4115 articles – 7314 Notices  [english version]
HAL : halshs-00353880, version 1

Fiche détaillée  Récupérer au format
CONSISTENT DYNAMICE CHOICE AND NON-EXPECTED UTILITY PREFERENCES
André Lapied ( ) 1, 2, Pascal Tocquebeuf 1
(01/10/2007)

Pursuing works from Sarin and Wakker (1998), we study how NonExpected Utility models could be consistently applied to multi-stage decision problems. Concerning multiple priors model, we remove the argument that dynamic consistency, consequentialism and model consistency (sequential consistency in Sarin and Wakker (1998)) can all be preserved. Like Choquet expected utility, deviation of expected utility is only allowed over the final stage. Moreover, it's proved for the two models that if we also assume reduction of compound acts, then an expected utility representation exists in all stages.
1 :  Groupement de Recherche en Économie Quantitative d'Aix-Marseille (GREQAM)
Université de la Méditerranée - Aix-Marseille II – Université Paul Cézanne - Aix-Marseille III – École des Hautes Études en Sciences Sociales [EHESS] – CNRS : UMR6579
2 :  Institut d'Économie Publique (IDEP)
GREQAM
Sciences de l'Homme et Société/Economie et finances
Choquet Expected Utility – Multiple Priors – Sequential Choice – Dynamic Consistency – Consequentialism – Reduction of Compound Acts.
Liste des fichiers attachés à ce document : 
PDF
2007-20.pdf(272.3 KB)