When students give biased responses to researchers: An exploration of traditional paper vs. computerized self-administration - HAL-SHS - Sciences de l'Homme et de la Société Accéder directement au contenu
Communication Dans Un Congrès Année : 2010

When students give biased responses to researchers: An exploration of traditional paper vs. computerized self-administration

Résumé

This article investigates the impact of two data collection modes (online surveys and paper-and-pencil surveys) and the perceived attractiveness of the experimenter on two types of response biases: social desirability and demand artifacts. Its results highlight the combined effect of the data collection mode and the perceived attractiveness of the experimenter on social desirability and show that signs sensitivity and signs interpretation (two types of demand artifacts) are stronger in the context of online surveys than in the context of paper-and-pencil surveys.
Fichier principal
Vignette du fichier
Student_Response_Biases_EMAC.pdf (188.25 Ko) Télécharger le fichier
Origine : Fichiers produits par l'(les) auteur(s)
Loading...

Dates et versions

halshs-00636231 , version 1 (11-01-2012)

Identifiants

  • HAL Id : halshs-00636231 , version 1

Citer

Raphaëlle Butori, Béatrice Parguel. When students give biased responses to researchers: An exploration of traditional paper vs. computerized self-administration. EMAC, 2010, Copenhague, Denmark. ⟨halshs-00636231⟩
218 Consultations
944 Téléchargements

Partager

Gmail Facebook X LinkedIn More