journal of Intelligent Systems, vol.16, issue.10, pp.1167-1182, 2001.
DOI : 10.1002/int.1054

C. Estimating and . Sensitivity, Board on Atmospheric Sciences and Climate, Division of Earth and Life Studies , National Research Council of the National Academies, The National Academies Press, 2003.

T. Robert, R. L. Clemen, and . Winkler, Combining probability distributions from experts in risk analysis, Risk Analysis, vol.19, issue.2, pp.187-203, 1999.

R. Barry, P. P. Cobb, and . Shenoy, On the plausibility transformation method for translating belief function models to probability models, International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, vol.41, issue.3, pp.314-330, 2006.

R. M. Cooke and L. J. Goossens, Procedures guide for structured experts judgment, Nuclear Science and Technology (EURATOM), 1999.

A. P. Dempster, Upper and Lower Probabilities Induced by a Multivalued Mapping, The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, vol.38, issue.2, pp.325-339, 1967.
DOI : 10.1214/aoms/1177698950

T. Denoeux, The cautious rule of combination for belief functions and some extensions, 2006 9th International Conference on Information Fusion, 2006.
DOI : 10.1109/ICIF.2006.301572

T. Denoeux, Conjunctive and disjunctive combination of belief functions induced by nondistinct bodies of evidence, Artificial Intelligence, vol.172, issue.2-3, pp.234-264, 2008.
DOI : 10.1016/j.artint.2007.05.008

S. Destercke, D. Dubois, and E. Chojnacki, Fusion d'opinions d'experts et théories de l'incertain, LFA'06. Rencontres Francophones sur la Logique Floue et Applications, 2006.

D. Dubois, H. Prade, and P. Smets, A definition of subjective possibility, International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, vol.48, issue.2, 2008.
DOI : 10.1016/j.ijar.2007.01.005

J. W. Hall, G. Fu, and J. Lawry, Imprecise probabilities of climate change: aggregation of fuzzy scenarios and model uncertainties, Climatic Change, vol.20, issue.5???6, pp.3-4, 2007.
DOI : 10.1007/s10584-006-9175-6

G. C. Hegerl, T. J. Crowley, W. T. Hyde, and D. J. Frame, Climate sensitivity constrained by temperature reconstructions over the past seven centuries, Nature, vol.13, issue.7087, pp.1029-1032, 2006.
DOI : 10.1038/nature04679

G. C. Hegerl, F. W. Zwiers, P. Braconnot, N. P. Gillett, Y. Luo et al., Understanding and attributing climate change. In Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, 2007.

I. and C. Change, Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Published for the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change by GRID Arendal, 2001.

I. and C. Change, the scientific basis URL http://www.ipcc.ch/. Contribution of the Working Group I to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. IPCC. Guidance notes for lead authors of the IPCC fourth assessment report on addressing uncertainties, pp.2007-2014, 2001.

D. W. Keith, When is it appropriate to combine expert judgments? Climatic Change, pp.139-144, 1996.

E. Kriegler, Imprecise probability analysis for integrated assessment of climate change. Doctoral thesis, University of Potsdam (Germany ), 2005.

E. Kriegler and H. Held, Utilizing belief functions for the estimation of future climate change, International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, vol.39, issue.2-3, pp.185-209, 2005.
DOI : 10.1016/j.ijar.2004.10.005

T. Samuel-kuhn, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 1962.

M. , G. Morgan, and D. W. Keith, Subjective judgments by climate experts, Environmental Science and Technology, vol.29, issue.10, pp.468-476, 1995.

R. National and . Council, Carbon Dioxide and Climate: A Scientific Assessment Ad Hoc Study Group on Carbon Dioxide and Climate. Also known as 'The Charney committee report, 1979.

M. E. Newman, Coauthorship networks and patterns of scientific collaboration, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, pp.5200-5205, 2004.
DOI : 10.1073/pnas.0307545100

F. Ouchi, A literature review on the use of expert opinion in probabilistic risk analysis, 2004.
DOI : 10.1596/1813-9450-3201

D. A. Randall, R. A. Wood, S. Bony, R. Colman, T. Fichefet et al., Climate models and their evaluation In Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, 2007.

P. Reichert and D. W. Keith, Bayesian combination of expert judgments: reinterpretation of the meaning and dependence of elicited distributions, 2001.

S. A. Sandri, D. Dubois, and H. W. Kalfsbeek, Elicitation, assessment, and pooling of expert judgments using possibility theory, Corrections were published in the next issue, pp.313-335, 1995.
DOI : 10.1109/91.413236

J. Schubert, Cluster-based specification techniques in Dempster-Shafer theory, Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning and Uncertainty, pp.395-404, 1995.
DOI : 10.1007/3-540-60112-0_45

G. Shafer, A Mathematical Theory of Evidence, pp.0-608, 1976.

G. Shafer, Perspectives on the theory and practice of belief functions, International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, vol.4, issue.5-6, pp.323-362, 1990.
DOI : 10.1016/0888-613X(90)90012-Q

P. Smets, The Nature of the unnormalized Beliefs encountered in the Transferable Belief Model, Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence 92, pp.292-297, 1992.
DOI : 10.1016/B978-1-4832-8287-9.50044-X

P. Smets, The canonical decomposition of a weighted belief, International Joint Conference on AI, pp.1896-1901, 1995.

P. Smets, Quantified epistemic possibility theory seen as an hyper cautious Transferable Belief Model, Rencontres Francophones sur la Logique Floue et ses Applications, pp.343-353, 2000.

P. Smets, The application of the matrix calculus to belief functions, International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, vol.31, issue.1-2, pp.1-30, 2002.
DOI : 10.1016/S0888-613X(02)00066-X

P. Smets, Decision making in the TBM: the necessity of the pignistic transformation, International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, vol.38, issue.2, pp.133-147, 2005.
DOI : 10.1016/j.ijar.2004.05.003

P. Smets, Analyzing the combination of conflicting belief functions Information fusion, pp.387-412, 2007.

C. M. Matthias and . Troffaes, Decision making under uncertainty using imprecise probabilities, International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, vol.45, issue.1, pp.17-29, 2007.

P. Jeroen and . Van-der-sluijs, Anchoring amid uncertainty On the management of uncertainties in risk assessment of anthropogenic climate change, 1997.

T. S. Wallsten, D. V. Budescu, A. Rapoport, R. Swick, and B. Forsyth, Measuring the vague meanings of probability terms., Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, vol.115, issue.4, pp.348-365, 1986.
DOI : 10.1037/0096-3445.115.4.348

M. D. Webster and A. P. Sokolov, A methodology for quantifying uncertainty in climate projections, Climatic Change, vol.46, issue.4, pp.417-446, 2000.
DOI : 10.1023/A:1005685317358

C. Weiss, Expressing scientific uncertainty. Law, Probability and Risk, pp.25-46, 2003.
DOI : 10.1093/lpr/2.1.25

URL : http://lpr.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/2/1/25

A. Ben-yaghlane, T. Denoeux, and K. Melloui, Elicitation of Expert Opinions for Constructing Belief Functions, Proceedings of IPMU'2006, pp.403-411, 2006.
DOI : 10.1142/9789812792358_0006

L. A. Zadeh, Fuzzy sets as a basis for a theory of possibility. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, Reprinted in Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol.199, issue.100, pp.3-3880004, 1978.

L. A. Zadeh, On the validity of Dempster's rule of combination of evidence, 1979.