. Cette-approche-se-situe-entre-la-prospective and . La-prévision-puisqu, elle aboutit à quantifier les croyances sur les futurs décrits, sans toutefois leur assigner de probabilité précise Les deux conséquences pratiques importantes de cette théorie sont : ? Dans une situation d'incertitude définie par une distribution de possibilité, l'intervalle canonique est la coupe au niveau de possibilité 0.5. En termes subjectifs, cela revient à définir deux dispositions à parier. L'intervalle doit être suffisament large pour qu'on accepte de parier 1 :1 qu'il contient la bonne valeur

J. Abellan and S. Moral, A NON-SPECIFICITY MEASURE FOR CONVEX SETS OF PROBABILITY DISTRIBUTIONS, International Symposium on Imprecise Probabilities and Their Applications Ghe, pp.357-368, 1999.
DOI : 10.1142/S0218488500000253

J. Abellan and S. Moral, MAXIMUM OF ENTROPY FOR CREDAL SETS, International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems, vol.11, issue.05, pp.587-598, 2003.
DOI : 10.1142/S021848850300234X

M. Allais, Le Comportement de l'Homme Rationnel devant le Risque: Critique des Postulats et Axiomes de l'Ecole Americaine, Econometrica, vol.21, issue.4, pp.503-546, 1953.
DOI : 10.2307/1907921

M. Allen, S. Raper, and J. Mitchell, CLIMATE CHANGE: Uncertainty in the IPCC's Third Assessment Report, Science, vol.293, issue.5529, pp.430-433, 2001.
DOI : 10.1126/science.1062823

. Wallace, Abrupt climate change, Science, vol.299, pp.2005-2010, 2003.

P. Ambrosi, J. Hourcade, S. Hallegatte, F. Lecocq, P. Dumas et al., Optimal control models and elicitation of attitudes towards climate change. Environmental Modeling and Assessment, pp.135-147, 2003.

V. E. Archer and J. L. Lyon, Errors and biases in the diagnosis of cancer of the lung and their influence on risk estimates, Medical Hypotheses, vol.54, issue.3, pp.400-407, 2000.
DOI : 10.1054/mehy.1999.0860

J. Kenneth, A. C. Arrow, and . Fisher, Environmental preservation, uncertainty, and irreversibity, Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol.88, pp.312-319, 1974.

J. Aubin, A concise introduction to viability theory and optimal control, 1999.

E. Best, Probabilities ? help or hindrance in scenario planning The Global Business Network, 1991.

V. David, T. M. Budescu, and . Karelitz, Interpersonal communication of precise and imprecise subjective probabilities, 2003.

P. Canarelli, Fuzzy scenarios Institute for Perspective Technological Studies, European Union, Scenario Building : Convergences and differences, 1995.

T. J. Chermack, The mandate for theory in scenario planning, Futures Research Quarterly, vol.18, issue.2, pp.25-28, 2002.

T. Robert, R. L. Clemen, and . Winkler, Combining probability distributions from experts in risk analysis, Risk Analysis, vol.19, issue.2, pp.187-203, 1999.

M. Cohen and J. M. Tallon, Décision dans le risque et l'incertitude : l'apport des modèles non additifs. Revue d'Économie Politique, pp.631-681, 2000.

P. A. Frank and . Coolen, Statistical modeling of expert opinions using imprecise probabilities, 1994.

F. Cozman, A brief introduction to the theory of sets of probability measures, 1999.

G. De-cooman, The formal analogy between possibility and probability theory, Foundations and Applications of Possibility Theory ? Proceedings of FAPT '95, pp.88-98, 1995.

F. Bruno-de, E. Henry, . Kyburg-jr, E. Henry, . Kyburg-jr et al., La prévision : Ses lois logiques, ses sources subjectives URL http://www. numdam.org/item?id=AIHP_1937__7_1_1_0. Translated into English by Foresight : Its Logical Laws, its Subjective Sources, Studies in Subjective Probability, pp.1-68, 1937.

J. Hugues-de, La démarche prospective. un bref guide méthodologique, Futuribles, 1999.

A. P. Dempster, Upper and Lower Probabilities Induced by a Multivalued Mapping, The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, vol.38, issue.2, pp.325-339, 1967.
DOI : 10.1214/aoms/1177698950

URL : http://projecteuclid.org/download/pdf_1/euclid.aoms/1177698950

J. Dezert, Foundations for a new theory of plausible and paradoxical reasoning Information and Security Journal, An International Journal, 2002.

E. Diecidue and P. P. Wakker, On The Intuition Of Rank-Dependent Utility, SSRN Electronic Journal, 2000.
DOI : 10.2139/ssrn.244668

D. Dubois and H. Prade, La th??orie des possibilit??s, Revue de l'Electricit?? et de l'Electronique, vol.-, issue.07, 1988.
DOI : 10.3845/ree.2006.059

D. Dubois and H. Prade, Focusing vs. belief revision: A fundamental distinction when dealing with generic knowledge, Gabbay et al, pp.96-107, 1997.
DOI : 10.1007/BFb0035615

D. Dubois, H. Prade, and P. Smets, New Semantics for Quantitative Possibility Theory, Second International Symposium on Imprecise Probability and their Applications Cor, 2001.
DOI : 10.1007/3-540-44652-4_36

URL : http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.15.2882

D. Ellsberg, Risk, Ambiguity, and the Savage Axioms, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol.75, issue.4, pp.643-669, 1961.
DOI : 10.2307/1884324

URL : http://qje.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/75/4/643

D. Ellsberg and . Risk, Ambiguity and Decision. Studies in Philosophy. Routledge, 2001.

G. Larry, T. Epstein, and . Wang, Intertemporal asset pricing under knightian uncertainty, Econometrica, vol.62, issue.2, pp.283-322, 1994.

O. Favereau, La science économique entre deux siècles, La Recherche, vol.337, pp.62-67, 2000.

T. Gáspár and E. Nováky, Dilemmas for renewal of futures methodology, Futures, vol.34, issue.5, pp.365-379, 2002.
DOI : 10.1016/S0016-3287(01)00065-9

I. Gilboa and D. Schmeidler, Maxmin expected utility with non-unique prior, Journal of Mathematical Economics, vol.18, issue.2, pp.141-153, 1989.
DOI : 10.1016/0304-4068(89)90018-9

URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00753237

M. Godet, R. Monti, F. Meunier, and F. Roubelat, Scenarios and strategies. a toolbox for scenario planning, Disponible en Français, 2002.

I. J. Good, Kinds of Probability: Although there are at least five kinds of probability, we can get along with just one kind, Science, vol.129, issue.3347, pp.443-447, 1959.
DOI : 10.1126/science.129.3347.443

S. Greenland, Causality theory for policy uses of epidemiological measures, pp.291-301, 2002.

A. Grübler and N. Naki´cenovi´cnaki´cenovi´naki´cenovi´c, Identifying dangers in an uncertain climate, Nature, vol.412, issue.6842, p.15, 2001.
DOI : 10.1038/35083752

M. Ha-duong, Comment tenir compte de l'irréversibilité dans l'évaluation intégrée du changement climatique ? Thèse de doctorat, École des hautes Études en Sciences Sociales, vol.3505, 1998.

M. Ha-duong, Necessities and Problems of Coupling Climate and Socioeconomic Models for Integrated Assessments Studies from an Economist???s Point of View, Goals and Economic Instruments for the Achievement of Global Warming Mitigation in Europe Proceedings of the EU Advanced Study Course, pp.39-54, 1997.
DOI : 10.1007/978-94-011-4726-2_3

M. Ha-duong, Quasi-option value and climate policy choices, Energy Economics, vol.20, issue.5-6, pp.599-620, 1998.
DOI : 10.1016/S0140-9883(98)00011-5

URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00002457

M. Ha-duong, Perspectives sur le changement climatique. Natures -Sciences - Sociétés, pp.5-14, 2000.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00007467

M. Ha-duong, Should climatic change be mitigated ? Thoi Dai, pp.144-161, 2000.

M. Ha-duong, Transparency and control in engineering integrated assessment models, Integrated Assessment, vol.2, issue.4, pp.209-218, 2001.
DOI : 10.1023/A:1013384932008

URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00000681

M. Ha-duong, E. Casman, and M. Granger-morgan, Bounding Poorly Characterized Risks: A Lung Cancer Example, Risk Analysis, vol.26, issue.5, pp.1071-1083, 2004.
DOI : 10.1111/j.0272-4332.2004.00508.x

M. Ha-duong and P. Dumas, Nonlinearity and uncertain climate impacts In Challenges of a Changing Earth ? Global Change Open Science Conference, IGBP-IHCP-WCRP. Also presented at the EMF/IEW conference in Vienna, pp.10-13, 2001.

M. Ha-duong, M. J. Grubb, and J. Hourcade, Influence of socioeconomic inertia and uncertainty on optimal CO 2 -emission abatement, Nature, vol.390, pp.270-274, 1997.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00002452

M. Ha-duong and J. Hourcade, Policy framework and systems management of global climate change Encyclopedia of Life Support Systems, chapter 1.4.7, in Theme 'Natural Resource System Challenge II : Climate Change, Human Systems, and Policy', volume on 'Global Issues and Sustainable Development, 2002.

M. Ha-duong, J. Hourcade, and F. Lecocq, Dynamic consistency problems behind the Kyoto Protocol, International Journal of Environment and Pollution, vol.11, issue.4, pp.426-446, 1998.
DOI : 10.1504/IJEP.1999.002269

URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00002459

M. Ha-duong and D. Keith, Climate strategy with CO 2 capture from the air, NATO Advanced Research Workshop on Technological Choices for Sustainability, Piramida Hotel, pp.13-17, 2002.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00003926

M. Ha-duong and D. Keith, Carbon storage: the economic efficiency of storing CO 2 in leaky reservoirs, Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, vol.5, issue.3-4, 2003.
DOI : 10.1007/s10098-003-0213-z

URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00003927

M. Ha-duong, G. Mégie, and D. Hauglustaine, A pro-active stratospheric ozone protection scenario, Global Environmental Change, vol.13, issue.1, pp.43-49, 2003.
DOI : 10.1016/S0959-3780(02)00087-0

URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00001593

M. Ha-duong and N. Treich, Risk Aversion, Intergenerational Equity and Climate Change, Environmental and Resource Economics, vol.28, issue.2, pp.195-207, 2004.
DOI : 10.1023/B:EARE.0000029915.04325.25

URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00000680

R. E. Haber, R. H. Haber, A. Alique, and S. Ros, Application of knowledge-based systems for supervision and control of machining processes. volume IIhtm. 2 volume set. Vol. I 'Fundamentals' published dec, pp.981-983, 2001.

W. and M. Hanemann, Willingness To Pay and Willingness To Accept: How Much Can They Differ? Reply, American Economic Review, vol.93, issue.1, pp.635-647, 1991.
DOI : 10.1257/000282803321455449

A. Didier, J. Hauglustaine, and . Gérard, Present and future CFC and other trace gas warming : Results from a seasonal climate model, Annales Geophysicae, vol.9, pp.571-587, 1991.

C. Henry, Investment decisions under uncertainty : The " irreversibility effect, American Economic Review, vol.64, issue.6, pp.1006-1012, 1974.

C. Henry and M. Henry, Formalization and applications of the precautionary principle. Cahier 2002-008, Laboratoire d'Econométrie de l'École Polytechnique, 2002.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00243001

A. Heyting, Les fondements des mathématiques. Intuitionisme Théorie de la démonstration, 1955.

J. L. Horowitz and C. F. Manski, Imprecise identification from incomplete data, Second International Symposium on Imprecise Probability and their Applications Cor, 2001.

K. John, K. E. Horowitz, and . Mcconnel, A review of WTA/WTP studies, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, vol.44, pp.426-447, 2002.

J. Hourcade, Prospective de l'énergie et stratégies de développement dans le tiers monde, Thèse de doctorat d'etat en sciences economiques, 1984.

I. Le-changement-climatique, Dimensions économiques et sociales Dossiers et débats pour le développement durable (4D), 1996. ISBN 2-9511782-9-4 pour 4D, 2- 921146-56-8 pour Éditions Multimondes. URL http://www.ipcc.ch

I. and C. Change, Synthesis Report ISBN 0-521-01507-3. URL http://www.ipcc.ch. Available in French as, 2001.

C. Joslyn, MEASUREMENT OF POSSIBILISTIC HISTOGRAMS FROM INTERVAL DATA, International Journal of General Systems, vol.18, issue.1, pp.9-33, 1997.
DOI : 10.1080/03081079708945167

D. Kahneman, Maps of Bounded Rationality: Psychology for Behavioral Economics, American Economic Review, vol.93, issue.5, p.1, 2003.
DOI : 10.1257/000282803322655392

D. W. Keith, M. Ha-duong, and J. K. Stolaroff, Climate strategy with CO 2 capture from the air, Climatic Change, 2005.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00003926

J. Maynard and K. , A treatise on probability Unabridged republication, 1921.

G. J. Klir, Uncertainty and information measures for imprecise probabilities : an overview, International Symposium on Imprecise Probabilities and Their Applications Ghe, 1999.

J. K. George and . Bernard, An update on generalized information theory, 2003.

D. Charles, R. M. Kolstad, and . Guzman, Information and the divergence between willingness to accept and willingness to pay, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, vol.38, issue.1, pp.66-80, 1999.

I. Kramosil, Belief functions with nonstandard values, Gabbay, pp.380-391, 1997.
DOI : 10.1007/BFb0035636

E. Kriegler and H. Held, Climate projections for the 21st century using random sets, 2003.

T. Samuel-kuhn, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 1962.

R. Leemans and E. Kreilman, The IMAGE-2 model : policy and scientific analysis. Final report NRP no, 1999.

G. Coelho, N. Lins, and F. Souza, A protocol for the elicitation of prior distributions, Second International Symposium on Imprecise Probability and their Applications Cor, 2001.

J. Mark, D. Machina, and . Schmeidler, A more robust definition of subjective probability, Econometrica, vol.60, issue.4, pp.745-780, 1992.

A. S. Manne and R. Richels, Buying greenhouse insurance, Energy Policy, vol.19, issue.6, 1992.
DOI : 10.1016/0301-4215(91)90034-L

C. Mansfield, Despairing Over Disparities: Explaining the Difference Between Willingness to Pay and Willingness to Accept, SSRN Electronic Journal, vol.13, issue.2, pp.219-234, 1999.
DOI : 10.2139/ssrn.43680

N. Misani, Scenari con le mappe cognitive fuzzy : le dinamiche complesse al servizio dell analisi strategica, Economia e Management, vol.3, pp.51-65, 1997.

M. J. Molina and F. Sherwood-rowland, Stratospheric sink for chlorofluoromethanes: chlorine atomc-atalysed destruction of ozone, Nature, vol.230, issue.5460, pp.810-812, 1974.
DOI : 10.1038/249810a0

M. G. Morgan, Quantitative expert subjective judgment : Does it have a role in future IPCC assessments ? In Session Chairs : Dr

H. Stephen and . Schneider, AGCI Session II : Characterizing and Communicating Scientific Uncertainty Aspen Global Change Institute, 1996.

M. G. Morgan, Viewpoint: The Neglected Art of Bounding Analysis, Environmental Science & Technology, vol.35, issue.7, pp.162-164, 2001.
DOI : 10.1021/es012311v

M. , G. Morgan, and M. Henrion, Uncertainty : A guide to dealing with uncertainty in quantitative risk and policy analysis, 1990.

M. , G. Morgan, and D. Keith, Subjective judgments by climate experts, Environmental Science and Technology, vol.29, issue.10, pp.468-476, 1995.

M. Granger-morgan, L. F. Pitelka, and E. Shevliakova, Elicitation of experts judgments of climate change impact on forest ecosystems, Climatic Change, vol.49, issue.3, pp.279-307, 2001.
DOI : 10.1023/A:1010651300697

O. Morgenstern, On the accuracy of economic observations. Princeton University Press, second, completely revised edition, 1963.

T. Morita and H. Lee, IPCC emission scenario database, 2000.

J. L. Christopher, M. Murray, A. D. Ezzati, A. Lopez, S. Rodgers et al., Comparative quantification of health risks : Conceptual framework and methodological issues, Population Health Metrics, vol.1, issue.1111, 2003.

D. C. Washington, Abrupt climate change : inevitables surprises, National Academy of Science NAS, 2002.

R. Nau, De Finetti was right : Probability does not exist, Theory and Decision, vol.51, issue.2/4, pp.89-124, 2002.
DOI : 10.1023/A:1015525808214

R. F. Nau, Arbitrage, incomplete models and interactive rationality, 1999.
DOI : 10.1007/978-1-4757-4592-4_14

R. F. Nau, The aggregation of imprecise probabilities, Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, vol.105, issue.1, pp.265-282, 2001.
DOI : 10.1016/S0378-3758(01)00213-0

D. William and . Nordhaus, Managing the Global Commons, 1994.

M. Parascandola and D. L. Weed, Causation in epidemiology, Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health, vol.55, issue.12, pp.905-912, 2001.
DOI : 10.1136/jech.55.12.905

G. Petschel-held, H. J. Schellnhuber, . Th, K. Bruckner, F. L. Hasselmann et al., The Tolerable Windows approach : Theoretical and methodological foundations, Climatic Change, vol.41, issue.3/4, pp.303-331, 1999.
DOI : 10.1023/A:1005487123751

J. Quiggin, Testing between alternative models of choice under uncertainty?Comment, Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, vol.19, issue.2, pp.161-165, 1993.
DOI : 10.1007/BF01065356

R. Franck-plumpton, Truth and Probability, chapter VII, pp.156-198, 1926.

J. Reilly, P. H. Stone, C. E. Forest, M. D. Webster, H. D. Jacoby et al., CLIMATE CHANGE: Uncertainty and Climate Change Assessments, Science, vol.293, issue.5529, pp.430-433, 2001.
DOI : 10.1126/science.1062001

M. Luis and . Rocha, Relative uncertainty and evidence sets : a constructivist framework, International Journal of General Systems, vol.26, issue.12, pp.35-61, 1997.

J. Kenneth and . Rothman, What is causation ?, chapter 2, 2002.

L. J. Savage, The Foundations of Statistics. Dover, second edition, 1954.

J. Mark, T. Schervish, J. B. Seidenfield, I. Kadane, and . Levi, Extensions of expected utility theory and some limitations of pairwise comparisons, pp.496-510, 2003.

H. Stephen and . Schneider, What is 'dangerous' climate change ? Nature, pp.17-19, 2001.

P. Schwartz and D. Randall, An abrupt climate change scenario and its implications for United States national security, 2003.

G. L. Shackle, Expectation in Economics., The Philosophical Quarterly, vol.3, issue.13, 1952.
DOI : 10.2307/2217133

G. L. Shackle, The Logic of Surprise, Economica, vol.20, issue.78, pp.112-117, 1953.
DOI : 10.2307/2550836

G. Shafer, A Mathematical Theory of Evidence, pp.0-608, 1976.

G. Shafer and V. Vovk, Probability and Finance : It's Only a Game, 2001.
DOI : 10.1002/0471249696

J. F. Shogren and D. J. Hayes, Resolving differences in wilingnes to pay and willingness to accept : Reply, American Economic Review, vol.87, issue.1, pp.241-244, 1997.

A. Herbert and . Simon, Models of bounded rationality, Economic analyses and Public Policy, 1982.

P. Smets, The Nature of the unnormalized Beliefs encountered in the Transferable Belief Model, Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence 92, pp.292-297, 1992.
DOI : 10.1016/B978-1-4832-8287-9.50044-X

P. Smets, The axiomatic justification of the Transferable Belief Model, 1995.

P. Smets, The ??-junctions: Combination operators applicable to belief functions, pp.131-153, 1997.
DOI : 10.1007/BFb0035618

P. Smets, Belief functions and the transferable belief model, 2000.

P. Smets, Data fusion in the transferable belief model, Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Information Fusion, pp.10-13, 2000.
DOI : 10.1109/IFIC.2000.862713

P. Smets, Quantified epistemic possibility theory seen as an hyper cautious Transferable Belief Model, 2000.

P. Smets, Matrix calculus for belief functions, 2001.
DOI : 10.1016/s0888-613x(02)00066-x

URL : http://doi.org/10.1016/s0888-613x(02)00066-x

P. Smets, Decision Making in a Context where Uncertainty is Represented by Belief Functions, 2002.
DOI : 10.1007/978-3-7908-1798-0_2

D. A. Smith, K. Vodden, L. Rucker, and R. Cunningham, Global benefits and costs of the Montreal protocol on substances that deplete the ozone layer Applied Research Consultants Published by Environment Canada. Presented at the 10th Anniversary Colloquium, Montreal. Also available in French as, 1997.

M. Smithson, Ignorance and Uncertainty -Emerging Paradigms, 1988.

C. Starmer, Developments in Non-Expected Utility Theory: The Hunt for a Descriptive Theory of Choice under Risk, Journal of Economic Literature, vol.38, issue.2, pp.332-382, 2000.
DOI : 10.1257/jel.38.2.332

L. Ferenc, T. Toth, H. Bruckner, M. Füssel, G. Leimbach et al., The Tolerable Window approach to integrated assessments, Climate Change and Integrated Assessment Models : Bridging the Gaps?Proceedings of the IPCC Asia Pacific Workshop on Integrated Assessment Models, pp.403-430, 1997.

N. Treich, Décision séquentielle et principe de précaution. Cahiers d'Économie et de Sociologie Rurale, pp.55-566, 2000.

O. Secretariat and U. , Production and consumption of ozone depleting substances, 1986.

F. Voorbraak, Combining evidence under partial ignorance, Gabbay, pp.574-588, 1997.
DOI : 10.1007/BFb0035650

P. Walley, Statistical Reasoning with Imprecise Probabilities, 1991.
DOI : 10.1007/978-1-4899-3472-7

P. Walley, Inferences from multinomial data : Learning about a bag of marbles, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Methodological), vol.58, issue.1, pp.3-57, 1996.

P. Walley, Coherent upper and lower previsions, 1998.

P. Walley, Towards a unified theory of imprecise probability, International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, vol.24, issue.2-3, pp.125-148, 2000.
DOI : 10.1016/S0888-613X(00)00031-1

T. S. Wallsten, D. V. Budescu, A. Rapoport, R. Swick, and B. Forsyth, Measuring the vague meanings of probability terms., Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, vol.115, issue.4, pp.348-365, 1986.
DOI : 10.1037/0096-3445.115.4.348

T. M. Wigley and S. C. Raper, Interpretation of High Projections for Global-Mean Warming, Science, vol.293, issue.5529, pp.451-454, 2001.
DOI : 10.1126/science.1061604

T. M. Wigley, R. Richels, and J. A. Edmonds, Economic and environmental choices in the stabilization of atmospheric CO 2 concentrations, Nature, issue.6562, pp.379-240, 1996.

R. A. Young, Uncertainty and the environment : implications for decision making and environmental policy. New horizons in environmental economics, 2001.
DOI : 10.4337/9781781951385

L. A. Zadeh, Fuzzy sets as a basis for a theory of possibility, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol.1, issue.1, pp.3-389, 1978.
DOI : 10.1016/0165-0114(78)90029-5