Behind the scenes of scientific articles: defining categories of fraud and regulating cases

Abstract : From a perspective informed by science and technology studies, this article establishes a general diagnosis on the regulation of publication practices and suggest methods of analysis, by reviewing both recent cases of scientific misconduct and others, less recent, that they call to mind. First of all, this paper reviews how the practices deemed to be deviant have been qualifed in the past by distinguishing the categories stemming from data integrity and the conditions of data production from those concerning the relationships between the authors of publications and their content. Then, it analyzes three specific problems and the institutional responses aiming to prevent them, channel them, and attempt to solve them.
Type de document :
Autre publication
CSI WORKING PAPERS 031. CSI WORKING PAPERS 031. 2013
Liste complète des métadonnées


https://hal-mines-paristech.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00780561
Contributeur : Catherine Lucas <>
Soumis le : jeudi 24 janvier 2013 - 12:08:58
Dernière modification le : dimanche 18 juin 2017 - 21:43:31
Document(s) archivé(s) le : samedi 1 avril 2017 - 10:04:36

Fichier

WP_CSI_031.pdf
Fichiers produits par l'(les) auteur(s)

Identifiants

  • HAL Id : hal-00780561, version 1

Collections

Citation

David Pontille, Didier Torny. Behind the scenes of scientific articles: defining categories of fraud and regulating cases. CSI WORKING PAPERS 031. CSI WORKING PAPERS 031. 2013. <hal-00780561>

Partager

Métriques

Consultations de
la notice

2320

Téléchargements du document

365