J. H. Abbring and G. J. Van-den-berg, The Nonparametric Identification of Treatment Effects in Duration Models, Econometrica, vol.71, issue.5, pp.1491-1517, 2003.
DOI : 10.1111/1468-0262.00456

A. L. Booth, J. J. Dolado, and J. Frank, SYMPOSIUM ON TEMPORARY WORK: INTRODUCTION, The Economic Journal, vol.112, issue.480, pp.181-188, 2002.
DOI : 10.1787/empl_outlook-2001-en

B. Cockx and M. Picchio, Are short-lived jobs stepping stones to longlasting jobs?, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 2012.

C. N. Brinch, Nonparametric identication of the mixed hazards model with time-varying covariates, Econometric Theory, vol.23, pp.349-354, 2007.
DOI : 10.1017/s0266466607070144

D. Graaf-zijl, M. Van-den-berg, G. J. Heyma, and A. , Stepping stones for the unemployed: the effect of temporary jobs on the duration until (regular) work, Journal of Population Economics, vol.20, issue.1, pp.107-139, 2011.
DOI : 10.1002/jae.770

S. Dimova, S. Nyland, and M. Rosholm, Unemployment duration, case workers, vacancies, and cyclical variations, 2012.

S. Ek and B. Holmlund, Part-Time unemployment and optimal unemployment insurance. IZA Discussion Papers 5540, 2011.
DOI : 10.1007/s10797-013-9301-0
URL : http://www.iza.org/conference_files/SUMS2010/ek_s5643.pdf

S. Gaure, K. Røed, and T. Zhang, Time and causality: A Monte Carlo assessment of the timing-of-events approach, Journal of Econometrics, vol.141, issue.2, p.11591195, 2007.
DOI : 10.1016/j.jeconom.2007.01.015

A. Holen and S. Horowitz, Partial Unemployment Insurance Benefits and the Extent of Partial Unemployment, The Journal of Human Resources, vol.9, issue.3, pp.420-422, 1974.
DOI : 10.2307/144698

S. N. Houseman, A. L. Kalleberg, and G. A. Erickcek, The Role of Temporary Agency Employment in Tight Labor Markets, ILR Review, vol.121, issue.11, pp.105-127, 2003.
DOI : 10.1177/001979390105500107
URL : http://research.upjohn.org/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1090&context=up_workingpapers

C. J. Heinrich, P. R. Mueser, and K. R. Troske, Welfare to Temporary Work: Implications for Labor Market Outcomes, Review of Economics and Statistics, vol.11, issue.18, pp.154-173, 2005.
DOI : 10.1257/jep.11.2.117
URL : https://mospace.umsystem.edu/xmlui/bitstream/10355/2718/1/WelfareTemporaryWork.pdf

E. J. Jahn and M. Rosholm, Looking beyond the bridge: How temporary agency employment aects labor market outcomes. IZA Discussion Paper 4973, 2010.
DOI : 10.1016/j.euroecorev.2013.11.001
URL : http://www.aeaweb.org/aea/2011conference/program/retrieve.php?pdfid=195

T. Kyyrä, Partial unemployment insurance benefits and the transition rate to regular work, European Economic Review, vol.54, issue.7, pp.911-930, 2010.
DOI : 10.1016/j.euroecorev.2010.02.005

L. Hartman, L. Lindqvist, and O. N. Skans-nordström, Stepping-stones, dead-ends, or both? An analysis of Swedish replacement contracts, Empirical Economics, vol.17, issue.4, pp.645-668, 2010.
DOI : 10.1007/s00181-009-0283-9

B. Mccall, Unemployment Insurance Rules, Joblessness, and Part-Time Work, Econometrica, vol.64, issue.3, pp.647-682, 1996.
DOI : 10.2307/2171865

B. Mccall, The Determinants of Full???Time versus Part???Time Reemployment following Job Displacement, Journal of Labor Economics, vol.15, issue.4, pp.714-734, 1997.
DOI : 10.1086/209843

I. H. Møller and J. Lind, The labour market in process of change?: Some critical comments, International Journal of Employment Studies, vol.8, issue.1, pp.155-195, 2000.

R. Munts, Partial Benefit Schedules in Unemployment Insurance: Their Effect on Work Incentive, The Journal of Human Resources, vol.5, issue.2, pp.160-176, 1970.
DOI : 10.2307/144896

E. Rasmussen, J. Lind, and J. Visser, Divergence in Part-Time Work in New Zealand, the Netherlands and Denmark, British Journal of Industrial Relations, vol.25, issue.2, pp.637-658, 2004.
DOI : 10.1017/S095001709900015X

M. Rosholm, Experimental evidence on the nature of the Danish employment miracle. IZA Discussion Paper 3620, 2008.

K. Røed and L. Westlie, UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE IN WELFARE STATES: THE IMPACTS OF SOFT DURATION CONSTRAINTS, Journal of the European Economic Association, vol.60, issue.4, pp.518-554, 2012.
DOI : 10.1111/1468-0084.00085

J. Staghøj, M. Svarer, and M. Rosholm, Choosing the Best Training Programme: Is there a Case for Statistical Treatment Rules?, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, vol.10, issue.2, pp.172-201, 2010.
DOI : 10.17848/9781417524440.ch10

M. Svarer, The Effect of Sanctions on Exit from Unemployment: Evidence from Denmark, Economica, vol.22, issue.(2), pp.751-778, 2011.
DOI : 10.1086/380408

, Robustness analysis In-treatment Post-treatment Specication: Coe, Table, vol.6

A. Baseline,

B. , SUIB subspells shorter than 3 weeks ignored -0

C. , SUIB subspells shorter than 5 weeks ignored -0

D. , Workers immediately on SUIB included -0

E. , Unobserved heterogeneity at spell level -0

F. , Covariates for time spent on UI benets excluded -0

, Notes: All results are based on the model specication with homogeneous treatment eects. Numbers in bold are statistically signicant at the 5% level Table 7: Treatment eects by group Homogeneous eects from sub-samples Average eects from the model with In-treatment Post-treatment heterogeneous treatment eects

. Coe and . Std, Err. Coe. Std.Err. In-treatment Post-treatment By family status: Single men

, Single women -0

U. By,

, Manufacturing industry -0

, White collar workers -1

, Notes: The average eects in the last two columns are based on the parameters in Table 3. The average in-treatment eect is evaluated at the average values of covariates at the beginning of supplementary UI benet period for the group in the question. The average post-treatment eect is evaluated at the average values of covariates at the beginning of full-time unemployment after receipt of supplementary UI benet, Coecients in bold are statistically signicant at the 5% level